Readit News logoReadit News
madisfun commented on I Add 3-25 Seconds of Latency to Every Site I Visit   howonlee.github.io/2020/0... · Posted by u/curuinor
karatestomp · 6 years ago
Packages show up on the lawn it is astonishing how they appear.

They are astonishing surprises.

It’s what I ordered the cat food the espresso machine the two new tables.

Ordering things and how they appear basically I am a small-scale sorcerer.

On the road I press the button and the music goes.

Air conditioning gas pedal restaurant take-out etc.

It is my will being perpetually sated.

Pretend we are writing a fable in which a sorcerer always gets what he wants.

Consider what happens to a soul which always gets what it wants.

— Emily Bludworth de Barios, from the preview page for issue #31 of Forklift, Ohio (and, indeed, the issue itself, if you have it):

http://www.forkliftohio.com/index.php?page=freight-31

madisfun · 6 years ago
> Consider what happens to a soul which always gets what it wants.

The soul craves for what's not easily attainable.

Commercial transactions are all the same.

Feasibility is sweet but one-dimensional.

There're things you can buy, and things you cannot.

You cannot buy a different self.

Politics, volunteering, social games, arts and sports

are the new frontier.

And we act to define what we are.

madisfun commented on 23andMe lays off 100 people as DNA test sales decline   cnbc.com/2020/01/23/23and... · Posted by u/coloneltcb
skissane · 6 years ago
> Maybe the industry as a whole should stop handing stuff over to law enforcement and governments.

They can try saying "No", then the government will just get a court order to force them to do it. They don't really have a choice in the end – the only choice they have is whether they make it easy for the government ("you want our data? here have it!") or slightly harder ("I'll need to see a warrant first..." "No problem, we are going to the magistrate right now to get one...")

madisfun · 6 years ago
The companies like 23andMe can do anonymous tests. They can even sell "gift cards" for cash (or bitcoin, for digitally inclined). Don't deliver kits, let them be picked up without asking for an ID, just by the gift card number. As long as the test results are not linked to a specific address or name, it's fine.

They will still have clues about the state and the city and the IP address of the person. It's enough to do whatever research they may want to do with aggregate data. It's not good enough to sell this data to insurance companies and advertisers.

madisfun commented on iOS 13 app tracking alert has dramatically cut location data flow to ad industry   appleinsider.com/articles... · Posted by u/clairity
benbristow · 6 years ago
Lightning cables are more popular than USB-C cables at this point. If I'm at a party or something usually someone has an iPhone cable, USB-C, not so much.

To be honest with an iPhone there's not much reason to want to sideload anything. Sideloading on Android is dodgy enough with dodgy APKs. Who knows what they're doing in the background? At least with the App Store (and Play Store for that matter) being a walled garden, for both it's positives and negatives, you know an app has been vetted and is safe from malware.

madisfun · 6 years ago
> Sideloading on Android is dodgy enough with dodgy APKs.

Sideloading is what allows to use third party app stores like F-Droid and to run apps Google banned like Blokada (system-wide ad-blocker).

madisfun commented on Netflix sends journalists on pricey trips   washingtonpost.com/busine... · Posted by u/danso
madisfun · 6 years ago
I saw a link "Netflix sends journalists on pricey trips". "Support great journalism," said the link I followed.

(paywall)

madisfun commented on How Facebook Avoids Ad Blockers   dylanpaulus.com/2019-11-2... · Posted by u/ganderzz
goatinaboat · 6 years ago
Because GDPR states that consent can be withdrawn at any time, and that provision of services can not be tied to consent. That’s the law here in Wales.
madisfun · 6 years ago
GDPR requires consent for the processing of the personal data. Displaying an ad per se is not regulated by GDPR, and does not require consent. Though personalization of this advertisement requires processing of the PII, and thus it is supposed to be regulated.

Facebook UI is full of dark patterns, but it is possible to withdraw consent through settings: www.facebook.com/ads/preferences/

madisfun commented on uBlock Origin: Address first-party tracker blocking   github.com/uBlockOrigin/u... · Posted by u/hokkos
thenewnewguy · 6 years ago
> looking at you, Microsoft teams

Teams definitely doesn't block Firefox for me?

madisfun · 6 years ago
Teams on Firefox enters in a loop of infinite logins.
madisfun commented on Former Twitter Employees Charged with Spying for Saudi Arabia   washingtonpost.com/nation... · Posted by u/grzm
celticninja · 6 years ago
I wonder if GitLab will add Saudi Arabia to their employee region block?
madisfun · 6 years ago
Saudi Arabia is a US ally, so family region block against them is unlikely. Even if it is a country that tolerates and promotes open slave trade (look up #maidsfortransfer on BBC).
madisfun commented on Adobe deactivates all Venezuelan accounts   helpx.adobe.com/la/x-prod... · Posted by u/sndpsy
madisfun · 6 years ago
What it shows is that it's risky to rely on a "cloud"/subscription service offered by a company from a different jurisdiction. In particular, if the service provider is a US company, it's a red flag. If it's Chinese, it's a red flag too.
madisfun commented on Adblock Radio: An adblocker for live radio streams and podcasts   github.com/adblockradio/a... · Posted by u/albertzeyer
mkolodny · 6 years ago
I agree that it's perfectly fine to block ads. And that ad blockers' primary feature is blocking ads.

At the same time, I think most ads aren't malicious. They aren't "intending to do harm". Ads sell things. Sometimes things people want. I'd guess that most people who use ad blockers just don't like being sold things.

madisfun · 6 years ago
Sometimes. It's not a good defence of a thing, if it is good only sometimes and only for some people. By implication it's not good for the others.
madisfun commented on A guide to set up your own round-robin DNS-over-HTTPS proxy for privacy   dohproxy.com/... · Posted by u/jkingsman
madisfun · 6 years ago
Round-robin and privacy do not dwell well together. Like mike-cardwell pointed out in another comment, it just distributes the same information to more parties.

As there has to be at least party which will know the request, some information will be leaked. But what can be prevented, is giving "unrelated" requests in the hands of the same resolver. Few of the request per se are interesting, the combinations of them allow to build user profiles.

The policy should not be round robin, but somehow based on the domain itself, so that all requests about the same domain go to the same resolver, but to nobody else.

An even better mechanism would take into account who is the owner and the controller of the domain. So that requests about, let say, facebook.com and fbsbx.com land at the same resolver, but github.com and microsoft.com by another.

u/madisfun

KarmaCake day90January 26, 2017View Original