What is McKinsey infiltration?
Basically: You have a problem; Oracle/SAP says they'll solve it for you. Now you have a second problem; they say McKinsey'll solve it for you. Now you have …
The chain expects that the prices it has to pay (!) for goods are rising 20-50% in the coming weeks (!). Aldi is expected on monday (today) to rise some (!) of ALDI prices significantly (!) - for meat, butter, ...
Einkaufspreis = ALDI buys things, the prices ALDI pays -> expected to rise 20%-50% in the coming weeks
Verkaufspreis = ALDI sells things, the prices consumers have to pay -> some prices already are expected to rise significantly on monday
[0] https://www.sphinx-doc.org [1] https://www.sphinx-doc.org/en/master/usage/extensions/napole... [2] https://myst-parser.readthedocs.io/en/latest/sphinx/intro.ht...
Previous discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19871207
However, it seems like that explains why we needed Windows drivers, but not why device-specific Linux drivers are a thing? Unless the implication is that manufacturers who needed to make custom drivers anyway didn't bother to make their devices class compliant?
Remind me again where is the Musée de la Demoscene? Must be one in Finland, no? This sort of thing should be featured.
IMHO that's actually not a big deal. From a comment I made in 2020 [0]:
> That's what I was concerned about before I played through one of the three campaigns a few years ago — that the UI would seem unbearable after having played a lot of Warcraft 3 and Starcraft 2. I found it actually quite OK after learning the keyboard shortcuts (of the Dos version). What actually ruined it for me and made me not want to play the other campaigns is the poor AI. Easy enemies would have been alright; I'm not that good at RTS games anyway and being able to finish each level on the first try was nice. But the opponents are so exceptionally stupid that it just got boring.
So, yes, the controls seem silly from a modern point of view, but they're far from the critical issue that prevents the game from being enjoyable.
By the way, there's a grave mistake in my old comment. I had written:
> Dune Legacy lets you play the campaigns, not just single-player skirmish, against its improved AIs. I just tried selecting ‘hard’ and (with game speed at maximum) got completely wrecked on the second map. Wonderful!
As I played more of the campaign in Dune Legacy, it turned out that the AI is even worse than in the original game. I only thought it was ‘wonderful’ because it attacked my base-under-construction with most of its preexisting army as soon as I gave my presence away too early on. But once I switched my strategy to build more stuff in secret before attacking, it turned out that the AI just sat there uselessly; no halfway decent build order, no scouting.
TL;DR: If you'd like to try multiplayer vs. humans, learn the controls and give it a try, it's really not bad! But if you want a good single-player RTS from the olden days … maybe try Plants vs. Zombies? Overcooked? Definitely not Dune 2.
Oh, and about UnDUNE II: that one really has poor ergonomics, judging from the 5 minutes I played it. It's an incredibly cool piece of art, but what it does particularly well is emulating the original game within the constraints of Pico-8. As opposed to imagining what Dune 2 would have been like in a world where Pico-8 were state of the art. It's like playing Doom on a digital pregnancy test: It's extremely cool that I could do it if I wanted to; but I really, really don't want to.
Simple example: you can never have the following contiguous string:
WORDSAMPLE
Because the solution could legitimately be WORDS+AMPLE or WORD+SAMPLE.
A brute force of all possible contiguous regions, to hunt for rogue alternative solutions, is probably feasible in this small grid, but is there a better way?
This kind of situation actually does occur, and you can then use the knowledge that the solution is unique to conclude that neither alternative (WORDS+AMPLE or WORD+SAMPLE) can be part of the correct solution.