Readit News logoReadit News
lq9AJ8yrfs commented on Australia withdraws fines amid 3D printed plate surge   3dprint.com/319960/outlaw... · Posted by u/lq9AJ8yrfs
__d · 10 days ago
Perhaps you don’t need to _prove_ it, just introduce reasonable doubt?

If you can use ANPR evidence to show a plate being in two places at once, that should be sufficient. A parking garage might have plate records too. Even something like roof racks or stickers on a vehicle might be enough to distinguish it.

lq9AJ8yrfs · 10 days ago
I could see that.

I guess if you were a municipality you might respond by increasing the frequency and coverage of ANPR and imtegrate alike systems, like you suggest garage records and location tracking, to compensate. TPMS has been used in traffic flow management, and a lot of places have transponders for tolling or private access.

Increasing surveillance might be controversial but maybe less so in .au?

License plates do seem anachronistic, ANPR notwithstanding.

Depending on the sophistication of the operation it opens up some interesting angles - if you can pay a gig worker to wait in line or chauffeur you, seems like it wouldn't be much more to pay someone to put on a plate and drive around safely. A /get out of tickets/ service.

lq9AJ8yrfs commented on Australia withdraws fines amid 3D printed plate surge   3dprint.com/319960/outlaw... · Posted by u/lq9AJ8yrfs
lq9AJ8yrfs · 10 days ago
There is some novelty, to me at least, in matching the plate to a similar make / model. a 3d printer isn't ostensibly needed to make a fake plate but perhaps makes an "attractive nuisance", or perhaps is just more widely available skill among the criminally inclined than traditional manufacturing techniques.

From the article it's not clear entirely how you'd set about to clear your name / title if you were on the receiving end of a fine issued on the basis of a fake plate. Similarly not clear whether drivers could claim fake plates to get out of legit traffic citations.

Deleted Comment

lq9AJ8yrfs commented on How Scientific Empires End   theatlantic.com/science/a... · Posted by u/mooreds
thatnerd · 25 days ago
The comparison to the present-day US isn't hyperbole. It's not a perfect match but there are parallels.

The article mentions Lysenko, a Soviet "biologist" who set back Soviet biology for a generation. He believed, for example, that plants in the USSR would not compete with each other for resources the way they did in capitalist societies, but would instead share resources. He asserted that crops could therefore be planted closer together in the USSR, yielding more food per acre. Evidence to the contrary was suppressed: Lysenko had Stalin's ear and a zealot's confidence. The rest of the field was either purged or fell in line. Scientists lost their jobs or got sent to Siberia.

The comparison to the present-day US isn't perfect, but it also isn't hyperbole. While scientists in the US mostly aren't in the same type of danger of arrest for speaking out (assuming ICE doesn't start targeting political opponents), but we're looking at a similar era in the US in terms of making theories and data fit ideology. RFK, Jr. has his preferred biological theories about vaccines, autism, and disease. Government scientists are at risk of losing their jobs and their financial security if they reference (or publish) findings that Kennedy objects to. Universities are still (as far as I can tell) safe for natural scientists because the first wave of the crackdown is focused on the humanities and social sciences, so this purge of scientists is limited to federal government employees, but the effect is real, and it isn't a stretch to assume that if the government finds success in the current purge, it will go looking further afield.

The human impact is significant for those affected, but the article is right to point out that this purge of scientists from the government for ideological goals will have a broader impact for society: it will set back American science.

Kennedy doesn't even have to be wrong on the facts for the culture he's creating to be toxic for federal science in his department and beyond. Just the politicization of science pushes our country towards being a scientific backwater.

lq9AJ8yrfs · 25 days ago
Neither US political party has a monopoly on Lysenko-style academics, unfortunately.

At least one of them seems to have an introspective capacity, at some level. So that's nice?

Genuinely I wonder if this would make for good charity? Where can I donate to promote political introspection? I'll consider any mainstream spot on the political spectrum.

lq9AJ8yrfs commented on Tuning the Prusa Core One   arachnoid.com/3D_Printing... · Posted by u/lutusp
conorbergin · 2 months ago
I could not imagine trying to design a 3d part without fillets. I use Build123d mostly, and have even gone as far as using the Open Cascade library directly, but if I had to choose between FreeCAD or OpenSCAD/Solvespace I would rather work around FreeCADs jank than give up fillets.
lq9AJ8yrfs · 2 months ago
Have you tried BOSL2? [1] Adds a lot to openscad, enough to keep me going at least. Fillets, chamfers, rounding, common parts, anchoring options, and it makes use of parent-child relationships between parts.

