Which is why my position is GPL > MIT..
GPL makes them share or pay to relicense, since you own the copyright. with MIT, they don’t need to ask. MIT just benefits big corps. GPL better protects the open-source spirit, and paradoxically, the ownership of your work.
of course, he’s a very, very proficient developer and a browser specialist. he’s not just vibecoding, like you might be implying. but he also uses llms for development.
and btw, i get the impression norway is spending their money pretty wisely, thinking long-term. and thinking with their own brain. not like the UAE, where they started thinking about the future too late, and mostly with brains hired from the west like McKinsey (who are just siphoning the wealth away into their pocket: see neom, etc).
Even admitting one wants to go with bare bone web components authoring and maintaining them is expensive, requires lit or something.
Thus, what's the solution? Some sort of templating? Again, you're bringing on dependencies.
honestly ctrl+c, ctrl+v of hand written html. and i'm cool as a cucumber.
Google have also asked for it to be removed from the standard [0].
[0] https://github.com/WHATWG/html/issues/11523