Readit News logoReadit News
random3 commented on Ask HN: How do you find early stage startups to join    · Posted by u/gavino
random3 · 2 days ago
I think the most relevant is through your network, mainly because it’s generally a trust matter on both ends. It’s best when the deal is a known quantity vs looking over “who’s hiring monthly HN posts”.

I had 10-15 people i was working with (not all employed) at my last startup and they all came through my network either directly (ex colleagues) or through trusted parties.

Again it’s mostly a trust thing more than anything.

I think a good strategy is to get close to the kind of startups you care about without (before) direct intent to join. It’s easy to hang out (or at least it used to be) through various events, meetups or co-working places.

Many startups I didn’t join and could have been good, I’ve met through open-source (Hadoop, HBase, Mesos, etc.) these are companies like Cloudera, DataBricks etc. when they were tiny. I still miss that crowd, years later.

So it’s mostly a matter of being close to what’s happening, able to filter and ready to jump when opportunity arises.

random3 commented on Top pediatricians buck RFK Jr.'s anti-vaccine meddling on Covid shot guidance   arstechnica.com/health/20... · Posted by u/duxup
techpineapple · 5 days ago
Is there like a standardized risk scale for understanding odds in medicine? I mean, I probably have a 1 in a million chance of dying every month I choose to drive regularly, but if I were to argue with an anti-vaxxer, or try to determine my own risk tolerance, has someone developed a standardized way of understanding risk/odds? At what level do you say "This is a risky vaccine"?
random3 · 5 days ago
The beauty of odds is that, as ratios, they are universal and work the same in medicine as in sports betting or elections.
random3 commented on When you're asking AI chatbots for answers, they're data-mining you   theregister.com/2025/08/1... · Posted by u/rntn
rafark · 6 days ago
It’s not naive. The value these ai chatbots provide to me is extremely high.

I’ve been writing code for many years but one of the areas I wanted to improve was debugging, I’ve always printed variables but last month I decided to start using a debugger instead of logging to the console. For the past weeks I’ve only been using breakpoints and the resume program function because the step-into, over, out functions have always been confusing to me. An hour ago I sent Gemini images of my debugger and explained my problem and it actually told me what to do and it actually explained to me what the step-* functions did and it told me what to do step by step (I sent it a new screenshot after each step and told it to explain to me what was going on).

I now have a much better understanding of how debuggers work thanks to Gemini.

I’m fine with google getting my data, the value I just got was immense.

random3 · 6 days ago
I got that from your first post. As with every game context a win-win is only possible in non-zero sum with a relatively balanced benefit. It's clear that you can see the value you get and maybe even quantify it. However you can't quantify the other side, nor the degree to which its win will affect your win on a relatively short term (a few years tops).

Two things come to mind

The less relevant one, is that as a coder, once there's a good enough model (good enough = benefit/cost) your "win" will get to 0. And your contribution to what will make that win 0 is going to be non-0, but you're not going to get anything.

The more relevant one, longer term, is that you may end up being predictable (a good model of yourself) that will be able to extract value out of you personally forever, again without anything for you to gain.

Both may be argued against, or that they are unavoidable, regardless. But in either case, your "price point" has been arbitrarily chosen, at least from your perspective. I.e. it's not an informed choice on your end. A bit like the Monty Hall problem, you chose a door with little information. The act of sticking to the door you chose is why you're naive.

random3 commented on Show HN: Whispering – Open-source, local-first dictation you can trust   github.com/epicenter-so/e... · Posted by u/braden-w
random3 · 6 days ago
are there any non-Whisper-based voice models/tech/APIs?
random3 commented on Anna's Archive: An Update from the Team   annas-archive.org/blog/an... · Posted by u/jerheinze
max_ · 6 days ago
The entire internet needs to be re-designed to stand up against attacks.

- DDOS attacks

- Spamming

- UK like surveillance laws

- LLM scraping

Why is it that there is almost not initiative for this?

random3 · 6 days ago
"Be the change you want to see in the world"
random3 commented on When you're asking AI chatbots for answers, they're data-mining you   theregister.com/2025/08/1... · Posted by u/rntn
rafark · 6 days ago
Agreed. Not only do I think it’s worth it, i actually like that I can contribute. I’m getting so much good value for free I think it’s fair. It’s a win-win situation. The AIs get better and I get better answers.
random3 · 6 days ago
This is a funny take. I love your optimism, but it's so extremely naive, it should have a name.
random3 commented on Modifying other people's software   natkr.com/2025-08-14-modi... · Posted by u/todsacerdoti
skydhash · 7 days ago
Maybe I can't understand what TFA is describing, but from what I know a patch is usually tied to a specific commit, so a very specific point of time in the upstream lifetime. It does not make sense to have it lingering longer than that. Even in the case when you want to maintain a set of patches (package building,...) you usually revise it every new version of the software. In this case, the intent is much more important than the how (which quickly become history).
random3 · 7 days ago
You’re thinking a patch is text, but should think of it as a logical change. Unless the logic becomes part of upstream the patch is not tied to a specific point in “time”. There’s a cost to it, as you have to constantly rebase. This is the case with any non-vanilla distribution (e.g. Linux), although it’s also at a package level so you do this both for each package as well across every package. For well written code there’s reasonably low coupling so it’s less work to maintain.
random3 commented on Is a corporation a slave? Many philosophers think so   theconversation.com/is-a-... · Posted by u/hhs
Nihilartikel · 8 days ago
In circles of occult technology, a corporation would simply be understood as an "Egregore". Which is itself might be considered a slave of its constituents, but no more than they are a slave of the collective will.

Am I a slave to my cells? Are my cells a slave of 'me' (whatever 'me' is)?

random3 · 8 days ago
A slave of its constituents seems an incorrect angle. Like you’d be a slave of your organs. Granted, you can bend definitions (which is the case here, regardless) but the slave of constituents is wrong from a causal model perspective.
random3 commented on SaaS Is Dead   shayne.dev/blog/saas-is-d... · Posted by u/mooreds
borzi · 10 days ago
What I'm saying about the "ideas" is that they are entirely based on a delusion which is stated as a fact, but only because the author has a strong incentive to believe the delusion.
random3 · 9 days ago
So he's delusional because he thinks users may be inclined to not pay for SaaS products when they can solve their need by asking an AI for close to free?
random3 commented on SaaS Is Dead   shayne.dev/blog/saas-is-d... · Posted by u/mooreds
siva7 · 10 days ago
Well, their point has much more substance than your "this is ad hominem" slur since the blog author didn't disclose that his opinion piece is directly tied to the business model of his startup (and therefore wants to sell you the solution so they are clearly biased). Some people may therefore feel deceived.
random3 · 9 days ago
> blog author didn't disclose that his opinion piece is directly tied to the business model of his startup

You mean other than stating in the "About" section of his *blog*?

You seem to be confusing blogging "standards" with conflict of interest disclosures for research publications and see a problem with founders being subjective by actually having an overlap in their beliefs and their companies.

u/random3

KarmaCake day836April 19, 2014
About
Math, computer science, distributed systems, analytics, fintech automation. Startup founder.

https://twitter.com/clehene

View Original