Readit News logoReadit News
mindfulhack commented on Apple's apps bypass firewalls like LittleSnitch and LuLu on macOS Big Sur   twitter.com/patrickwardle... · Posted by u/robenkleene
jhasse · 5 years ago
Both of those things work under Linux for me. I guess it depends on the apps?
mindfulhack · 5 years ago
Can you give examples of which apps you noticed it working for? and what desktop environment/distro? I will most certainly test.
mindfulhack commented on Apple's apps bypass firewalls like LittleSnitch and LuLu on macOS Big Sur   twitter.com/patrickwardle... · Posted by u/robenkleene
dylan604 · 5 years ago
Thumbnails might work for a folder of images. However, QuickLook will also allow you to preview a video, Word Doc, PDF, spreadsheet, and text files including source code. It's honestly my favorite feature of the OS.

Trying to attach a file to an email, but not sure it's the right one? QuickLook allows you to view the document in the Open dialog. Once you use it, it is something you will just accept as natural and only notice it not being available on other OSes.

mindfulhack · 5 years ago
Linux Mint Cinnamon has this feature, with package `nemo-preview`. It even plays back actual video when spacebar'ing on an MKV file, something I can't do in macOS!
mindfulhack commented on Apple's apps bypass firewalls like LittleSnitch and LuLu on macOS Big Sur   twitter.com/patrickwardle... · Posted by u/robenkleene
dhaavi · 5 years ago
There is another - and I'd argue better - alternative for Linux and Windows:

Portmaster by Safing https://safing.io/portmaster/

Not only is it an application firewall, but also gives you DNS filtering (ie. Pi-Hole basics) and DNS-over-TLS.

Full Disclosure: I'm one of the founders.

mindfulhack · 5 years ago
But has it added pop-up per-app (and then per domain/port/ip) block/allow functionality in the Linux DE GUI yet? Thanks to your whole team for the awesome work.
mindfulhack commented on Apple's apps bypass firewalls like LittleSnitch and LuLu on macOS Big Sur   twitter.com/patrickwardle... · Posted by u/robenkleene
boogies · 5 years ago
> a lot of the features that MacOS has will never be implemented

Care to name any? Other times I’ve heard things like this on HN I’ve been able to locate them.

mindfulhack · 5 years ago
A big one I will sorely miss as I transition to Linux (and it's the only one I can think of right now), is the ability to rename and move around files while they are open!

OK here's another, very related: the ability to have apps remember their open files when you quit and re-open them.

These are significant productivity boosters, and I will miss them. It's definitely a trade-off, but now Apple has tipped the scales too much in favour of Linux...for me.

mindfulhack commented on AMD Is in Advanced Talks to Buy Xilinx   wsj.com/articles/amd-is-i... · Posted by u/dcgudeman
mindfulhack · 5 years ago
This makes me feel a lot better in light of NVIDIA' recent ARM acquisition. I really don't see Intel in my future. Linux needs AMD.
mindfulhack commented on Crouching T2, Hidden Danger   ironpeak.be/blog/crouchin... · Posted by u/xrayarx
selectodude · 5 years ago
Apple never sold you an unhackable laptop. It isn't cultural differences, it's simply that you weren't lied to and your hardware didn't stop being "fit for purpose".

From their ad copy -

"Every MacBook Pro is equipped with the Apple T2 Security Chip — our second‑generation custom Mac silicon designed to make everything you do even more secure. It includes a Secure Enclave coprocessor that powers Touch ID and provides the foundation for secure boot and encrypted storage capabilities. It also consolidates many discrete controllers, including the system management controller, audio controller, and SSD controller, into one."

mindfulhack · 5 years ago
Firstly, let's make it clear that we are now talking about broad concepts and not necessarily how it applies to the example of this situation at hand.

Under many jurisdictions' consumer laws, advertised features or promises by the manufacturer are not everything that they are legally held to. There is also statutory warranty, and other parts of consumer law, which can include rules on basic expectations of how that category of consumer item is expected to perform (I'm not talking CPU speeds, but major issues like a keyboard fundamentally not working at a reasonable success rate), how long it's reasonably expected to work without failing (for that category of item), and so on.

Very broad principles, but with some clear examples provided by consumer bodies to consumers, and it's reviewed on a case by case basis. You can bring it to the proverbial small claims court (or consumer complaint body), and they can review the claim.

