> Apple charges apps a Core Technology Fee (CTF) for each install after their first one million installs, but the fees don't kick in right away for small developers.
Still ridiculous apple got away with this one. The entire point is to free users and developers from Apple's tyranny.
Big statement, maybe for you but for plenty people it seems to be interesting enough without those.
It's a shame the article mostly teaches about codegolf tricks, and the actual wasm info is left to a single commented code block.
Nonetheless an interesting article about JavaScript quirks though!
Sure it’s slower, but you’ll spend most of the time sleeping and it saves you one night at a hotel.
They're incredible.
[0]: https://www.seat61.com/trains-and-routes/nightjet-new-genera...
Our approach would be to add some filters into our 'restore' pipeline which drops the problematic data should we ever attempt a restore, but I don't think it's good enough, and we have to maintain a list of user id hashes or such to power the filters.
Edit: I mean, in a way that won't eat a lot of costs. I can imagine a malicious group opening and demanding deletions for 1000s of users which would mean a deletion job running on a large number of these 20TB backups, say 100 daily backups and for multiple users?
You may even be okay to just reply to the user that you've deleted all active copies of the data and it'll be fully gone when your backups expire in 30 days.
IANAL tho.
Because there is a ton of investments that aren't liquid, aren't trivial to value on an ongoing basis, and aren't infinitely divisible.
Again, a farm is a perfect example. Land prices are going up. Your family farm was worth n million, and is now theoretically worth twice that. Do you sell a portion of it to developers to pay the tax on the unrealized gains? Oh by the way, the land is probably zoned agricultural, so you actually can't.
Or, you buy a famous painting as an investment. Do you cut off a piece each year and auction it off?
Yeah, it's relatively easy for stock market holdings. But if stocks get unfavorable tax treatment, all this will accomplish is moving money away from the stock market toward assets that get a better treatment... like investment real estate, with all the problems that entails.
Accurately valuing the painting every year is definitely very difficult.
The same argument doesn't necessarily go for a farmer's farmland. The zoning could of course be calculated into the land value. But I'm unsure if farming economics allow for paying the taxes on those unrealized gains
It's an odd name. Nice of you to share on Github.