Blog post from the creator: https://www.john-rush.com/posts/agent-streams-20260101.html
Readit Newsnoodlescb commented on Agent-Streams: Skeptical Overseer for Long-Running Coding Agents github.com/john-b-rush/ag... · Posted by u/noodlescb
Deleted Comment
Not to be too ageist but the author appears to be a Stanford college student? Interesting thoughts but also feels kind of naive in that it is using a lot of assumption of a logical market, which is kind of adorable in a world where investing has devolved into a hype gambling market where Tesla has become a meme stock.
I tend to have auto-accept on for edits, and once Claude is done with a task I'll just use git to review and stage the changes, sometimes commit them when it's a logical spot for it.
I wouldn't want to have Claude auto-commit everything it does (because I sometimes revert its changes), nor would I want to YOLO it without any git repo... This seems like a nice tool, but for someone who has a very different workflow.
Yeah I basically have Claude commit via git regularly and the majority of the other features described her can be done via git. I agree it's a neat idea for someone though.
noodlescb commented on Are OpenAI and Anthropic losing money on inference? martinalderson.com/posts/... · Posted by u/martinald
https://www.axios.com/2025/08/15/sam-altman-gpt5-launch-chat... quotes Sam Altman saying:
> Most of what we're building out at this point is the inference [...] We're profitable on inference. If we didn't pay for training, we'd be a very profitable company.
Except these tech billionaires lie the most of the time. This is still the "grow at any cost" phase, so I don't even genuinely believe he has a confident understanding of how or at what point anything will be profitable. This just strikes me as the best answer he has at the moment.