Readit News logoReadit News
onesociety2022 commented on From $479 to $2,800 a month for ACA health insurance next year   npr.org/sections/shots-he... · Posted by u/laurex
cornholio · 3 days ago
I think there is credible research that US drug costs are primarily the result of a fragmented market and lack of collective bargaining. So a single buyer regime will by itself lower the prices since manufacturers will be forced to compete among themselves based on price and an objective metric of the therapeutic benefit - as opposed to marketing and the best sales network and "conference" benefits the prescribing physicians.

For example, if the generic option reduces the burden of disease by 10 DALYs and costs essentially ~0$ it will be fully covered, any other patented option with a 15 DALY average benefit will be covered up to a financial ceiling given by the total funding available and the extra 5DALY benefit it brings. A patented option that does not fit that ceiling will require patients to pay from their pocket, therefore cratering sales, therefore strongly incentivizing the pharmaceutical company to lower the price to fit the ceiling.

This is how other advanced countries lower spending on drugs without infringing on intellectual property - by forcing all manufacturers of all drugs for all diseases to compete on price, or risk selling basically nothing in that country until their patents expire. Since the marginal production cost of drugs is close to zero, it' always better to have some sales at some lower prices instead of no sales at a very profitable price.

onesociety2022 · a day ago
The question is why haven’t they already done this type of cost control with existing Medicare? People aged 65 and over are incredibly lucrative for Big Pharma and medical industry as a whole because by definition they will incur a lot of medical problems due to their age and need a lot of medication. So it’s a lucrative segment of the market that they can’t afford to lose. So the US govt should be in a great position to negotiate on costs but it doesn’t look like they have done much at all.

I think in a way Americans are actually subsidizing pharmaceuticals for consumers in other countries because pharmaceutical companies are willing to sell the same product for less to them because as you said their marginal production costs are minimal and they have already recuperated a great return on their R&D investment from American consumers.

onesociety2022 commented on From $479 to $2,800 a month for ACA health insurance next year   npr.org/sections/shots-he... · Posted by u/laurex
chatmasta · 3 days ago
Universal healthcare is supported by something like 60 or 70% of Americans. Don’t be fooled by those trying to make it into a party issue.

Agreed, it’s crazy. Making healthcare contingent on employment is barbaric but aligned with other practices (like W2 tax withholding) where the government effectively deputizes your employer to enforce the civic contract.

onesociety2022 · 3 days ago
I would support universal healthcare if I think the government is actually capable of reigning in the avg healthcare costs of an American.

I’d bet the $800/mo eyedrops this poor lady is relying on don’t cost that much in any other country (and I don’t mean poor countries - I mean in other rich countries like Japan, Singapore or Australia). So when she switches to Medicare as soon as she turns 65, how much are the US taxpayers paying for these eyedrops? It’s just wealth transfer from US taxpayers to the US medical industry complex.

So I fear “Medicare for All” would simply mean we pay even more taxes than we already do now and the US government will keep spending insane amounts of money on healthcare as compared to every other developed nation in the world with no better outcomes.

