Readit News logoReadit News
rasmus1610 commented on Open models by OpenAI   openai.com/open-models/... · Posted by u/lackoftactics
atlasunshrugged · 23 days ago
Add government here too (along with all the firms that service government customers)
rasmus1610 · 23 days ago
Add healthcare. Cannot send our patients data to a cloud provider
rasmus1610 commented on Astro is a return to the fundamentals of the web   websmith.studio/blog/astr... · Posted by u/pumbaa
steve_taylor · 2 months ago
Be careful with Netlify. Their bandwidth charges are even more egregious than Vercel’s.
rasmus1610 · 2 months ago
Yes, good point. Although the traffic for these websites is so small, that I think I‘m good there for a long time.
rasmus1610 commented on Astro is a return to the fundamentals of the web   websmith.studio/blog/astr... · Posted by u/pumbaa
ewuhic · 2 months ago
Were you commissioned by a friend? How does one find a gig building a medical practice website?
rasmus1610 · 2 months ago
I’m a doctor myself and thus have contacts to people having medical practices :)

But at least in Germany there are some agencies doing nothing else.

rasmus1610 commented on Astro is a return to the fundamentals of the web   websmith.studio/blog/astr... · Posted by u/pumbaa
rasmus1610 · 2 months ago
I recently build a website for a medical practice using Astro.

I was amazed by how easy it was compared to my experience with Wordpress for this several years ago.

And I can host it for free on something like Netlify and I don’t need to worry about the site being hacked, like with WP.

I even built a very simple git-based CMS so that the client can update the content themselves.

Web dev has really come a long way, despite what a lot of people say.

rasmus1610 commented on MonsterUI: Python library for building front end UIs quickly in FastHTML apps   answer.ai/posts/2025-01-1... · Posted by u/indigodaddy
ddanieltan · 3 months ago
I'm starting to come around to this opinion. I was originally quite bullish on FastHTML but I am starting to feel a little bit lost with all the abstraction and indirection.

I was initially attracted by the idea that I could replace the traditional HTML, CSS, Javascript , Python (backend) project entirely in Python, but it's starting to feel like the original mix of languages might have been the simplest option all along, particularly with GenAI tools

rasmus1610 · 3 months ago
Actually the abstractions are much thinner than with something like NextJS imo. It all comes down to what you are comfortable with. If you learned web dev in the React era, this approach feels very odd, but if you come from something like Ruby on Rails, this actually quite intuitive and not a lot of abstraction (see Jeremy‘s comment in this thread).

I personally like to stay with normal HTML and FrankenUI instead FastHTML instead of MonsterUI tho.

rasmus1610 commented on Ask HN: Has AI breathed new life into Semantic (web) Technologies?    · Posted by u/rottyguy
bjourne · 4 months ago
Quite the contrary. The idea behind the semantic web was to make content machine-readable by manually annotating it. For instance, this comment would have fields like "author", "date", "language", and maybe "ip" to make it interpretable to the machines. You don't need that because the machines can figure it out without the annotations. A run-of-the-mill computer vision model can tag an image much better and much more accurately than most humans.
rasmus1610 · 4 months ago
For the creation part of a KG I do understand this. But for inference and knowledge organisation, there is still value in graph based semantic structures imo
rasmus1610 commented on CT scans could cause 5% of cancers, study finds; experts note uncertainty   arstechnica.com/health/20... · Posted by u/pseudolus
bluGill · 4 months ago
Depends. MRI itself is safe, but they often add "contrast" which is known to cause cancer (I'm not clear on if there is more than one choice for contrast though, or if they all cause cancer). Of course contrast is mostly used when they looking at a something - likely a tumor that might or might not be cancer to decide how to treat it - in that case does it matter that your long term cancer prospects go up when without it your short term prospects are not good.
rasmus1610 · 4 months ago
There is no compelling evidence that MRI contrast agent causes cancer. Gadolinium (the stuff that’s in the contrast agent) can deposit in the body, e.g. in the brain, but if this even has any consequences is still unclear. Nonetheless there is some nice research going on how to drastically reduce the amount of contrast agent needs to be administered through image postprocessing.
rasmus1610 commented on Show HN: Arrakis – Open-source, self-hostable sandboxing service for AI Agents   github.com/abshkbh/arraki... · Posted by u/abshkbh
rasmus1610 · 5 months ago
The name checks out for a sandbox! Well done
rasmus1610 commented on Portable MRI Scans Patients for Signs of Stroke   spectrum.ieee.org/stroke-... · Posted by u/rbanffy
0xDEAFBEAD · 6 months ago
>when time is brain (i.e starting fibrinolytics)

Why not take fibrinolytics before the scan, just to be on the safe side? Ambulances could be equipped with fibrinolytics, for instance.

Is it because fibrinolytics could actually be harmful, depending on the stroke type?

rasmus1610 · 6 months ago
The same symptoms can be caused by either a blood clot OR by hemorrhage in the brain. If you give a patient with a hemorrhage fibrinolytics, you killed him. That’s why you need the CT first: to rule out bleeding.

u/rasmus1610

KarmaCake day109May 5, 2017View Original