Colonial powers are not entitled to that argument, it's hypocritical.
Oh f*ck off, if that's the stance then we should just recolonise those countries and send these doctors and engineers back to help rebuild them.
Deleted Comment
Deleted Comment
How about instead of attacking credentials we attack the arguments, you know, with evidence? Or, if your best defence is saying "your ideas/evidence come from unsavoury sources (to me)" maybe your positions are more reflective of your own biases than reality.
They usually follow the structure:
1. Solution
2. Context (problem space)
3. Alternatives + Details
4. Logic behind the decision for the solution (reiterating drawbacks)
5. Time/task breakdown (if applicable)
6. Closing remarks
7. Notes (usually only useful for technical audiences engaged in the implementation)