Readit News logoReadit News
reasonableklout commented on Clawed   hyperdimensional.co/p/cla... · Posted by u/jger15
mitchbob · 11 days ago
So, a guy goes to work for the second Trump administration after seeing the shitshow of the first and then bemoans the death of democracy. Rich.
reasonableklout · 11 days ago
The author is pretty sanguine about it:

> The death I am describing has been going on for most of my life. The incident I am going to write about now took place last week, and it may even be halfway satisfyingly resolved within a day.

> I am not saying this incident “caused” any sort of republican death, nor am I saying it “ushered in a new era.” If this event contributed anything, it simply made the ongoing death more obvious and less deniable for me personally. I consider the events of the last week a kind of death rattle of the old republic, the outward expression of a body that has thrown in the towel.

reasonableklout commented on Statement from Dario Amodei on our discussions with the Department of War   anthropic.com/news/statem... · Posted by u/qwertox
gizmodo59 · 15 days ago
They are playing a good PR game for sure. Their recent track record doesn’t show if they can be trusted. Few millions is nothing for their current revenue and saying they sacrificed is a big stretch here.
reasonableklout · 15 days ago
It's much more than a few million? Being declared a supply chain risk means that no company that wants to do business with the government can buy Anthropic. And no company that wants to do business with those businesses can buy Anthropic either. This rules out pretty much all American corporations as customers?
reasonableklout commented on Statement from Dario Amodei on our discussions with the Department of War   anthropic.com/news/statem... · Posted by u/qwertox
ekianjo · 15 days ago
You know this is pure PR right?
reasonableklout · 15 days ago
If Anthropic is nationalized or declared a supply chain risk tomorrow, will you say the same?
reasonableklout commented on Statement from Dario Amodei on our discussions with the Department of War   anthropic.com/news/statem... · Posted by u/qwertox
RyanShook · 15 days ago
The whole article reads as virtue signaling to me. Anthropic already has large defense contracts. Their models are already being used by the military. There's really no statement here.
reasonableklout · 15 days ago
How is it virtue signalling when sticking by these principles risks their entire business being destroyed by either being declared a supply chain risk or nationalized?
reasonableklout commented on Statement from Dario Amodei on our discussions with the Department of War   anthropic.com/news/statem... · Posted by u/qwertox
bnr-ais · 15 days ago
Anthropic had the largest IP settlement ($1.5 billion) for stolen material and Amodei repeatedly predicted mass unemployment within 6 months due to AI. Without being bothered about it at all.

It is a horrible and ruthless company and hearing a presumably rich ex-employee painting a rosy picture does not change anything.

reasonableklout · 15 days ago
Pretty sure Amodei makes noise about mass unemployment because he is very bothered by the technology that the entire industry (of which Anthropic just one player) is racing to build as fast as possible?

Why do you think he is not bothered at all, when they publish post after post in their newsroom about the economic effects of AI?

reasonableklout commented on Anthropic drops flagship safety pledge   time.com/7380854/exclusiv... · Posted by u/cwwc
cmrdporcupine · 15 days ago
What's "entertaining" is more the speed at which it's happening.

It took Google probably 15 years to fully evil-ize. Anthropic ... two?

There is no "ethical capitalism" big tech company possible, esp once VC is involved, and especially with the current geopolitical circumstances.

reasonableklout · 15 days ago
How did they evil-ize? The new Responsible Scaling Policy is still the most transparent out of all the labs. And there are the separate principles they’ve stipulated for the Pentagon, under which they’re facing threat of nationalization or being declared a supply chain risk
reasonableklout commented on Anthropic drops flagship safety pledge   time.com/7380854/exclusiv... · Posted by u/cwwc
tabbott · 15 days ago
I feel like the articles on this have been very negative ... but aren't the Anthropic promises on safety following this change still considerably stronger than those made by the competing AI labs?
reasonableklout · 15 days ago
Yes, and it is easy to look at the reality of the market and see how this is needed to remain competitive
reasonableklout commented on Tech companies shouldn't be bullied into doing surveillance   eff.org/deeplinks/2026/02... · Posted by u/pseudolus
myvoiceismypass · 16 days ago
Hate to break the news but they might not be good guys either - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47145963

(Dropping safety pledge)

reasonableklout · 16 days ago
Do you think it's possible the two are related?
reasonableklout commented on "Token anxiety", a slot machine by any other name   jkap.io/token-anxiety-or-... · Posted by u/presbyterian
hnbad · 25 days ago
> The current trend in all major providers seem to be: get you to spin up as many agents as possible so that you can get billed more and their number of requests goes up.

I was surprised when I saw that Cursor added a feature to set the number of agents for a given prompt. I figured it might be a performance thing - fan out complex tasks across multiple agents that can work on the problem in parallel and get a combined solution. I was extremely disappointed when I realized it's just "repeat the same prompt to N separate agents, let each one take a shot and then pick a winner". Especially when some tasks can run for several minutes, rapidly burning through millions of tokens per agent.

At that point it's just rolling dice. If an agent goes so far off-script that its result is trash, I would expect that to mean I need to rework the instructions and context I gave it, not that I should try the same thing again and hope that entropy fixes it. But editing your prompt offline doesn't burn tokens, so it's not what makes them money.

reasonableklout · 25 days ago
Cursor and others have a subagent feature, which sounds like what you wanted. However, there has to be some decision making around how to divide up a prompt into tasks. This is decided by the (parent) model currently.

The best-of-N feature is a bit like rolling N dice instead of one. But it can be quite useful if you use different models with different strengths and weaknesses (e.g. Claude/GPT-5/Gemini), rather than assigning all to N instances of Claude, for example. I like to use this feature in ask mode when diving into a codebase, to get an explanation a few different ways.

u/reasonableklout

KarmaCake day311December 13, 2022
About
https://andrewkchan.dev/
View Original