'Agents' (i.e. workflows intermingling code and calls to LLMs) are still a thing (as shown by the fact there is a post by anthropic on this subject on the front page right now) and they are very hard to build.
Consequence of that for instance: it's not possible to have a LLM explore exhaustively a topic.
I’d say, humans are also bound to promoting sessions in that way.
Apple has given me a simple way to manage many of my subscriptions, a single pane of glass, which I appreciate. I'm fine paying a little extra for that.
It would be more valuable to me if Apple didn't charge too much, which turns away service providers.
(1) chrome has a better security record than Safari so they are not protecting users by disallowing it. in fact they're doing the opposite. Preventing users from using more secure broswers
(2) the privacy protections are already circumvented in current WebView based browsers. How do you think Firefox iOS is able to sync all your history?
Arguably they're doing it to prevent any erosion of their native app market. other browsers provide more features like full screen support and PWA support, both of which are ways of providing app experiences that don't go throu apple's cash cow $$$$$ store
> The Mac, before it was cool.
That caption (of an image of the original Macintosh) also made me wonder. I wasn't born, but I had the impression that there was a lot of hype around the Mac, with the iconic Superbowl ad and everything?
> While the UC-2000 apparently played video games, we can’t imagine how it would have looked like with such a tiny and colorless display.
This was immediately followed by an image of Tetris being played on the watch. No need to imagine, haha.
First time encountering the phrase.
Evolution went from Machine Code to Assembly to Low-level programming languages to High-level programming languages (with frameworks), to... plain English.