Readit News logoReadit News
rmrfrmrf commented on Don't write bugs   teamten.com/lawrence/prog... · Posted by u/luu
myvoiceismypass · 4 years ago
Or use Option/Maybe or Either to represent this and let callers explicitly handle this rather than catching an exception. Is an entity not being found truly an exceptional case?
rmrfrmrf · 4 years ago
In the case that you're providing an explicit id as an argument, yes. If it were a query, no. It's dangerous to use an empty value for all failed lookups, as you can't differentiate between "not found because it doesn't exist" versus "not found because the database went offline for a minute".
rmrfrmrf commented on Facebook whistleblower says she wants to fix company, not harm it   wsj.com/articles/facebook... · Posted by u/mudil
worldsayshi · 4 years ago
I'm curious if when most people say they "quit" Facebook they removed their account or if they just stopped using it. It feels like most people I know has stopped using it, except for messenger, but almost no-one has actually removed or closed down their account.
rmrfrmrf · 4 years ago
deactivating and/or closing your account just gives them more datapoints imo, and the number of people who do it is so small that it makes a great metric for fingerprinting.

Deleted Comment

rmrfrmrf commented on GitHub, fuck your name change   mooseyanon.medium.com/git... · Posted by u/leontrolski
majormajor · 5 years ago
So let it happen quickly without complaining about it so that tomorrow we can be arguing about something else, instead of arguing about the same thing for ten straight years.

"People get pissed off even by small changes" is a MUCH bigger impediment towards real progress than "people are making small changes that won't fix the whole world" is.

I don't believe most of the people who say they're only problem is that the change is "too small." I think that's just an excuse of convenience to resist any change or challenge to the status quo. If your problem is that the change isn't big enough, the solution is to push for bigger ones yourself! But that's not usually what we see those people doing...

rmrfrmrf · 5 years ago
It's not the size of the change that's a problem, it's that the change doesn't address the problem at all, and that the only metric for success for these changes is how angry they make people (which, in the circles of the people proposing these changes, means the change is "working").

It's entirely possible to hire more engineers of color and pay them fairly, but it turns out that pitting workers against each other by introducing a handful of inconsequential process and standards changes is much cheaper and hinders the solidarity that enables coordinated advocacy for better working conditions.

rmrfrmrf commented on Justice at Spotify   unionofmusicians.org/just... · Posted by u/giuliomagnifico
bmmayer1 · 5 years ago
Does anyone know if this so-called union is an actual union? As in, do they collect dues, do they represent a substantial % of artists, and do its members already collectively bargain with Spotify and similar publishers? If Spotify says no, do these demands have any teeth?
rmrfrmrf · 5 years ago
It looks like yet another cosplay of 20th century labor politics, but with the typical 21st century twist of diverting the fight from those who wield power to... the paying customers, for whatever reason.
rmrfrmrf commented on HN front page ranked using only votes from early users (2009)   news.ycombinator.com/clas... · Posted by u/ibraheemdev
whatever1 · 5 years ago
How is this helpful? If the HN veterans did not like the 2020 content of HN they would simply not use it.

The results are just showing the particular interests of that group of people who still enjoy the site after 12 years.

rmrfrmrf · 5 years ago
To give an example, I'd rather not have votes count from people who are upset about this one particular method of ranking. I might start using this view more!
rmrfrmrf commented on Metakovan, the mystery Beeple art buyer, and his NFT/DeFi scheme   amycastor.com/2021/03/14/... · Posted by u/davidgerard
habitue · 5 years ago
Art + money laundering = regular fine art world[1]

So really this is just adding crypto to the mix, because "everything's a little bit better when you sprinkle crypto on it"

[1] https://www.cnn.com/2020/07/29/business/art-money-laundering...

rmrfrmrf · 5 years ago
So it's "everything's better with bacon" for the 2020s? Gross!

Deleted Comment

rmrfrmrf commented on Goroutines are not significantly lighter than threads   matklad.github.io//2021/0... · Posted by u/todsacerdoti
mykowebhn · 5 years ago
This is a very common newbie mistake. Fix by passing in i.

    for i := 0; i < 10; i++ {
       go func(i int) {
          f(i) // sees whatever value i has when f() is called, usually 10
       }(i)
    }

rmrfrmrf · 5 years ago
absolutely wild to me that Real Engineers (TM) complained about this in JavaScript for years only for it to be called a "newbie mistake" in Go.
rmrfrmrf commented on Pipe – Instant access to your annual cash flow   pipe.com/... · Posted by u/telotortium
rmrfrmrf · 5 years ago
We wanted flying cars, instead we got 140,000 fintech companies

u/rmrfrmrf

KarmaCake day3162September 28, 2012View Original