Readit News logoReadit News
roc commented on The iPhone X   daringfireball.net/2017/1... · Posted by u/nnx
willtim · 8 years ago
Perhaps one might admit that Apple are late to the game with OLED and edge-to-edge displays?
roc · 8 years ago
Admit? Like it's a secret he's trying to cover up?

Apple people simply don't care. They know Apple's "late." (Inasmuch as someone else has done a similar thing, or used a similar piece of tech "first".) Because Apple is almost always late.

Late to touch. Late to smartphones. Late to fingerprint readers. Late to face identification. Late to attention detection. Late to wireless charging. Late to big screens. Late to music streaming. Late to video services. Late to the TV. Late to the wrist. Late to the wireless headphones. etc.

roc commented on IPhones start slowing down after a year   theverge.com/circuitbreak... · Posted by u/alex_young
leerob · 8 years ago
> Who in the world would run right out and buy a new iPhone if their last one became unusable in one year?

A lot of people? I'm sure there are tons of people who do this where cost isn't an issue.

roc · 8 years ago
Let's assume some measurable number of people might do this, purely for arguments sake. Why does the resale value of old iPhones not reflect these devices being "unusable?"
roc commented on Apple Says Apps Must Now Disclose Odds for Loot Boxes   kotaku.com/apple-says-itu... · Posted by u/kelukelugames
roc · 8 years ago
Good.

Now add a distinction between IAPs for consumables vs features vs content.

roc commented on Apple Says It Slows Older iPhones to Save Their Battery Life   text.npr.org/s.php?sId=57... · Posted by u/lyk
trynumber9 · 8 years ago
Should be a switch in the settings. Prefer battery life or prefer performance. One more setting won't kill anyone.
roc · 8 years ago
The whole problem is that the batteries can't deliver that performance.

They can throttle the chip to what the battery can deliver or it will crash. Maybe Apple's more conservative on the throttling, and some amount of performance could still be achieved without a crash, but there's zero chance Apple's putting a "make my phone unstable" switch in Settings.

roc commented on Mastodon makes the Internet feel like home again   theoutline.com/post/2689/... · Posted by u/smacktoward
nathcd · 8 years ago
> unadulterated reverse-chronological order

This is a wonderful phrase. It's hilarious and strange what we've come to value in a feed. What else might we now be taking for granted that ad companies are going to fuck up?

roc · 8 years ago
I'd say "your notification tray", but it seems like the majority has already lost that one.
roc commented on IPhones start slowing down after a year   theverge.com/circuitbreak... · Posted by u/alex_young
okreallywtf · 8 years ago
My question would be - how are you supposed to know when to replace the battery? You can judge your battery capacity fairly decently yourself - if the phone used to be at 40% after a day of hard use and now it barely makes it to bedtime you know its degraded. Measuring relative performance of the phone would be very difficult to gauge yourself. Granted, in both situations you could have other issues (unknown apps running etc), but if you aren't changing anything about your phone for the most part you'll know when the battery is not doing as good as it has. You then know to replace it.

Even if this isn't planned obsolescence, it is tangential to it. They know they are putting a new phone out every year or so, and they are hedging their bets that people will move to it so this decision makes total sense for them financially. It feels underhanded even if not fraudulent, they made a decision that is better for them than you. God forbid you have to charge your phone during the day?

roc · 8 years ago
Apple needs to do way better at informing the user when the battery is notably degraded, and when that degradation is leading to notable throttling.

Particularly, when as the throttling is severe (more than 25% or so) and when the user is encountering it with any frequency.

roc commented on IPhones start slowing down after a year   theverge.com/circuitbreak... · Posted by u/alex_young
blinkingled · 8 years ago
Another way to look at this is Apple isn't putting in the right sized batteries in their phones because they believe thinner phone is a better phone. If all it takes is one year for the phone battery to stop providing enough juice to the CPU/GPU then either the battery is not of adequately designed capacity or the CPU/GPU has too much peak power draw for the battery.

Either way looks like a design issue that's just too convenient for Apple to keep selling new phones each year. If they put slightly thicker battery with adequate spare capacity or reduced peak power draw for their SoC people can get 2+ years of consistent performance out of their device. Instead Apple is designing to provide one year of peak performance followed by slow downs so you can go out and get the new phone next year - sounds not very user friendly to me no matter if it looks intentional or not.

roc · 8 years ago
Who in the world would run right out and buy a new iPhone if their last one became unusable in one year?

People switch to the iPhone because of their longer usable life compared to the competition. People pay more for old iPhones compared to the competition because of their longer usable life. Not only is it not in Apple's interest to make self-destructing phones, to even accuse them of that requires ignoring the entire history of iPhone adoption and resale value.

Further, there is no "one year" for batteries. Batteries with more charge cycles degrade faster. Batteries that push peak performance more often degrade faster. Batteries that spend time in extreme heat and cold degrade faster. Because of this, a simple anecdote of "throttling after a year" means even less than usual.

No-one has data on how much throttling is going on, but Apple. The best proxy we have is the aggregate purchasing decisions of people who had iPhones, and the prices of used iPhones. And people with iPhones overwhelmingly keep buying iPhones. And the prices of used iPhones aren't going anywhere. This "Apple makes self-destructing phones" theory needs a rest.

roc commented on IPhones start slowing down after a year   theverge.com/circuitbreak... · Posted by u/alex_young
slantyyz · 8 years ago
>> If given the option on my old iPhone 6 plus, I would have chose to maybe have the phone shut off suddenly at 40% battery life and run at full speed.

This sort of begs the question - if your phone is shutting off suddenly at 40%, is the battery really at 40%?

People have certain preconceived expectations when they see a percentage. The best analog I can think of is a gas tank. People know that how they drive affects their fuel consumption, but they also know that when their gas tank is 40% full, their car's not going to shut off suddenly.

Perhaps we need to look at using a different measure than percent to indicate remaining battery life. Having said that, I don't know what that different measure would be.

roc · 8 years ago
I don't think you can have such a number, as it hinges so heavily on unknowable future usage and environmental factors.

And frankly now that sudden shutdown isn't a thing, I don't think it matters much. Apple just has to communicate the situation better when processor throttling reaches severe states.

roc commented on Overexposure to insecticides has bred resistance in lice   scientificamerican.com/ar... · Posted by u/artsandsci
socalnate1 · 8 years ago
This is sort of an aside, but when I first became a parent 6 years ago and I started reading "DD," "DS," "LO" etc all over the internet in parenting forums, it was my first indication that all parents (myself included) have lost their minds.

What an odd shorthand convention.

roc · 8 years ago
I don't think geeks get to throw stones on shorthand.

For Mb vs MB vs MiB alone we've lost any and all credibility.

roc commented on Comcast says it will not sell customer browsing histories   reuters.com/article/us-us... · Posted by u/jgrahamc
drenvuk · 8 years ago
Assuming every site is using https I'm not sure how they would be able to make money off of this with web based advertising since you can't inject ads. Does anyone know how else they could make money?
roc · 8 years ago
Good old fashioned junk mail, background check services, and consumer research?

Even if they keep their literal word and don't sell your actual history, and you use SSL so they can't see specific content, they can certainly make money by identifying traffic profiles by domains/times/frequencies/etc.

u/roc

KarmaCake day10235March 31, 2009View Original