Readit News- Stable Diffusion at Heidelberg University
- Biontech/Pfizer covid vaccine in Mainz
- What else?
There's probably more linux users in China than the US, perhaps even more than US+EU.
This is, and always has been, the primary UX problem with git. You use commands to manipulate the program’s model of the data, rather than to demonstrate your intent. It works only as long as your mental model of git matches git itself, but it doesn’t easily afford abstraction, and abstraction is the essence of efficient manipulation.
Put another way, a good tool allows you to use it well even if you don’t understand how it works. Git OTOH will quickly punish you for not understanding its model of the world.
A good UX for git would maintain the complexity for experts and provide a clear and simple surface area for most people who just want to perform familiar tasks. The fact that each person and team seems to have a unique incantation just for everyday tasks is an awful smell, and a sign of git’s immaturity.
Much later in my career I learnt that people were using git without even knowing anything about what a Merkle tree is and I must say I was extremely surprised. I'm not saying its good or bad, just describing my younger days.
The point of the article us that it may, or may not, be you.
I notice that you weren't clear on this part in your post, suggesting perhaps that it's not something that's front-of-mind like the CLA is.
On the CLA front I'm on the fence. Assign, don't assign, that's for each person to decide.
But the alternative to CLA is not necessarily "I keep the copyright". That's the point the article is asking you to consider.
Aside; unless you have a specific bit of paper assigning copyright to you, and assuming you have a day job, it's very unlikely that you hold the copyright even if you only do OSS work at home on weekends.
And lastly - have you ever enforced your copyright legally? If you have never enforced a copyright violation then your work is effectively public domain. Yes the threat that you could take action exists, but in practice your contributed-to-project can change their license and call your bluff.
CLAs can have a legitimate purpose in clarifying copyright ownerships.
> The new policy signifies a key change in Xiaomi’s way of handling things and now raises several questions over how developers, enthusiasts, and other users will be affected.
I don't know any human who speaks or writes like that.
> Although not explained by Xiaomi officially, the following could be some of the reasons for this update.
Likely LLM, but will give it a pass
> Allowing a limited number of devices that one can unlock reduces for Xiaomi the possibility of misuse of an unlocked device by performing some unauthorized or potentially harmful activity.
Exactly how ChatGPT would "enhance" your writing.
> The new limit will indeed be a big problem, especially for those working with several devices for testing and development purposes.
"a big problem" sounds too unprofessional for ChatGPT, and this part likely was revised by a human writer.
> To the Community of Custom ROMs: This move will delay the development of third-party ROMs, kernels, and mods for Xiaomi devices.
A confusing claim without any context/explanation/evidence? That's LLM.
I really wanted to read that book as a young man to understand why it was so toxic. But I didn’t want anyone to ever see me reading it. I went as far as making a plan to glue another book cover over it. Problem was I also didn’t want the Rand estate to profit from my curiosity.
In the meantime, India didn't self-implode, at least not yet.