I suppose I just won't bring up this matter to HN before. It's too alien to the US consumer situation and mustn't apply to most readers here.

mindfulhack commented on Crouching T2, Hidden Danger   ironpeak.be/blog/crouchin... · Posted by u/xrayarx
jiveturkey · 5 years ago
I feel for you, but your expectations are out of whack with reality. Any Windows laptop, properly maintained, is a reasonably secure device.

You can "restore" "reasonable" security to your Mac even in the almost unthinkable light of a possible actually available exploit, that can be reasonably be expected to affect you personally, by using a strong filevault password. Maybe you want to add a tripwire (file integrity) check at boot time, or a manual check when you mount any drive.

No, the precedent you ask for does not exist. In fact, the opposite is true.

mindfulhack · 5 years ago
Actually, in my country the consumer culture is extremely different to America. Consumers are not left high and dry if a manufacturer screws them over or was incompetent (such as design defects). Remedies are on sliding scales commensurate with the situation.

This is probably partially why I'm getting downvoted. Cultural differences. Americans are not aware of what's possible when things are actually fair for the consumer. They're used to 'tough luck' culture.

Upon further reading, I'm concluding this might not be a massive problem with other precautions in place, but the valid discussion point still remains. If a manufacturer designs a product which turns out to have a problem caused to the consumer which breaches reasonable expectations of its usability, and either needs repairing / recalling / replacing / refunding, many countries offer resource to the consumer. Under this principle, I wonder about unpatchable hardware security defects which cause a major problem...it needs to be explored more.

mindfulhack commented on Crouching T2, Hidden Danger   ironpeak.be/blog/crouchin... · Posted by u/xrayarx
mindfulhack · 5 years ago
This is infuriating. I spent over $5000 on a 16-inch MBP in only January this year.

If I'm a lawyer, CEO, or a human rights journalist (or just anyone) who professionally needs a reasonably secure device as the normal expectation, how can it be reasonable to be required to have your laptop with you at all times in order to maintain its security?

Is there precedent in consumer law that if security integrity of hardware is a normal feature of that product category and a computer model is fundamentally unfixable in this aspect, then you have the right to demand a refund or a replacement with a model not containing the same defect? (I know that this depends on your country. My country has strong consumer law.)

It's interesting to think about where the line is there. If someone really wants to compromise your device, then they could open it up and plant a bug anyway. But this feels over the line and grounds for being a manufacturer hardware fault, because attacking it would not require to physically modify the device but to merely use the device in the manner that it already came from the manufacturer.

mindfulhack commented on Cellmate: Male chastity gadget hack could lock users in   bbc.com/news/technology-5... · Posted by u/pbhowmic
kennywinker · 5 years ago
THIS!

The headline is about them getting locked on, because that's funny, but the buried lead is actually this:

> The security researchers said they discovered a way to fool the server into disclosing the registered name of each device owner, among other personal details, as well as the co-ordinates of every location from where the app had been used.

That's some really sensitive info, with the potential to destroy some lives, or be used as blackmail material.

mindfulhack · 5 years ago
I wish society were more sex-positive, stopped considering matters of sexuality or sexual activity to be so controversial, and stopped responding to them with such moral outrage to the point that your personal sexual activity could be considered something blackmail-worthy!

(I think this is a bigger problem in America than Europe.)

In either case, indeed, we need privacy (because other countries have terrible persecution around matters of mere sexuality) and as much maturity as we can muster when discussing it. I'm so proud of how mature this comment section is. Not a single giggling sexual joke in sight - at least here up at the top. Other sites would be riddled with it, with nothing serious discussed.

mindfulhack commented on How the Police Use AI to Track and Identify You   thegradient.pub/how-the-p... · Posted by u/kungfudoi
tal8d · 5 years ago
Well yeah, that is the solution that was arrived upon hundreds of years ago, and has been the norm ever since. Like Churchill said, democracy is the worst form of government - except for all the others. Declaring cops to be inherently powermad junkies is not an expression of accountability, it is a flawed value judgement that can only serve to justify very bad policy decisions (defund the police!).
mindfulhack · 5 years ago
I think it's an insightful observation. All humans are subject to being corrupted in by power. It's explained by our biology. Until our biology is no longer a meaningful problem, we need systems that hold those in power accountable. No one should be above the law. We need true equality.

u/mindfulhack

KarmaCake day1018August 5, 2017View Original