I ask because I'm starting my masters in CS, but I've also been going to workshops/events at a local citizen bio lab and really enjoying it. I'd really like to go deeper into the cross-section of CS and Bio, specifically the kinds of things listed in this repo (modeling biological phenomenon as formal systems, using computation to simulate those systems, etc.)
But when I look at potential programs to pursue after my CS course, I get a bit lost in all the different titles—bioinformatics, systems biology, computational biology, etc. It's hard for an outsider in the field to discern any meaningful delineation. Does anyone with experience in the field know what category of study these resources would fall under, from a university perspective?
Of those bioinformatics is more specific (usually genomics data); the other two are overlapping and pretty non-specific terms.
For example I started a Sys Bio PhD and ended up in a Comp Bio research group. A friend started the same way but ended up in control theory/microbiology.
The title and even the department are somewhat arbitrary and more to do with the organisation at the university than anything else (e.g. I was in CS but my friend was Engineering I think).
If you can find a good interdisciplinary course they will be familiar with people moving around depending on their interests.
Try turning off javascript.
Edit: change "radii" to "diameters"
https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=1+au+%2F+radius+of+the...
Physicists normally care little whether their mathematical tools are formally proven correct. See: the Feynman path integral. It makes sense and gives correct answers, but as far as I know, it has no rigorous mathematical basis.
In most cases 'correct' isn't an option, rather a degree of accuracy. If it's consistent with the measurements, or even better if it has predictive power, then it's useful.
(Assuming you're not referring to it literally being a well known password from a web comic.)
I want to stop using Google, but please realize that DuckDuckGo is only competitive with Google if English is your only language (maybe even only if you're American?). There are loads and loads of people on HN for whom DDG is a poor experience.
In my experience DDG is extremely poor for localized results, especially those in other languages than English. Previously I recommended StartPage.com for my fellow Europeans, but StartPage has been bought by a shady company [1] and should not be used anymore either. I have no recommendation anymore.
[1]: https://reclaimthenet.org/startpage-buyout-ad-tech-company/
Works fine in UK English too, although the "r:uk" modifier is often needed.
I'm not saying there's any alternative, ultimately, to the concept of an average consumption basket, just that methods of determining it might be different. When you have really limited data, you can look at it more closely, and you probably need to, to leverage the context because it's not going to be an unbiased sample.
In this case that someone is Greg Clark (Professor of Economics at UC Davis). The link goes direct to a .xlsx which reveals the "basket" and all the figures - it's a mixture of several (presumably average) wages and a "cost of living".
This is probably the research paper (2009) http://faculty.econ.ucdavis.edu/faculty/gclark/papers/Macroa...
Didn't anyone notice that it's basically impossible to save an html page today and have it load and render correctly and offline tomorrow?