Readit News We may also optimize video streaming quality to 480p (DVD quality).
I've been running 0.4.0 since it came out for this feature.
Also I recommend you check out coc.vim for the best completer. It uses the same language server protocol that VS Code uses (and many of the plugins for coc.vim are forked fr VS Code plugins)
You also have to be more clever to pack information in a smaller section (typically < 100x100 character space), and you avoid unnecessary graphics that are distracting.
If you want to build CLIs without the JIT overhead, you can compile your Julia code: https://github.com/JuliaLang/PackageCompiler.jl
It's not just alternate skin for JSON, and yet that's what most people use it for. Some users also want things like map keys that aren't strings, which is actually pretty useful.
I recall there being CoffeeScript Object Notation as well... perhaps that would've been better for many use cases, all things said.
If someone can keep up in a technical conversation about their background with me and answer every question I have about a technical project they did, then basically they pass. It works especially well even if I'm not familiar with their project, because I have an opportunity to learn, so I can ask any question that comes to mind until they teach me what they learned.
I did hire someone that I regretted, though, but to be fair, this was among my first interviews. The mistake I made was getting too easily caught talking about programming and technical things without specifically diving deep into his past project. He and I vibed quickly and I liked him, and that felt like enough, but after only a week it seemed obvious that he wasn't going to be producing much code, and we let him go. Otherwise, I've been happy and my ability to discern has only gotten better as I became more experienced.
I got a little offtopic, but my main answer to your question was "if the company leaves the decision up to a majority of engineers saying 'yes', then a lot of companies do this." Google does this, the startups I've worked at do this, and some of my friends companies do this.
This may just mean that you say a lot Of wrong “No”s. To get very high precision or very high recall is really easy... what you must measure is your F-score
I would be dollars to doughnuts that the author of that site and the editors of that "wiki" have made or thought worse things at some point, but because they have not reached a certain level of celebrity, there's no dossier on them. It's truly ridiculous to me the amount of effort spent on trying to claw others down.
I accept that inequality exists and perhaps RMS has some awful opinions, but if that's the case then just ignore him.
If there are people who are choosing to make it incumbent upon themselves to take down these "problematic" individuals, then it must be because they think that all of the systems that have allowed a person to continue to exist despite those opinions must be unreliable in adequately judging them. If that's the case, then wouldn't it be more practical to fix the endemic problem rather than destroy a single person? I'm guessing that the latter is just easier to do and more profitable as well. You gain "credibility" by attacking someone else, so it's difficult to believe that they are doing it for altruistic means.
All in all, I'm pretty sick of this nonsense. A world where everyone is constantly being watched by eachother and reported on is already too authoritarian for me to want to continue living in, not to mention the already authoritarian governments doing the same.