Readit News...and now you have to greatly scale up your backend infrastructure to be able to handle all those open connections to handle each and every single active user.
There's also some kind of weird input-capture stopping keyboard scrolling at first, and the video player is some weird thing I can't see how to make work.
background-color: black !important;
There's also some kind of weird input-capture stopping keyboard scrolling at first, and the video player is some weird thing I can't see how to make work.
Dead Comment
Note that the http-equiv refresh will only trigger after the page is fully-loaded, which long-polling does not allows to happen, so you do have resilience for the case where the long-poll is interrupted mysteriously.
If you aren't doing something useful with the text, you're best off passing a byte-sequence through unchanged. Unfortunately, Microsoft Windows exists, so sometimes you have to pass `char16_t` sequences through instead.
The worst part about UTF-16 is that invalid UTF-16 is fundamentally different than invalid UTF-8. When translating between them (really: when transforming external data into an internal form for processing), the former can use WTF-8 whereas the latter can use Python-style surrogateescape, but you can't mix these.
Why would you use Google as a thesaurus in the first place? Why not go directly to the Cambridge or Merriam-Webster thesaurus (the article even links to Merriam-Webster):
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/thesaurus/
https://www.merriam-webster.com/
The internet may well be turning to shit but people also need to take responsibility for their own abdication of thinking.
As for antonyms, good luck finding anything at all.
So, using additional tools, even if not designed for the task, is often useful.
Absolutely, 100% incorrect. You obviously don't approve of 4chan's content or mission, but that's not the point. It benefits everyone when anyone takes a stand because their legal rights are under attack.
"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."
>This is not a slippery slope
Again, incorrect.
Any type of punishment for 4chan due to their legal content is damn close to the definition of "slippery slope". You're familiar with the "anti-slippery slope" argument already ("First they came for 4chan and I said nothing, because good riddance!"), so you're obviously cogent enough to understand what you're saying.
>The sheer anarchy of the libertarian mindset that much of this site supports is not a good thing.
This is not for you to decide. Your mindset is why free speech laws must exist in the first place.
Instead they seem to have conflated B with A. Maybe they are afraid that any criticism on this method is interpreted as attack on doing anything at all for kids watching porn on the internet or even twisted into some kind of endorsement.
In all fairness, I have seen quite a few people explicitly arguing "I want kids to watch porn" of late.
This does limit what you can do with the poll-added content, but simply allowing the refresh to take place is a strict improvement over refreshing eagerly.