For shame, these are great tools...
For shame, these are great tools...
The most minute of barriers requiring you to deliberately and consciously join and leave...
Not exactly the same as your idea, but definitely in the same vein of "only available under a certain condition"
> It’s a sentiment eagerly embraced by The Dull Men’s Club. Several million members in a number of connected Facebook groups strive to cause dullness in others on a daily basis.
Apparently I'm too dull to even have a FB account. I know it's a bit tongue in cheek, but in the name of maximum dullness, something with UX closer to this site seems much more appropriate than a Facebook group.
If I want to create a React app with X amount of pages, some Redux stores, Auth, etc. then it can smash that out in minutes. I can say "now add X" and it'll do it. Generally with good results.
But when it comes to maintaining existing systems, or adding more complicated features, or needing to know business domain details, a LLM is usually not that great for me. They're still great as a code suggestion tool, finishing lines and functions. But as far as delivering whole features, they're pretty useless once you get past the easy stuff. And you'll spend as much time directing the LLM to do this kind of this as you would just writing it yourself.
What I tend to do is write stubbed out code in the design I like, then I'll get an LLM to just fill in the gaps.
These people who say LLMs make them 100x more productive probably are only working on greenfield stuff and haven't got to the hard bit yet.
Like everyone says, the first 90% is the easy bit. The last 10% is where you'll spend most of your time, and I don't see LLMs doing the hard bit that well currently.
This seems like an interesting approach, though to me it begs the question: what does "stubbed out code" look like? How much stubbing is done? Have you considered using pseudocode as comments within a larger "stubbed out" portion?
The importance of rules and context has begun to elevate its significance (...that is, if context wasn't always very important), and finding ways to articulate that context seems to be a skill of greater importance...
I'd also add this: tools like the AI bots so prevalent today are flawed because they cannot consider things like context, limitations, dependencies and scope. I give a question...they attempt to spit out a complete answer with complete disregard for the context which my question is coming from.
AI fails in the same way a monkey can't drive a car.... abstraction. We humans know a red light ahead means stop at the stop light, not stop immediately where you are right now. All AI can do is make a best guess of what the inputs pattern-match to. This is like always having an answer without ever asking for clarification or context.
That said, I do think he absolutely deserved to be released, not because he didn't deserve to be locked up in the first place, but because he's clearly been rehabilitated and has done great work during his time in prison. All that considered, ten years seems like a not unreasonable prison sentence for what he did. I hope he'll continue to do good when he's released.
Why this person specifically? And why at this time? Perhaps the discussion shouldn't be about the actual subject of the pardon, and perhaps more about the motives of the pardoner...
Typically you both say a greeting then a conversation starts.
> Instead of being polite, you are just making the other person wait for you to phrase your question, which is lost productivity.
Please don't count every second of your life in productivity lost to someone else.
The root of the problem might be frustration with not getting something done, and that needs your reflection.
Or just wake up 3 seconds earlier, and if worried about lost sleep, get to sleep 3 seconds earlier or in the words of Arnold Schwarzenegger "sleep faster."
Are you ok with not having the conversation?
What would be the message you eventually receive about my behavior?
And if you bring up my non-response in the future, and I do not verbally respond, what would your impression be of my communication style?
And wouldn't it be better to oh, I don't know, enforce the standard corporate tax rate?