The board of OpenAI is supposedly going to "determine the fate of the world", robotics to be "completely solved" by 2020, the goal of OpenAI is to "avoid an AGI dictatorship".
Is nobody in these very rich guys' spheres pushing back on their thought process? So far we are multiple years in with much investment and little return, and no obvious large-scale product-market fit, much less a superintelligence.
As a bonus, they lay out the OpenAI business model:
> Our fundraising conversations show that:
> * Ilya and I are able to convince reputable people that AGI can really happen in the next ≤10 years
> * There’s appetite for donations from those people
> * There’s very large appetite for investments from those people
I'm always blown away when I see comments like this.
It just makes me think the people that say this either work for a competitor or simply haven't used their products.
The things that OpenAI and similar companies have created are literally revolutionary. It's insane. Pretending it's "little return" is a very strange opinion.
I'll admit the design has grown on me, and we need more mainstream vehicles challenging the boring design "norms".
I would love to see a cross between the Model Y and Cybertruck in the future.
I'd argue that we need to start treating cars like the utilitarian objects they are and stop associating our personalities with them.
Deleted Comment
Articles like this make me sad.
But I think there were sheep, dancing babies (ugh!!), something like Bonzi Buddy rings a bell (I once had to clean something named that off a colleague’s workstation when he reported it thinking it was malware).
There was also toys like this on Linux and Unix too. Most famously xeyes.
I miss the playful era when things like this and novelty screensavers were “cool”.
backs away slowly
100% wrong. LLMs are wildly useful in daily life, even the cheaper models.
Amazon has been working with Anthropic which at the very least will create a much more comprehensive Alexa.
> expensive talking fidget spinners
Like Alexa, Siri, and Hey Google? Which are used A LOT and will only be used more when they're natural, smarter, and conversational?
Always a strange take.