Readit News logoReadit News
lmf4lol commented on Bronze Age mega-settlement in Kazakhstan has advanced urban planning, metallurgy   archaeologymag.com/2025/1... · Posted by u/CGMthrowaway
SilverElfin · 16 days ago
> ancient civilizations including the Bronze Age were much more advanced than we think.

I think part of the reason people tend to underestimate ancient civilizations is because there is only so much preserved, especially because so much of their culture and knowledge was passed on orally, rather than documented in writings. Even if we come up with more archaeological findings or new technology to analyze it, there’s a limit to how much we can know.

But another culprit in this underestimation is supremacist thinking. For example, there is a tendency to elevate the Abrahamic religions (Judaism, Christianity, and Islam) above others. The older cultures and religions are often described with pejoratives like “pagan”. In many countries, the history that is “worth studying” is seen as only starting a couple thousand years ago. Another aspect is racial supremacist thinking - I think this is still vast even though progress has been made on the issue of race. For example, textbooks and classes tend to not spend much time acknowledging the mathematical and scientific discoveries of the ancient world.

I hope it improves but I also think there are serious social/tribal problems today that will prevent people from exploring all this with genuine curiosity.

lmf4lol · 16 days ago
I see the same thinking in philosophy. We know a lot about the great thinkers of the West, from Plato to Aristoteles, to Jesus, to Thomas van Acquin, to Descartes, to Kant, to Hegel, to Nietsche, to Heidegger, to Foucoult, and so on... Its one western-european based lineage. And many of the western philosophers were supremacists indeed. They saw western philosophy as the pinaccle of human thought. The most advanced way of reasoning and understanding . This mindset obviously got them trapped.

But there is much to learn from other philosophies. China is the worlds oldest continuous civilization. Surely there were some great thinkers besides Konfuzius. Same with India. I attended last week a lecture about the Upanishads. And so much of the wisdom in there can be mapped, more or less specifically, to wisdom from Western philosophy. There is an interesting field of study emerging: Comparative Philosophy. ith the aim to bring it all together. (See for instance, https://studiegids.universiteitleiden.nl/courses/133662/comp...).

lmf4lol commented on AI Adoption Rates Starting to Flatten Out   apolloacademy.com/ai-adop... · Posted by u/toomuchtodo
data-ottawa · 18 days ago
It depends on a lot of things.

I know JavaScript on a pretty surface level, but I can use Claude to wire up react and tailwind, and then my experience with all the other programming I’ve done gives me enough intuition to clean it up. That helps me turn rough things into usable tools that can be reused or deployed in small scale.

That’s a productivity increase for sure.

It has not helped me with the problems that I need to spend 2-5 days just thinking about and wrapping my head around solutions to. Even if it does come up with solutions that pass tests, they still need to be scrutinized and rewritten.

But the small tasks it’s good at add up to being worth the price tag for a subscription.

lmf4lol · 18 days ago
Do you feel like you begin to _really_ understand React and Tailwind? Major tools that you seem to use now.

Do you feel that you will become so well-versed in it that you will be able to debug weird edge cases in the future?

Will you be able to reason about performance? Develop deep intuition why pattern X doesn't work for React but pattern Y does. etc?

I personally learned for myself that this learning is not happening. My knowledge of tools that I used LLMs for stayed pretty superficial. I became dependent on the machine.

lmf4lol commented on AI Adoption Rates Starting to Flatten Out   apolloacademy.com/ai-adop... · Posted by u/toomuchtodo
alephnerd · 18 days ago
But the vast majority are still using an IDE - and I say this as someone who has adamantly used Vim with plugins for decades.

Something similar will happen with agentic workflows - those who aren't already productive with the status quo will have to eventually adopt productivity enhancing tooling.

That said, it isn't too surprising if the rate of AI adoption starts slowing down around now - agentic tooling has been around for a couple years now, so it makes sense that some amount of vendor/tool rationalization is kicking in.

lmf4lol · 18 days ago
I think no one can predict what will happen. We need to wait until we can empirically observe who will be more productive on certain tasks.

Thats why I started with AI coding. I wanted to hedge against the possibility that this takes off and I am useless. But it made me sad as hell and so I just said: Screw it. If this is the future, I will NOT participate.

lmf4lol commented on AI Adoption Rates Starting to Flatten Out   apolloacademy.com/ai-adop... · Posted by u/toomuchtodo
ciconia · 18 days ago
> I don't use it anymore for coding

I'm curious, can you expand on this? Why did you start using coding agents, and why did you stop?

lmf4lol · 18 days ago
I started to code with them when Cursor came out. I've built multiple projects with Claude and thought that this is the freaking future. Until all joy disappeared and I began to hate the whole process. I felt like I didn't do anything meaningful anymore, just telling a stupid machine what I want and let it produce very ugly output. So a few months, I just stopped. I went back to VIM even....

I am pretty idealistic coder, who always thought of it as an art in itself. And using LLMs robbed me of the artistic aspect of actually creating something. The process of creating is what I love and like and what gives me inspiration and energy to actually do it. When a machine robs me of that, why would I continue to do it? Money then being the only answer... A dreadful existence.

I am not a Marxist, probably bceause I don't really understand him, but I think LLM is "detachment of work" applied to coders IMHO. Someone should really do a phenomenological study on the "Dasein" of a coder with LLM.

