Readit News logoReadit News
lpat commented on Claude Code Unleashed   ymichael.com/2025/07/15/c... · Posted by u/ymichael
brainless · 2 months ago
I have not thought about it, it is one of the things on my list. But my understanding was that developers copy code from Stack Overflow, as an example. It is not "my" code but I still am the author. Or lets say I ask my friend to add code and she/he simply passes over the code to me. I author it in my name.

The "barely" part may be important and I would like to know what others are doing.

lpat · 2 months ago
I don't think you can just willy-nilly copy code from StackOverflow and sign it with your name. It's license forbids it. You also can't just sign your friend's code with your name unless she explicitly gives you permission. In both cases you are not the author of that code.

I get that people do it anyway but I guess it's kind of a grey-area because it's hard to tell after the fact that some snippet has been copied from SO.

lpat commented on Building a Game with the Real Engine   novalis.org/blog/2024-10-... · Posted by u/luu
Vampiero · 10 months ago
Every single game dev on Earth has been thinking that since the very first GANs, but the state of the art when it comes to generative AIs that are actually useful for asset generation is still pretty bad.

Much like LLMs are still pretty bad at logic. It seems like we're plateauing in that regard...

The thing about assets is that they have to be coherent with each other. You can't just generate them one at a time in a bunch of different styles and sizes or they'll look terrible. In the simplest case you want to generate at least an entire spritesheet for a single character or object. And that's still fundamentally impossible with modern generative AIs

lpat · 10 months ago
Consistency was for sure the biggest issue when I tried this approach last time. Also most of the images were a bit off, like having misaligned limb or some visual glitch. Sometimes fixing those details can be harder than drawing some crappy image from scratch.

I really wish there was a tool where I can select the theme, which objects I need and it would spit out some half decently looking art. I even don't care if it was some simplified, cookie-cutter art as long as it was low-effort and consistent. It could be a real time saver for prototyping.

lpat commented on Why birds do not fall while sleeping   news.cnrs.fr/articles/why... · Posted by u/mdp2021
nkrisc · a year ago
> How do you know that our trachea is not an optimal design when you take into account all the tradeoffs?

Because if we were designed from scratch we could have been designed in any optimal shape or form.

> You're surrounded by items created by intelligent design (us) and all of them have flaws, reused parts and tend to break. Obviously you wouldn't argue based on this that they weren't designed by intelligent beings.

Show me an intelligent designer who can literally design the universe, but is still not intelligent enough to avoid these flaws even we can recognize. I don’t think we are intelligent enough to design a completely novel life form, let alone as many as exist on earth in all their forms.

This is all beside the point that there’s no evidence of any kind for intelligent design, only supposition based on nothing more than intuition and feelings.

lpat · a year ago
> Because if we were designed from scratch we could have been designed in any optimal shape or form

Only if you assume the designer had infinite time, knowledge and resources. But life on Earth did not have to be created by some omnipotent god who created universe. It only requires more advanced intelligence than us. Although theoretically even we may reach this level in the future with advances in bioengineering.

> This is all beside the point that there’s no evidence of any kind for intelligent design, only supposition based on nothing more than intuition and feelings.

Depending on what you consider "evidence" the same sentence could be said for evolution. There are many arguments in favor of intelligent design like for example no viable mechanism of randomly evolving genetic code. I wouldn't say it's as open and shut case as you make it seem.

lpat commented on Why birds do not fall while sleeping   news.cnrs.fr/articles/why... · Posted by u/mdp2021
nkrisc · a year ago
The fascination with “intelligent design” is cherry-picking. The is no shortage of “unintelligent design” in the natural world.

Take humans, for example. You can block your trachea and die through the simple act of eating. An intelligent (and omniscient) designer could have avoided that by better designing our overall our overall structure.

Or take the fact or ear bones are modified jaw bones. Or if you believe in intelligent design, ask why our intelligent designer thought it wise to link our jaw to our ears so that it’s hard to hear things when you’re chewing.

lpat · a year ago
That's pretty weak argument against intelligent design.

1. The designer does not have to be "omniscient" only intelligent. Some people believe in it's omniscience but I don't think it's a requirement.

2. How do you know that our trachea is not an optimal design when you take into account all the tradeoffs?

3. You're surrounded by items created by intelligent design (us) and all of them have flaws, reused parts and tend to break. Obviously you wouldn't argue based on this that they weren't designed by intelligent beings.

lpat commented on Facebook is now claiming official CDC.gov links are “False Information”   i.postimg.cc/CLBCNx0Q/D4H... · Posted by u/URfejk
nafix · 4 years ago
Are you sure about that? Can you explain to me what the wording from the CDC announcement means?
lpat · 4 years ago
If I understand correctly it means that the old tests tested only for covid and the new ones test for covid and influenza at the same time. This makes them more efficient because you won't have to test twice to detect each virus separately.
lpat commented on Haskell for Beginners   blog.kalvad.com/haskell-s... · Posted by u/wowi42
hardwaresofton · 4 years ago
LYAH is a great resource but it is a bit dated at this point and there have been more entries into the space.

Haskell needs more content like this to show people how approachable it is, and especially when they're more up to date and more in line with recent best practices in using haskell.

As long as we're not all doing burrito tutorials, the more people that engage with Haskell (and write posts about it), especially simple, straight to the point ones like this the better.

I personally have written a guide on how to build practical APIs in Haskell that is now quite outdated[0], and while I tried to go from zero, it is almost certainly not a good entry guide. Glad to see more people taking stabs at it.

[0]: https://vadosware.io/post/rest-ish-services-in-haskell-part-...

lpat · 4 years ago
So is it still worth reading LYAH nowadays? Are there any other resources that you could recommend instead of it?

u/lpat

KarmaCake day10February 18, 2019View Original