I thought the entire game these guys are playing is rushing to market to collect more data to diversify their supply chain from the stolen data they've used to train their current model. Sure, certain enterprise use cases might have different legal requirements, but certainly the core product and the average "import openai"-enjoyer.
Becuase they are bound by their terms of service? Because if they won't no business would ever use their service and without businesses using their service they won't have any revenue?
May I suggest that everyone just drop this whole 'develop/program it once, run it everywhere' slogan that just gets repeated endlessly when people try to promote their new platform/framework/library or whatever? I've never seen it work out that way in practice. Never. All individual platforms have their own features, unique quirks and distinct, platform specific bugs and trying to abstract over all the platform specific stuff means you end up with either low-quality, or low-feature implementation that comes close to being usable, but still never quite USEFUL.
Even the web browser, the only one that ever came close to fulfilling that promise, still requires fixing or accounting for browser-specific implementation bugs or quirks or non-standard feature additions/omissions. The closest you can get is just ignore Firefox, Safari and just target Chromium-based browsers, OR just use a subset of the latest web standards.
Considering how scrolling itself is entirely broken on the cogentcore website itself (I'm on desktop Chrome and my mousewheel and 3rd button scrolling doesn't work), it's not inspiring that they couldn't get something basic like scrolling to work. Is it not possible to just delegate scrolling behaviour to the browser?
Many apps that make hundreds of millions of dollars in revenue and have millions of users are built on cross platform technologies. (IntelliJ IDEs for example, and many Mobile apps which use same code for iOS and Android, Cursor, VS Code, etc). People use these apps even though they are not platform native and some of them have die hard fans too.
Kudos to the CogentCore team to build and ship this! Looks like this is made by a 2 people team. That's a lot of work to pull off!
I personally wanted something like this for Go for a while! Will try it out.
Q: who won the cricket worldcup 2023?
A: The *2023 ICC Cricket World Cup* was won by *Australia*. They defeated *New Zealand* in the final on *November 19, 2023*, at the *M. A. Chidambaram Stadium in Chennai, India*.
### Key Details: - *Final Score*: Australia scored *334/5* in their 50 overs, while New Zealand reached *199/8* in their chase. - *Man of the Match*: Pat Cummins (Australia) with 5 wickets for 34 runs. - *Tournament Host*: India. - *Notable Performance*: Australia's aggressive batting and disciplined bowling sealed the victory, marking their *sixth Cricket World Cup title* (tying them with West Indies for the most titles).
This was the 13th edition of the ICC Cricket World Cup (50-over format). The T20 World Cup is a separate tournament, with India winning the 2024 edition. Let me know if you need further details!
total duration: 34.911890735s load duration: 65.034584ms prompt eval count: 20 token(s) prompt eval duration: 305.460537ms prompt eval rate: 65.47 tokens/s eval count: 511 token(s) eval duration: 34.539660654s eval rate: 14.79 tokens/s
Comment: Wrong - https://www.espncricinfo.com/series/icc-cricket-world-cup-20...
Q: give last 10 movies to win the oscar best picture award
Here is a clear and accurate list of the *last 10 Best Picture winners* at the Academy Awards, from *2014 to 2023*, including the ceremony year, the winning film, and the film's release year:
---
1. *2023 (95th Oscars)* - *Winner*: Everything Everywhere All at Once - *Release Year*: 2022
2. *2022 (94th Oscars)* - *Winner*: The Power of the Dog - *Release Year*: 2021
3. *2021 (93rd Oscars)* - *Winner*: Nomadland - *Release Year*: 2020
4. *2020 (92nd Oscars)* - *Winner*: Parasite - *Release Year*: 2019
5. *2019 (91st Oscars)* - *Winner*: Green Book - *Release Year*: 2018
6. *2018 (90th Oscars)* - *Winner*: The Shape of Water - *Release Year*: 2017
7. *2017 (89th Oscars)* - *Winner*: Moonlight - *Release Year*: 2016
8. *2016 (88th Oscars)* - *Winner*: Spotlight - *Release Year*: 2015
9. *2015 (87th Oscars)* - *Winner*: 12 Years a Slave - *Release Year*: 2013
10. *2014 (86th Oscars)* - *Winner*: Argo - *Release Year*: 2012
Comment: Answer number 2 ans 9 are wrong. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Academy_Award_for_Best_Picture)
I would have expected it to get things which are such big events right at least.
> The content covered by the court order is stored separately in a secure system. It’s protected under legal hold, meaning it can’t be accessed or used for purposes other than meeting legal obligations.
> Only a small, audited OpenAI legal and security team would be able to access this data as necessary to comply with our legal obligations.
So, by OpenAI's own admission, they are taking abundant and presumably effective steps to protect user privacy here? In the unlikely event that this data did somehow leak, I'd personally be blaming OpenAI, not the NYT.
Some of the other language in this post, like repeatedly calling the lawsuit "baseless", really makes this just read like an unconvincing attempt at a spin piece. Nothing to see here.
I don't think the Judge is equipped to handle this case if they don't understand how their order jeopardies the privacy of millions of users worldwide who don't even care about NYT's content or bypassing their paywalls.