Readit News logoReadit News
oceliker commented on GPT-5.1: A smarter, more conversational ChatGPT   openai.com/index/gpt-5-1/... · Posted by u/tedsanders
trogdor · a month ago
I just changed my ChatGPT personality setting to “Efficient.” It still starts every response with “Yeah, definitely! Let’s talk about that!” — or something similarly inefficient.

So annoying.

oceliker · a month ago
Did you start a new chat? It doesn't apply to existing chats (probably because it works through the system prompt). I have been using the Robot (Efficient) setting for a while and never had a response like that.
oceliker commented on “The closer to the train station, the worse the kebab” – a “study”   jmspae.se/write-ups/kebab... · Posted by u/TeMPOraL
Etheryte · 10 months ago
I mean, it's not true in general if you actually read the article.

> Whilst there are some minor indications that the hypothesis could be correct (eg. many of the absolute worst restaurants being some of the closest) the correlation is simply too weak.

oceliker · 10 months ago
> it's not true in general if you actually read the article.

Only if you agree with the article's methodology :)

oceliker commented on Florida's DeSantis signs law restricting social media for people under 16   reuters.com/world/us/flor... · Posted by u/hotdailys
csnover · 2 years ago
> I think few people have any doubts about social media being a net negative for young people.

They should have doubts. This position is not supported by the currently available evidence[0][1][2]. The APA’s position paper makes this explicit: “Using social media is not inherently beneficial or harmful to young people.”

So long as focus remains on scapegoating ‘social media’ as the main cause of suffering, we will never solve the problem. The negative aspects of social media apply to young and old equally, and as far as I can tell are largely manifestations of deeper societal issues that have festered for generations.

[0] https://www.apa.org/topics/social-media-internet/health-advi...

[1] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8221420/

[2] https://www.oii.ox.ac.uk/news-events/no-evidence-screen-time...

oceliker · 2 years ago
> The APA’s position paper makes this explicit: “Using social media is not inherently beneficial or harmful to young people.”

I think this is just saying that social media is still part of society, and so there is nothing inherently bad in using social media, which is just an extension of our offline lives. That doesn't mean it's not harmful - if the offline life is harmful, social media can amplify it.

> The negative aspects of social media apply to young and old equally

The APA paper is filled with warnings specifically about adolescent social media use:

> ...potential risks are likely to be greater in early adolescence — a period of greater biological, social, and psychological transitions...

> Parental monitoring... and developmentally appropriate limit-setting... is critical, especially in early adolescence.

> Evidence suggests that exposure to maladaptive behavior may promote similar behavior among vulnerable youth, and online social reinforcement of these behaviors may be related to increased risk for serious psychological symptoms, even after controlling for offline influences.

> Research demonstrates that adolescents’ exposure to online discrimination and hate predicts increases in anxiety and depressive symptoms, even after controlling for how much adolescents are exposed to similar experiences offline.

> Data indicate that technology use particularly within one hour of bedtime, and social media use in particular, is associated with sleep disruptions. Insufficient sleep is associated with disruptions to neurological development in adolescent brains, teens’ emotional functioning, and risk for suicide.

> Research suggests that using social media for social comparisons related to physical appearance... [is] related to poorer body image, disordered eating, and depressive symptoms, particularly among girls.

oceliker commented on Cellular outage in U.S. hits AT&T, T-Mobile and Verizon users   cnbc.com/2024/02/22/cellu... · Posted by u/rooooob
BuckYeah · 2 years ago
Different bands could be affected differently if it is solar radiation related. Same exact model of phone?
oceliker · 2 years ago
Same year, different size (13 and 13 Pro Plus)
oceliker commented on Cellular outage in U.S. hits AT&T, T-Mobile and Verizon users   cnbc.com/2024/02/22/cellu... · Posted by u/rooooob
oceliker · 2 years ago
This is so odd. I have two phones with AT&T currently sitting right next to each other. One has service, the other is in SOS mode.
oceliker commented on Android’s emergency call shortcut is flooding dispatchers with false calls   arstechnica.com/gadgets/2... · Posted by u/PaulHoule
andsoitis · 2 years ago
Do I need to turn on the microwave with the phone inside it? This is an honest question because I don't know anything about microwave signals (I could google/research), but my instinct tells me I probably shouldn't turn on the microwave with the phone inside it, though I don't know for sure what will happen (explode?)
oceliker · 2 years ago
No, a Faraday cage does not require power (just grounding).
oceliker commented on Big Tech Resumed Hiring Foreign Workers Just Weeks After Layoffs   leefang.com/p/big-tech-re... · Posted by u/AndrewKemendo
estebank · 3 years ago
After living and working in a place for 10 years you no longer have "a place to go back," the new place is your home, regardless of whether USCIS and US immigration laws categorize you as a "non-resident alien."

Uprooting people's lives, including that of US nationals (10 years is long enough to meet someone and have kids, even people that do not have a US citizenship or permanent residence either) is not humane. Visa holders have since 2017 a 60 days "grace period" in which H1B Visa holders have to find a new job, while L1 visa holders have that time to pack up and leave.

oceliker · 3 years ago
Small nit, anybody who stayed in the US for 10 years is very unlikely to be a nonresident alien (which is mainly an IRS tax classification and doesn’t have much to do with having an immigrant visa)

source: current resident alien

oceliker commented on Big Tech Resumed Hiring Foreign Workers Just Weeks After Layoffs   leefang.com/p/big-tech-re... · Posted by u/AndrewKemendo
gknapp · 3 years ago
That is the requirement. The law applies standards to ensure that domestic workers aren't adversely impacted by the hiring of foreign workers. This includes putting essentially bogus ads in newspaper classifieds, and requires that they're paying the same to H1-B workers in the same role as a domestic worker, among other comical things.

The program has defacto evolved to one in which the US can tap into a skilled global labor market to increase competition for roles, without paying too much attention to the actual legal requirements.

Sources:

(Like many here, I've written a few H1-B role requisition documents - which are often designed to be so ludicrously specific that it would be almost impossible to find anyone to fill that role, save for the one person applying for the visa)

[0] https://www.dol.gov/agencies/whd/immigration/h1b

[1] https://www.boundless.com/immigration-resources/the-h-1b-vis...

oceliker · 3 years ago
Are you sure you are not conflating this with PERM? H-1B only requires a prevailing wage determination. There is no “ludicrously specific” job description, nor a requirement to post ads (just a notice at the workplace).

u/oceliker

KarmaCake day1083July 8, 2015View Original