Readit News logoReadit News
letsgo39 commented on Investors sue Treasury Department for blacklisting crypto platform Tornado Cash   nytimes.com/2022/09/08/bu... · Posted by u/CapitalistCartr
letsgo39 · 3 years ago
I just want to say, I find it very Orwellian that HN shuts down immediately any conversation about theft of IP through these 'archive.ph' links, and even removes the 'reply' button to ensure so.

Just watch how quickly this comment will disappear or get downvoted.

letsgo39 commented on Heavier cars are safer for their drivers, but far deadlier for everyone else   academic.oup.com/restud/a... · Posted by u/cwwc
gnicholas · 3 years ago
Worse for stopping distances though, especially to the extent that SUVs (very popular in the US) have a higher CoG and therefore the ABS has to be calibrated differently. The car is "safer" in that you won't die, but not safer in terms of avoiding accidents.
letsgo39 · 3 years ago
also maneuverability. If another SUV from the opposite side of the road gets in your lane, good luck avoiding it with a fast reaction.

Dead Comment

letsgo39 commented on Heavier cars are safer for their drivers, but far deadlier for everyone else   academic.oup.com/restud/a... · Posted by u/cwwc
spaghettiToy · 3 years ago
Does this apply to hitting trees/poles? That's a lot of extra force you need to stop.
letsgo39 · 3 years ago
Your own weight has to decelerate to a stop, and the force it takes for your head to go 60 to 0 doesn't change based on what's around you. What does change its that a heavy car may resist the obstacle more -> longer distance until stop -> longer time to stop -> your head has more time to stop -> lower deceleration force on your head.
letsgo39 commented on Heavier cars are safer for their drivers, but far deadlier for everyone else   academic.oup.com/restud/a... · Posted by u/cwwc
ldjkfkdsjnv · 3 years ago
Dead serious. Why would I take on more risk
letsgo39 · 3 years ago
because you would have some consideration for other people. But hey, there's no law that says you have to care so you can keep thinking the way you're thinking.
letsgo39 commented on Ask HN: How did you start higher education after 40?    · Posted by u/wizardofmysore
cdicelico · 3 years ago
I went straight to work and didn't get to college until 41/42. I'm working on my undergrad and plan to continue to my masters. I've found it incredibly rewarding for two main reasons.

First, since I have a career already, I'm free of the pressure to go to school for career purposes and can focus on something I enjoy, which also provides immense value to what I'm doing every day (I chose philosophy, much more relevant and practical than I think many realize).

Second, I enjoy the experience and get quite a bit more depth from it than I would have in my 20's. It's a richer, more meaningful experience now that I'm older, have a strong sense of who I am, and am not put off in the slightest by naysayers or influenced by people's opinions of what I should or shouldn't be doing. I have more maturity now than at any other time in my life, and this has served me well in the sense of approaching topics with intellectual humility and just enjoying the process of knowing nothing to knowing a little. I do all the reading and then some, reading far and wide as well as doing deep analysis, writing all my notes, reviewing, and doing practice essays, and I enjoy every bit of it rather than seeing it as a chore.

So, some initial thoughts for you, hope they're helpful. The only advice I can give is to enjoy it, realize it's a wonderful opportunity, be structured and disciplined with your time, and use your hard-earned experience to your advantage.

letsgo39 · 3 years ago
Can you expand on how you found philosophy practical?
letsgo39 commented on Cloudflare Warp   1.1.1.1... · Posted by u/humility
letsgo39 · 3 years ago
If you use Apple relay service is this still relevant?
letsgo39 commented on Amazon CEO says company will slow hiring rate, no hard return to office planned   theregister.com/2022/09/0... · Posted by u/belter
vanilla_nut · 3 years ago
"We don't have a plan to require people to come back... But we're going to proceed adaptively as we learn."

No plan to come back != a promise to never force employees back to the office. Paired with Amazon's continued commercial real estate investments (discussed in the article), that's a massive competitive disadvantage in the remote work space. As a remote worker who plans on buying a home and putting down roots in the small, middle-of-nowhere town I live in, no way in hell that I'd accept a job offer from a company that dangles RTO over my head like this.

Of course, Amazon is toxic enough to avoid anyway. But I hope other employers don't embrace this nonsense.

letsgo39 · 3 years ago
that's absolutely your right. But don't try to force what works for on everyone, or confuse your desire for what the market overall will do.

There will be plenty of remote work but the articles about death of in office are exaggerated. In a recent informal poll of a top VC startup CEOs (via a private mailing list) many were bragging about how they went back to the office and the benefits they are seeing as a result. However, this is an unpopular opinion you won't see on twitter.

Finally, if someone can hire you in the middle of nowhere they can also hire folks in South America which is a huge engineering demographic and currently underpaid. Same timezone. They can also more easily hire people in different timezones like India or Eastern Europe. Because of that, I do expect over time salaries of in person to diverge from salaries of remote work.

Remote work may still be a great value prop for people like you, but as I said don't pretend everyone is moving to remote work or expect the same benefits as those living in major urban hubs and showing up for work in person.

letsgo39 commented on Winamp 5.9   forums.winamp.com/showthr... · Posted by u/lamamama
letsgo39 · 3 years ago
Is this the digital equivalent of listening to tapes via a walkman?
letsgo39 commented on Is early-onset cancer an emerging global epidemic?   nature.com/articles/s4157... · Posted by u/v4dok
phkahler · 3 years ago
>> Increased use of screening programmes has contributed to this phenomenon to a certain extent, although a genuine increase in the incidence of early-onset forms of several cancer types also seems to have emerged.

How do they separate these two. Early testing is becoming more common so you expect to see more cancer simply due to looking for it.

Doc: Early screening has increased the 5-year survival rate for various cancers.

Patient: Of course it has, but will I live any longer?

letsgo39 · 3 years ago
You should be able to see the 'real' increase from death rates, assuming the cause of death is correctly identified as cancer pre or post mortem.

u/letsgo39

KarmaCake day29September 9, 2022View Original