The play is well know: create a marketplace with customers and vendors like Amazon, Facebook, Google.
But with GPT-4 training finished last summer they had plenty of time for strategy.
I can crank out tools in minutes. No complicated build systems or web pack or dependency management system. No react, no reduce, no apollo or graphql. No typescript, etc.
Just simple go, html, css, and a bit of javascript when it's needed for a form. I don't minimize anything, or try to do anything fancy. It faster to develop in, and faster to load in the browser.
I'm specifically talking about internal tools here.
Until you get told to implement more reactive features, then it's over. Using Pure JS/JQuery for reactiveness is outright horrible.
I seem to remember early 2010s... I had written a few small FB apps, and ... the minimal permissions it would ask for from people were... large. IIRC, the minimal permissions always included access to friend lists, even when I had 0 intention of using that. I didn't want it, but there was no way to opt out. I suspect it's somewhat more granular now, and less intrusive out of the box, but... yeah, when your defaults/minimums are expansive, you'll get stuff like that. I think the CA stuff still happened while those defaults were in place (although they may have also asked for more permissions too).
The claims I've seen circulating are all insane, such as that Russia did it to avoid being found guilty of contract violations or that they did it to attack the Norway-Baltic pipeline. Note that the Nord Stream pipelines' total capacity is 150+ BCM, whereas the Norway-Baltic pipeline is only 10BCM NG - less than 1/10th.
Russia has gained zero, whereas EU countries have removed an internal pressure point, and the USA has gained a larger energy share. I don't know who sabotaged the pipelines, but the superficial blaming of Russia without any evidence should be criticized.
Lastly, I detest all attacks and invasions of sovereign entities.
No. Debt owed to China is less than 10% of Sri Lanka's total debt. And it owes a lot more to western nations/institutes.
I'm still shocked how this clearly unsubstantiated claim continues to circulate. The so called "China debt trap diplomacy" is a phenomenon mostly fabricated/promoted by columnists with a clear agenda.
Instead, I think his ideas for blue check verification won’t happen because blue checks are unofficially a carrot that Twitter can hang for brands that spend on their ad platform.
> Notable people were using Twitter long before blue checks were a thing
True. Now that I think about it, I most definitely oversold it. Blue-check is a nice to have benefit but notable accounts are still today religiously using Twitter despite not being verified. I think I was focusing too much on the journalist clique on Twitter and their excessive desire for a blue-check.