Readit News logoReadit News
lokar commented on Ford kills the All-Electric F-150   wired.com/story/ford-kill... · Posted by u/sacred-rat
mckn1ght · 12 hours ago
Alaska checking in. Nobody is hauling a skidoo around here in a van. You also won’t see anyone towing a trailer with one or two machines with anything other than a truck, because nothing else is going to hack it in the mountains with all that. I currently just drive mine up a ramp into the truck bed, I can quickly park and get off and go and back on again. Very versatile combo to get around with.

Right tool for the job. I drive an AWD Prius with winter tires to get groceries in the snow.

lokar · 9 hours ago
When I lived in anchorage ages ago Subarus were really popular.

Everyone with a truck had to put a bunch of weight in the back to manage the roads in the winter.

lokar commented on Ford kills the All-Electric F-150   wired.com/story/ford-kill... · Posted by u/sacred-rat
mattmaroon · 11 hours ago
Define “need”. I only use my snow shovel like 3 days a year. Does that mean I don’t need a snow shovel? I only camp in my camper one month a year, but I can’t move that thing with anything other than a pickup. I don’t “need” my truck for that. I operate several food trailers. I can’t tow most of them even with my 2500 reefer van, but I could go back into software.

The better question might be how often does one utilize the unique shape and capability of a pickup.

Also, define heavy. Half ton and below, sure, those are just differently-shaped SUVs to most people who own them. 3/4 ton and up are work trucks. But every truck owner finds themselves moving things you can’t move in an SUV on occasion.

lokar · 9 hours ago
I was talking about the heave ones. Past a certain weight there is a special tax preference. For example, every Mercedes dealer (it seems) has an explanation on their website pitching their G series SUV. People buy they and claim they are primarily for business, but there is very little enforcement or verification.
lokar commented on Upcoming Changes to Let's Encrypt Certificates   community.letsencrypt.org... · Posted by u/schmuckonwheels
deepsun · a day ago
Well, how the vendor was going to apply other security updates if they cannot update their basic security trust store?

If the vendor is really unable to update, then it's at best negligence when designing the product, and at worst -- planned obsolescence.

lokar · 18 hours ago
Yeah, participation in web tls requires the ability to regularly update your server and client code.

Nothing stays the same forever, software is never done. It’s absurd pretend otherwise.

lokar commented on Ford kills the All-Electric F-150   wired.com/story/ford-kill... · Posted by u/sacred-rat
mattmaroon · 19 hours ago
Yeah I might have thought that too if I didn’t own commercial vehicles. I own a few and the idea of switching to an EV for them is laughable. Go tow stuff for 8 hours one day and ask yourself “if I had to stop for 30 minutes every 90 miles how would I like this day?”

Battery ranges decline by over 50% when towing. The long term health of a battery requires you to keep it within a range of about 60% of the max capacity (ie between 20 and 80). So that’s if anything a generous estimate. You’d increase your labor cost by 25% just charging, not to mention that public charging isn’t any cheaper than fuel. I’m not even factoring in lost job profits or overtime.

The margins the Ford dealer takes are not the issue. The cost of the vehicle itself amortized by the hour is much less than the labor cost of operating it. If I could get any EV truck at the same cost as my diesel, I still wouldn’t. If you’ve got two guys out, that’s $50 burnt every time they charge (at least) and that may be 2+ times a day. Your fuel cost is irrelevant. Five minutes at a gas station and a tank of diesel is still cheaper.

It has some use cases I’m sure (delivery vans since it is one worker, city driving, short range) but most commercial vehicle work is simply not going electric given current battery technology.

lokar · 18 hours ago
Most heavy trucks are sold to people who don’t really need them, but buy them to signal cultural allegiance and get a tax break.
lokar commented on Ford kills the All-Electric F-150   wired.com/story/ford-kill... · Posted by u/sacred-rat
dpark · 19 hours ago
It’s a real concern in the sense that a lot of them care about the capability.

