Readit News logoReadit News
mingw__ commented on Show HN: RomM – An open-source, self-hosted ROM manager and player   github.com/rommapp/romm... · Posted by u/gassi
mingw__ · 2 months ago
Seeing the integration with RetroAchievements is especially appreciated!
mingw__ commented on Forum reactions to Satoshi's Bitcoin paper   mail-archive.com/search?l... · Posted by u/highfrequency
mingw__ · 2 years ago
what a weird demand to make
mingw__ commented on Grug Brained Developer GPT   chat.openai.com/g/g-SkdKy... · Posted by u/domano
domano · 2 years ago
The emojis are strange, yeah. Well something for V2 then.

I guess the visitor can be good depending on your language and use case. We do a lot of graph traversal and make use of it.

mingw__ · 2 years ago
Visitor was more of a reference to: https://grugbrain.dev/#grug-on-visitor-pattern

I assumed the AI would outright tell me the pattern was not a good choice.

mingw__ commented on Grug Brained Developer GPT   chat.openai.com/g/g-SkdKy... · Posted by u/domano
mingw__ · 2 years ago
It's a good try. I noticed two things:

It likes to end responses like this: "Grug say, happy coding! [8 emojis]" It also told me the visitor pattern is a best practice.

mingw__ commented on We Need To Talk About Vercel   maxcountryman.com/article... · Posted by u/llambda
re-thc · 2 years ago
Too many bugs. Too many features rushed out the door. Every major AND minor version of NextJs has new features and/or breaking changes, which is fine on its own but existing stuff often also break.

We go through a cycle of: new feature -> patch fix -> minor fix -> improvement -> finally works -> replaced by something else OR it broke again.

For something like NextJs that has been running for years maybe more focus on polishing the existing features would be a good start.

mingw__ · 2 years ago
The Vercel way is to say "those aren't breaking changes, they're just bugs".

Deleted Comment

mingw__ commented on Luna Cryptocurrency Collapse: How UST Broke   cnet.com/personal-finance... · Posted by u/CharlesW
TacticalCoder · 3 years ago
Wait, I'm confused by the terminology now: is DAI an "algorithmic overcollateralized stable coin", or is DAI not algorithmic at all?
mingw__ · 3 years ago
No worries ... DeFi is a confusing space.

DAI is not algorithmic at all, but it is controlled by smart contracts. For $1.00 of DAI to be minted, a user has to post somewhere between $1.25-$1.50 of collateral. The act of creating DAI is literally that of taking out a loan. Over time, your debt to the system accrues interest. If your collateral falls under a certain price threshold, the issuer of DAI (MakerDAO), will seize your collateral to close your position. You keep the DAI, and MakerDAO liquidating you keeps the system above water and DAI at the dollar peg.

Algostables are not collateralized at all. They're more akin to ancient gold coins. Think of Luna as a small piece of gold. When UST is created, the Luna is "melted" to form the UST. At any point, the UST can then be "melted down" to get the Luna back out of it. From a certain point of view, UST literally is Luna.

mingw__ commented on Luna Cryptocurrency Collapse: How UST Broke   cnet.com/personal-finance... · Posted by u/CharlesW
IdEntities · 3 years ago
The one I've seen mentioned most often is DAI.
mingw__ · 3 years ago
DAI isn't an algostable. It's overcollateralized, so to mint $1.00 of DAI, you generally need $1.50 of crypto or centralized stablecoin.

u/mingw__

KarmaCake day72January 6, 2020View Original