onesociety2022 commented on The warning signs the AI bubble is about to burst   telegraph.co.uk/business/... · Posted by u/taimurkazmi
onesociety2022 · 3 days ago
Even if AGI never happens, the existing models are already incredibly useful. I’ve switched to OpenAI Plus plan and almost never use Google search anymore. I pay $10/mo for GitHub Copilot for coding. So search and coding use cases are already seeing big improvements. But this same thing needs to happen to pretty much every product. So I think in the worst case they can just divert all of the training resources to just inference and be just fine. Sure the insane valuation multiples will drop if that happens and they will be valued as any other SaaS business.
onesociety2022 commented on Scammers unleash flood of online gaming sites   krebsonsecurity.com/2025/... · Posted by u/todsacerdoti
technothrasher · a month ago
I've got a coworker who fell for, "You won a free electric drill from Home Depot! Click here and enter your credit card". I discovered his predicament when he was telling me how he managed to get an overseas vendor to agree to reduce a credit card charge he didn't recognize in half. That got me to pull a bit on the thread and the whole story unraveled. What it came down to, apparently, was simple gullibility. He didn't know if the drill prize was legit, but he just didn't think he would be targeted in a scam, so he figured, "Why not? Worst that happens is I don't get my drill."
onesociety2022 · 25 days ago
But all he had to do in this case was dispute the fraudulent charge on his credit card? Credit cards in that sense are a lot safer than anything crypto - you have the opportunity to dispute and reverse the transaction. And it's easy to do as well - it just takes a couple of seconds to login to the credit card website and file the dispute.
onesociety2022 commented on Cloudflare to introduce pay-per-crawl for AI bots   blog.cloudflare.com/intro... · Posted by u/scotchmi_st
__MatrixMan__ · 2 months ago
Because conventional transaction processors can be compelled to shut off payments to publishers whose content offends the powerful. Just look at what happened to wikileaks.
onesociety2022 · 2 months ago
Crypto is not going to save you there. If some country like India wants to ban content from some publishers, they can do so by just asking their ISPs to ban all traffic to said publishers. Whether the publisher accepts micropayments on crypto rails or conventional rails is immaterial. They are not going to be able to distribute their content anymore and hence not get paid either.
onesociety2022 commented on Cloudflare to introduce pay-per-crawl for AI bots   blog.cloudflare.com/intro... · Posted by u/scotchmi_st
davkan · 2 months ago
Well in my case the value is not there at their price which includes YouTube music as a separate service that must be maintained and I assume separate licensing as well. I’m not interested in paying for access to that side of the service. I have little doubt that the access to YouTube music adds to the sticker price of their bundle. They are not simply passing along bundled costs, they are also targeting what they think consumers are willing to pay. I think they’ve miscalculated in this case.
onesociety2022 · 2 months ago
I normally would subscribe to Apple Music, but I switched to Youtube Premium because I get Youtube Music with the added benefit of no ads on regular Youtube. It seems like their bundling trick worked on me as they expected.
onesociety2022 commented on The Right to Repair Is Law in Washington State   eff.org/deeplinks/2025/06... · Posted by u/doener
dgb23 · 3 months ago
What's the purpose of that other than making it harder to repair? Is there any good faith argument to made made here?
onesociety2022 · 3 months ago
Security measure - otherwise someone can intercept your MacBook during delivery, replace the original component with a fake one that has a backdoor and ship it to you and you start using it completely oblivious to the fact it has been hacked.
onesociety2022 commented on High tariffs become 'real' with our first $36K bill   blog.adafruit.com/2025/05... · Posted by u/ptorrone
hattmall · 4 months ago
But how do you even know if it's actually higher quality. I find that expensive stuff breaks just as readily as cheap stuff in many cases. Speaking to dishwashers specifically in my rentals I've found that pretty much they all have similar flaws. The $1500 Bosch doesn't last longer or clean better than the $300 Frigidaire. What I've learned is that the best is to get the cheapest, but popular model with the decibel rating you want. Samsung Stormwash has been the best for me because the replacement parts are readily available. The cheaper models they keep changing parts every 6 months so it's more difficult to replace them.
onesociety2022 · 4 months ago
You would find them the same way you find any good products today (word of mouth, product reviews, etc). But currently consumers don’t care so much about the longevity of any product or its repairability because throwing it away and getting a new one is the more economical choice. Manufacturers instead focus on gimmicky or useless features while not focusing on reliability. If disposing an item to a landfill is made to be expensive, then consumers will start making different choices and manufacturers will change their products to meet their needs.
onesociety2022 commented on High tariffs become 'real' with our first $36K bill   blog.adafruit.com/2025/05... · Posted by u/ptorrone
RiverCrochet · 4 months ago
Something my half-brother said ...

"Cheap foreign products are a necessity when so-called American companies don't love Americans enough to pay them what they're worth. It's the whole reason things went overseas in the first place. It's gonna be nice if we can finally get American companies to actually support America and pay citizens what they're worth."

The above sounds nice, but it's oversimplified, like a lot of political rhetoric recently. Now, if this does end up making real living wages for the American worker a commonplace thing, that's awesome, but I'm pessimistic given the history of things, how money can influence politics, and how corporate lawyers can find loopholes.

onesociety2022 · 4 months ago
I'm not sure if it would pan out like how your half-brother wants it to be. Let's assume the manufacturing jobs return here and you are getting paid American wages. But if you try to turn around and spend it on anything, it will just be more expensive because everything else you want to buy is also being made in US factories and those workers are also getting pay similar to yours? You might have a manufacturing job finally but now you are paying $350 for a Nike shoe that used to be $150 when it was made in China. You want to buy a new TV? It costs more now. You want to upgrade your old iPhone? It costs more now.

So will the American manufacturing wages actually translate to living wages or will you just be getting paid more on paper but you still feel poor because the things you want to buy are all more expensive now?

onesociety2022 commented on High tariffs become 'real' with our first $36K bill   blog.adafruit.com/2025/05... · Posted by u/ptorrone
nrclark · 4 months ago
I won't defend these tariffs, or their rollout. But I will say that our dependence on Chinese manufacturing (and engineering, these days) is not good for our nation.

Free trade combined with cheap labor led to a massive loss of national capability. We outsourced 75% of the supply chain for electronics, and provided decades of free training to foreign companies. Then we pulled a surprised mug when those same companies decided that they don't need us any more.

As a parent of young kids, I'm also keenly aware of how much random plastic garbage we import - just to throw it away after maybe one use. Party favors are a big one. Families are drowning in low-cost, low-quality products that wind up in a landfill. Free trade created this situation, and I don't think it's good for anybody except importers and factory owners.

I don't know what the solution is, and the current tariffs clearly aren't it. But free trade with China hasn't exactly been great for the US in a longterm sense, and we shouldn't pretend otherwise just because we're getting cheap consumer goods.

onesociety2022 · 4 months ago
If your goal is to prevent cheap throw-away items from ending up in landfills, there's a straight-forward policy the Govt could adopt - just make it very expensive to send stuff to landfills (and stop the practice of sending our garbage to poor countries where it just ends polluting rivers and oceans).

This would encourage people to buy only high-quality items that are longer-lasting and are not just discarded very quickly. If it costs $200 to discard your dishwasher, maybe you will buy a high-quality product that might have a higher sticker price upfront but it has better reliability and won't break down quickly requiring you to replace it and therefore pay the hefty landfill price. This in turn would encourage manufacturers to build products with better reliability.

u/onesociety2022

KarmaCake day46September 7, 2022View Original