Objectively a Ford F-150 is the wrong vehicle for what 90% of its buyers need. But it’s an aspirational purchase. It can go off-road. It can haul a boat. It can haul a bed full of gravel. It doesn’t matter for these purchasers that they rarely if ever actually do any of this.

lokar · 18 hours ago
For many it’s also a visible badge showing membership in a culture.
lokar commented on Secret Documents Show Pepsi and Walmart Colluded to Raise Food Prices   thebignewsletter.com/p/se... · Posted by u/connor11528
lanfeust6 · a day ago
> It's not the discounting that's a problem -- it's the intentionally watching other stores and preventing them from closing the "price gap" with Walmart

This is circular. You are just describing a selective/privileged discount, again.

Food Lion could of course sell some items at a loss (Walmart did this, to gain market share and beat out smaller businesses). Costco continues to sell hot dogs at a loss. But that probably wouldn't work for Pepsi products in this context; fortunately, there are other products beyond Pepsi.

lokar · 18 hours ago
The article explains that for a supermarket Pepsi is a must have product, they loose to many customers if they don’t have it.

Only one company sells it (obviously). Pepsi is enforcing a retail price differential between Walmart and other retailers.

This is a violation of US law

lokar commented on The future of Terraform CDK   github.com/hashicorp/terr... · Posted by u/mfornasa
here2learnstuff · 6 days ago
Please expand on your experiences, because I've had great luck with Pulumi at my company since October 2021. No engineer liked HCL, our demographic was engineers who were familiar with programming languages who wanted to self service basic infrastructure (AWS SecretsManager, IRSA roles, Databricks Service Principals, etc). We were pretty easily able to shim in a RunAtlantis inspired system that displayed previews that required explicit approval when a PR was raised, performed apply on merge to main, and ran drift checks periodically.
lokar · 6 days ago
For me, the ideal is each team owns its own config/lifecycle mgmt, and does it in the language they wrote the rest of the system in.
lokar commented on Getting a Gemini API key is an exercise in frustration   ankursethi.com/blog/gemin... · Posted by u/speckx
transcriptase · 6 days ago
The entire lab supply industry is disgusting in this respect. The funding (and recent grants) that a given professor or research lab has is generally publicly available information that vendors will buy in easily digestible formats from brokers and companies that scrape the websites of major granting agencies.

All of their products, however realistically commoditized, will require a drawn out engagement with a rep who knows how much money you’ve received recently and even has an outline what research you plan to do over the next few years since even the detailed applications often get published alongside funding allocations.

The exact same piece of equipment, consumables required to use it, and service agreements might be anywhere from X to 10X depending on what they (as a result of asymmetrically available knowledge) know you need and how much you could theoretically spend.

lokar · 6 days ago
A group of research universities should start a non-profit co-op to produce this for them.

Getting just the university of California should be enough critical mass.

lokar commented on How Much Wealth an AI Stock Market Crash Could Destroy   economist.com/interactive... · Posted by u/skx001
lateforwork · 6 days ago
Counter argument: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/09/business/wall-street-valu...

Excerpts:

In the 1990s and early 2000s, many of the companies leading the stock rally were not making much money, if any. This led to very high P/E ratios for some companies because share prices kept going higher, even when earnings were lagging well behind.

While Nvidia’s stock price has risen roughly 1,000 percent over the past three years, from $17 to $180, its earnings — the actual money it is making — have increased even faster. This means the stock is arguably cheaper today than it was three years ago, said Stacy Rasgon, a stock analyst at AB Bernstein.

lokar · 6 days ago
In the case of nvidia, the price is based on expectations of future revenue, not current. And the future numbers are clouded by a web of opaque circular deals with customers.
lokar commented on How Much Wealth an AI Stock Market Crash Could Destroy   economist.com/interactive... · Posted by u/skx001
vanschelven · 6 days ago
I've never felt right about the framing of "destroying wealth" when stock prices go to some new number. If anything, the word "reflecting" seems more applicable?
lokar · 6 days ago
For my financial planning, I discount my stock portfolio by 20%

u/lokar

KarmaCake day4291August 23, 2019View Original