Funnily, I don't see any difference in productivity at all. I have my own company and I still manage to get everything done on deadline.

lmf4lol commented on AI Adoption Rates Starting to Flatten Out   apolloacademy.com/ai-adop... · Posted by u/toomuchtodo
lmf4lol · 18 days ago
The number of use cases for which I use AI is actually rapidly decreasing. I don't use it anymore for coding, I don't use it anymore for writing, I don't use it anymore for talking about philosophy, etc. And I use 0 agents. even though I am (was) the author of multiple MCP servers. It's just all too brittle and too annoying. I feel exhausted when talking to much to those "things".... I am also so bored of all those crap papers being published about LLM. Sometimes, there are some gems but its all so low-effort. LLM papers bore the hell out of me...

Anyway, By cutting out AI for most of my stuff, I really improved my well-being. I found the joy back in manual programming, because I am one of the few soon that will actually understand stuff :-). I found the joy in writing with a fountain pen in a notebook and since then, I retain so much more information. Also a great opportunity for the future, when the majority will be dumbed down even more. And for philosophical interaction. I joined an online University and just read the actual books of the great thinkers and discuss them with people and knowledgable teachers.

For what I use AI still is to correct my sentences (sometimes) :-).

It's kinda the same than when I cut all(!) Social Media a while ago. It was such a great feeling to finally get rid ot all those mind-screwing algorithms.

I don't blame anyone if they use AI. Do what you like.

lmf4lol commented on Show HN: An A2A-compatible, open-source framework for multi-agent networks   github.com/openagents-org... · Posted by u/snasan
hamandcheese · a month ago
A major reason agentic LLMs are so promising right now is because they just Figure It Out (sometimes).

Either the AI can figure it out, and it doesn't matter if there is a standardized protocol. Or the AI can't figure it out, and then it's probably a bad AI in the first place (not very I).

The difference between those two possibilities is a chasm far too wide to be bridged by the simple addition of a new protocol.

lmf4lol · a month ago
I think that‘s a bit shortsighted.

Having A2A is much more efficient and less error prone. Why would I want to spend tons of token on an AI „figuring it out“, if I can have the same effect for less using A2A? we can even train the LLMs with A2A in mind, further increasing stability and decreasing cost.

A human can also figure everything out, but if I come across a well engineered REST API with standard oauth2 , I am productive within 5 minutes.

lmf4lol commented on Learn Prolog Now (2006)   lpn.swi-prolog.org/lpnpag... · Posted by u/rramadass
ux266478 · a month ago
Prolog really is such a fantastic system, if I can justify its usage then I won't hesitate to do so. Most of the time I'll call a language that I find to be powerful a "power tool", but that doesn't apply here. Prolog is beyond a power tool. A one-off bit of experimental tech built by the greatest minds of a forgotten generation. You'd it find deep in irradiated ruins of a dead city, buried far underground in a bunker easily missed. A supercomputer with the REPL's cursor flickering away in monochrome phosphor. It's sitting there, forgotten. Dutifully waiting for you to jack in.
lmf4lol · a month ago
When I entered university for my Bachelors, I was 28 years old and already worked for 5 or 6 years as a self-taught programmer in the industry. In the first semester, we had a Logic Programming class and it was solely taught in Prolog. At first, I was mega overwhelmed. It was so different than anything I did before and I had to unlearn a lot of things that I was used to in "regular" programming. At the end of the class, I was a convert! It also opened up my mind to functional programming and mathematical/logical thinking in general.

I still think that Prolog should be mandatory for every programmer. It opens up the mind in such a logical way... Love it.

Unfortunately, I never found an opportunity in my 11 years since then to use it in my professional practice. Or maybe I just missed the opportunities?????

lmf4lol commented on VLC's Jean-Baptiste Kempf Receives the European SFS Award 2025   fsfe.org/news/2025/news-2... · Posted by u/kirschner
cornhole · a month ago
I met that guy during a gsoc mentor summit and it inspired me, out of spite, to never install VLC on any device I own
lmf4lol · a month ago
He is French. Cut him some slack ;-)

/s obviously

lmf4lol commented on "ChatGPT said this" Is Lazy   terriblesoftware.org/2025... · Posted by u/ragswag
insin · 2 months ago
I'm starting to run into the other end of this as a reviewer, and I hate it.

Stories full of nonsensical, clearly LLM-generated acceptance requirements containing implementation details which are completely unrelated to how the feature actually needs to work in our product. Fine, I didn't need them anyway.

PRs with those useless, uniformly-formatted LLM-generated descriptions which don't do what a PR description should do, with a half-arsed LLM attempt at summary of the code changes and links to the files in the PR description. It would have been nice if you had told me what your PR is for and what your intent as the author is, and maybe to call out things which were relevant to the implementation I might have "why?" questions about. But fine, I guess, being able to read, understand and evaluate the code is part of my job as a reviewer.

---- < the line

PRs littered with obvious LLM comments you didn't care enough to take out, where something minor and harmless, but _completely pointless_ has been added (as in if you'd read and understood what this code does, you'd have removed it), with an LLM comment left in above it AND at the end of the line, where it feels like I'm the first person to have tried to read and understand the code, and I feel like asking open-ended questions like "Why was this line added?" to get you to actually read and think about what's supposed to be your code, rather than a review comment explaining why it's not needed acting as a direct conduit from me to your LLM's "You're absolutely right!" response.

lmf4lol · 2 months ago
Stupid question maybe, but are there no company guidelines? How can this be acceptable in the company culture?

u/lmf4lol

KarmaCake day74October 10, 2024View Original