We've done some vibe checks on it with OpenHands and it indeed performs roughly as good as Sonnet 4.5.
OSS models are catching up
We've done some vibe checks on it with OpenHands and it indeed performs roughly as good as Sonnet 4.5.
OSS models are catching up
OpenHands, Toad, and OpenCode are fully OSS and LLM-agnostic
Has it gotten better and good enough? I tried it a few months back and it was pretty crappy. And it's not because of bad models (I used it with the latest Claude at that time) but because of poor harness implementation and UI.
Is it worth trying the latest version to see how it compares with Claude Code? I want OSS, model agnostic implementation to win but I felt the odds are off then. I'd be happy to be proven wrong.
MIT license and model agnostic
I’d also keep a close eye on Toad which is launching this month:
I'm curious to know which one would suit me best.
When I build an agent my standard is Cursor, which updates the UI at every reportable step of the way, and gives you a ton of control opportunities, which I find creates a lot of confidence.
Is this level of detail and control possible with the OpenHands SDK? I’m asking because the last SDK that was simple to get into lacked that kind of control.
We're about to launch an SDK that gives devs all these building blocks, specifically oriented around software agents. Would love feedback if anyone wants to look: https://github.com/OpenHands/software-agent-sdk
https://github.com/rbren/personal-ai-devbox