Readit News logoReadit News
peach45 commented on How to be more productive without forcing yourself   deprocrastination.co/blog... · Posted by u/vitabenes
peach45 · 5 years ago
This seems like cheap advice that's trying to get me to buy into a lifestyle in order to sell me things.

"Have less exposure towards super fun things". "Get bored". These describe the same general concept as dopamine fasting. The third bullet point can be reduced to "focus on what you have to do, until you can focus on it" which is circular.

I'm not buying in. Maybe I'm getting old but "failure to start" is starting to sound like a meme to me perpetuated by vultures trying to exploit creative personalities, hackers included.

I think what we need to do, is to step back and appreciate ourselves for the effort we continually expect from ourselves. As hackers in one way or another, we are constantly putting up our ego as collateral in order to take on challenges that threaten to knock us down a peg or two if we fail. For many of us, failure is a threat to the core of our identity, yet we dive on in anyway. Exhaustion from that sort of loop is to be expected.

Most people don't live like this. Most people reduce the flux in their lives instead of seeking to increase it. Why? Because most people cherish their egos to the point where they cannot commit to a goal with an uncertain outcome. They would rather work a 9-5, which is fine, but it doesn't describe our community. We are addicted to risk if it means building something new and that we can call our own.

So appreciate yourselves more.

And get better sleep.

peach45 commented on “I will slaughter you”   daniel.haxx.se/blog/2021/... · Posted by u/ingve
peach45 · 5 years ago
> You built a formula 1 race car and tossed the keys to kids with ego problems.

I laughed. Curl: The Formula 1 race car of command line tools!

Aside from that, I am surprised that the harasser followed up in a mostly non-violent way. I expected an absolute troll. Sadly in fact it seems the harasser is in need of psychiatric attention.

peach45 commented on Why is it so hard to see code from 5 minutes ago?   web.eecs.utk.edu/~azh/blo... · Posted by u/azhenley
trashme · 5 years ago
> Also the second rendition makes doesn't include what the rest of the joggers are doing ...

Something is amiss here.

peach45 · 5 years ago
Karma/backlash for my rude post. I will leave it unedited, but s/makes// in case it is not clear.
peach45 commented on Why is it so hard to see code from 5 minutes ago?   web.eecs.utk.edu/~azh/blo... · Posted by u/azhenley
jonnycomputer · 5 years ago
When making changes to a block of code or block of text, I frequently just comment out the code and rewrite it anew. I might copy-paste existing code (just to avoid stupid transcription errors). If its too large to see both what I'm writing, and the old code, at the same time, I just use two windows on the same file.

This is relevant to writing fiction or non-fiction as well.

For example, I didn't like this, so I commented out:

>though his companions jogged just behind him, he would have barely seen them at all had he look. They ran, with their heads down, attentive only to their feet slapping the muddy earth, tracking the path they followed, their breath ragged.

and wrote this, using the commented-out text as a reference:

The fog was now so dense that he could see nothing ahead of him. He ran with his head down, breath ragged, attentive only to his feet slapping the muddy earth, tracking their path. His companions followed close behind.

peach45 · 5 years ago
Shouldn't it be "had he looked."? Also the second rendition makes doesn't include what the rest of the joggers are doing, yet the first one does. Not sure if intentional.

At first I gasped at your practice, because I never do that, but I see the point now. Mastery of language.

peach45 commented on Changes to LastPass Free   blog.lastpass.com/2021/02... · Posted by u/seng
peach45 · 5 years ago
peach45 commented on Supermicro Hack: China Exploited a US Tech Supplier over Years [2021 Follow-Up]   bloomberg.com/features/20... · Posted by u/kenneth
gbin · 5 years ago
Can anyone show us any code? Or an actual chip? Cool infographics don't cut it for me after the first time around with this.
peach45 · 5 years ago
//They showed an actual chip last time[1] but it seemed to me that it couldn't possibly house the logic necessary for data exfiltration. It looked like some sort of voltage conditioner. I am not an electrical engineer though.

//https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2018-10-04/the-big-h...

Edit: now it is obvious to me that these were artistic renditions and not photos of any chip. Disregard the above.

peach45 commented on Short fat engineers are undervalued   nested.substack.com/p/sho... · Posted by u/atticusberg
peach45 · 5 years ago
This is shortsighted. The reason deep knowledge is more valuable is that learning anything stops being fun, and therefore presents less of a biological pull, after the first few milestones. There's a logarithmic decay in reward to effort put in. So naturally you're going to want engineers that have put in the hard work to build their knowledge, rather than the posers who read about engineering but never actually got into the nitty gritty. Why? Because it becomes rare, and scarcity drives up value. Simple!

EXAMPLE: Why would I care if my plumber also moonlights as a surgeon if all I care about is getting my faucet fixed without him passing the buck due to perceived complexity?

Those things are great in a dinner party setting, but in the professional workplace you want professionals not dabblers. Whenever I meet a self styled "generalist" nowadays I scoff. It's not hard to read HN daily and pick up on the lingo and memes and fake your way to 99% of a "generalist" in both knowledge and impression, but that doesn't make one a good engineer.

u/peach45

KarmaCake day85February 13, 2021View Original