Dead Comment
Two popular HN pieces have recently touched on how journalists and newspapers give twitter too much weight:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23833267
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23827073
All I'm seeing in this article is a few people trying to get that dopamine rush of engagement by dunking on "landlords" (not that all AirBnB hosts are landlords, some are just folks renting an extra room out), and sfgate happily obliging them.
That's a landlord.
Dead Comment
- Ryzen 3, 5, 7 which was fine
- Ryzen Threadripper because for some reason we couldn't just call it Ryzen with a bigger number (maybe they anticipated needing the 9 later)
- Epyc for servers that supports ECC memory
- Now we have Ryzen 9 because Intel made Core i9 (I guess this makes sense for people comparison shopping)
- Now we also have Threadripper Pro just because we can, not even as a response to Intel
Epyc is the only distinction that needs to be made IMHO. The rest should just be Ryzen 3,5,7,9,11,13... for desktop parts. It's fine if Ryzen 11 and 13 had different sockets (like TR does). I don't need TR and I don't need TR Pro to denote product lines alongside the numbering scheme.
I know this is a minor issue, but it shouldn't be that hard. Yeah, yeah, "there are only two hard problems in computer science..." But look at the crap that consumers have to deal with around USB naming and WiFi naming. Don't make CPU naming follow the same trend.
I legitimately do not understand writing your post directly addressing AMD as if they're actually listening to you.
Dead Comment
"Once the shoeshine boy and the taxi driver offer stock tips, it’s time to sell."
I cannot fathom how this logic even works.
https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
all 0 requests to stop, just constant downvotes for telling people, rightfully, how much boot they're guzzling