Not entirely perfect and some compromises, for example faceting isn't always consistent and hashtag highlighting doesn't seem quite right, but overall still it's good enough for me. The wiki on GitHub is pretty good, and with the source in hand I have had an easy time understanding what it does and tweaking it as needed.

For openscad itself, there are nightly builds with the new geometry engine, which too mostly works for me and is a huge speedup over the older CGAL engine. Renders that took minutes in CGAL now take seconds with the new engine. I like to take faceting through the roof for nicely rounded curves, but that kills CGAL apparently.

[1] https://github.com/BelfrySCAD/BOSL2

lq9AJ8yrfs commented on The first non-opoid painkiller   worksinprogress.news/p/th... · Posted by u/ortegaygasset
ocrow · 2 months ago
The drawback of Ibuprofen is that it tends to cause damage to stomach and intestinal linings. That's why you are advised to take with food and/or lots of water. You don't want it absorbing all in one place. Long term use exacerbates the effect, making it more likely to cause ulcers and eventually internal bleeding. My partner ended up in the hospital with a serious internal bleed caused by taking Ibuprofen daily for chronic pain. I'm not saying don't use it, just be aware of the risks.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9715832/

lq9AJ8yrfs · 2 months ago
Ibuprofen is possibly worse than that, it seems that it may interfere with sex hormones. [1]

This 2017 study I found in 30s of searching is seemingly underpowered at n=30 or so, but the (preliminary) implication is awful enough that I won't give my boys ibuprofen at all. Out of abundance of caution.

They can have naproxen or acetaminophen instead -- we keep those out of reach and teach our children not to touch them without adults.

Perhaps there is some more recent research?

[1] https://www.pnas.org/doi/abs/10.1073/pnas.1715035115

lq9AJ8yrfs commented on Bot or human? Creating an invisible Turing test for the internet   research.roundtable.ai/pr... · Posted by u/timshell
lugu · 2 months ago
It is late and I am thinking out load. How about a reputation system where users bring proof that other websites haven't found them abusive.

Visit a website that require identification. Generate a random unique identifier in your user agent. Live your life on that site. Download from that site a certificate that prove that your didn't abuse their site. Repeat that a few times.

Visit the site that wants to know if you are an abusive user. Share your certificates. They get to choose if they accept you.

If you abuse that site, it reports the abuse to the other sites that delivered you a certificate. Those sites gets to decide if they revoke their certificate or not.

It is a self policying system that require some level of cooperation. Users make themselves vulnerable to the risk of having sites they like loose trust in them.

lq9AJ8yrfs · 2 months ago
> It is a self policying system that require some level of cooperation.

How hard is it to obtain one of these certificates as a bot?

What you are describing though is possibly comparable to Privacypass.

Apple seems to be on board with Privacypass, perhaps they'll include a digital voucher of some kind with their devices and that presumably contributes to old devices getting worse as the voucher is spent down.

Just imagine if the whole web can contribute to planned obsolescence and you can pay for a fast, hassle free internet experience again just by buying a new phone.

And then you can dump the old ones on eBay for cheap as long as you don't plan on using them to access online services. Unless you are willing to settle for basic economy web experience.

lq9AJ8yrfs commented on Getting ready to issue IP address certificates   community.letsencrypt.org... · Posted by u/Bogdanp
lq9AJ8yrfs · 2 months ago
So all the addressing bodies (e.g., ISPs and cloud providers) are on board then right? They sometimes cycle through IP's with great velocity. Faster than 6 days at least.

Lots of sport here, unless perhaps they cool off IPs before reallocating, or perhaps query and revoke any certs before reusing the IP?

If the addressing bodies are not on board then it's a user responsibility to validate the host header and reject unwanted IP address based connections until any legacy certs are gone / or revoke any legacy certs. Or just wait to use your shiny new IP?

I wonder how many IP certs you could get for how much money with the different cloud providers.

u/lq9AJ8yrfs

KarmaCake day252August 7, 2022
About
lq9AJ8yrfs@apipocalypse.com serious inquiries only. No bots, no sales, no marketing, no offers, no drama.

I am kind but I don't forgive easily.

View Original