It's almost as if (bear with me ...) these "artificial intelligences" actually need "human intelligences" to guide them. Maybe we can think up a "system" where "experts" can codify rules for the "artificial intelligence" to follow.
Ok the sarcasm got too thick but my point is if the engineer has to spend the time to comb thousands of examples then you don't have AI you have a man in a box pretending to be a machine that plays chess.
We have human teachers for much the same reasons.
Are humans just other humans hiding in boxes pretending to play chess?
If you're genuinely innocent, the 2 years is horrid. If you're actually guilty, it's a cheap way to serve your time.
It's a weird and perverse law that shouldn't exist, but it's likely in time the government will need to move the needle one way or the other, as habitual criminals are getting used to doing the maths.
If the punishment for rape is harsher than the punishment for murder than anyone committing it may as well remove the evidence by using a blender.