Readit News logoReadit News
mh- commented on Researchers find evidence of ChatGPT buzzwords turning up in everyday speech   news.fsu.edu/news/educati... · Posted by u/giuliomagnifico
jjani · 3 days ago
> Whenever there are commonly agreed upon and known tell-tale signs of AI writing

It's been two years now since such commonly agreed upon signs appeared yet by and large they're still just as present to this day.

mh- · 3 days ago
Survivor bias. You don't know what you're not spotting in the wild.
mh- commented on Researchers find evidence of ChatGPT buzzwords turning up in everyday speech   news.fsu.edu/news/educati... · Posted by u/giuliomagnifico
what · 3 days ago
Reddit is anything but high quality.
mh- · 3 days ago
Old Reddit was.
mh- commented on Gemini 2.5 Flash Image   developers.googleblog.com... · Posted by u/meetpateltech
asadm · 4 days ago
this is amazing. I just wish models would have more non-textual controls. I don't want to TYPE my instructions. We need a better UI for editing images with AI.
mh- · 4 days ago
Can you expand on that? What would ideal look like to you?
mh- commented on The air is hissing out of the overinflated AI balloon   theregister.com/2025/08/2... · Posted by u/rntn
jfengel · 4 days ago
The efficiencies in air travel don't come from the airplanes. They come from optimizing routes, eliminating competition, and cramming far more people on an airplane.

That saves a lot of money, and despite complaining people seem to accept the tradeoff of cheaper flights for an unpleasant experience. That comes from using basically the same technology as a half-century ago, with more customers.

mh- · 4 days ago
This is just factually incorrect. Yes, business efficiencies have come from all sorts of tactics, but this being HN: the engine on the 737 MAX uses >30% less fuel at cruise than the JT8D from the 1970s-era 737s.

Not to mention airframe improvements in both aerodynamics and materials.

mh- commented on The air is hissing out of the overinflated AI balloon   theregister.com/2025/08/2... · Posted by u/rntn
belZaah · 5 days ago
But it has. Aircraft have long stopped getting faster or bigger or having a longer range. They get marginally more efficient, but not better for consumers. Cars are mostly the same. Audio codecs. Everything has a balancing loop somewhere. With AI there are several, eg. the better it is, the more content is made using AI, the worse AI is
mh- · 5 days ago
In no particular order:

Air travel (thanks to efficiencies) costs a fraction of what it used to, look up what % of people have traveled by air and compare that to previous decades.

Cars are safer than ever, per mile driven, for their occupants and substantially more comfortable. They're also more efficient, but we've consciously traded that for heavier cars for crash safety.

Lossless audio codecs are ubiquitous, and there are low-loss low-latency wireless audio codecs deployed to billions of devices.

Agree with the AI statement, though.

mh- commented on Google will allow only apps from verified developers to be installed on Android   9to5google.com/2025/08/25... · Posted by u/kotaKat
layer8 · 5 days ago
This is confusing, since signing something already proves that you own the key.
mh- · 5 days ago
My assumption is they want to eliminate/prevent schemes where a ton of apps are signed as a service by a small number of centrally controlled keys.

Someone elsewhere in the thread said this is how F-Droid works, but I can't confirm firsthand.

mh- commented on Google will allow only apps from verified developers to be installed on Android   9to5google.com/2025/08/25... · Posted by u/kotaKat
thayne · 5 days ago
> The changes will affect all certified Android devices once live

I think that is a yes, it will affect Samsung

mh- · 5 days ago
Yeah, I think anything that has Google Play would fit that qualifier. So that's basically all major devices (in the West, at least). Oof.
mh- commented on The air is hissing out of the overinflated AI balloon   theregister.com/2025/08/2... · Posted by u/rntn
thegrim33 · 5 days ago
Something I've been doing a lot lately is investigating the people on HN that push various beliefs, and in this comment thread there's two voices pushing for how much AI is going to continue to grow, going forwards.

Who are these two voices? Well, we've got fragmede, who, looking through their HN profile, works at NVIDIA as a "senior AI infrastructure engineer", and we've got mh-, who, looking through their HN profile, works at Wunderkind, which is "pioneering a new category of AI agentic marketing".

So, the two people in here pushing messaging about how great and valuable AI is, and how it'll continue to get better, have their jobs/livelihood tied to AI and people continuing to pour money into AI.

It almost always turns out that way. The people protesting the loudest for some idea universally are somehow tied to profiting by convincing people of that idea. Not that that means they're wrong, of course. Just providing context.

mh- · 5 days ago
Thanks. It's worthwhile context that I perhaps should have disclosed, but I don't think it affects my opinions in this thread.

My opinion was simply in reaction to an, IMO, nonsensical claim:

> AI is now as good as it's going to get

And it would have been the same no matter what* technology we're discussing.

* Ok, someone commented NFTs. But I never considered that a technology.

(Since it's in the thread now: my opinions are mine, not my employer's.)

mh- commented on FCC bars providers for non-compliance with robocall protections   docs.fcc.gov/public/attac... · Posted by u/impish9208
jacobr1 · 5 days ago
How many are based in the US and subject to US-based prosecution?
mh- · 5 days ago
More than you'd think, from what I've seen.

u/mh-

KarmaCake day2524November 8, 2010
About
@michaelhood

[ my public key: https://keybase.io/mh; my proof: https://keybase.io/mh/sigs/Tyd7C9EJoNBqCiwnhIP_syW4U7CrE-BvkpuJYdAlnmk ]

View Original