Readit News logoReadit News
laundermaf commented on Ring0VBA – Getting Ring0 Using a Word Document   disrel.com/posts/Ring0VBA... · Posted by u/walterbell
wilhil · 3 years ago
Well... you can flash and update the firmware of a mobile connected via USB through a browser... so, not sure how accurate this is!
laundermaf · 3 years ago
To be fair, you're supposed to get a permission dialog and it seems you have to pick the specific device(s) to connect to them.

https://web.dev/usb/#get-access-to-usb-devices

However I suppose that the mere existence of this API means that there could be a way to bypass the request; The browser already does have full access to every device.

laundermaf commented on The hotel I booked online became a homeless shelter and no one told me   nytimes.com/2022/10/25/tr... · Posted by u/lxm
irjustin · 3 years ago
I've stopped booking through Kayak (used to be my favorite), other OTAs, even many budget airlines, because it's simply not worth the post booking headaches.
laundermaf · 3 years ago
Hotel searches on Kayak are pretty poor simply due to the fact that they somehow always show low-res images. I generally book on Agoda or search on Google Maps nowadays. Kayak is still my go-to for flights though.
laundermaf commented on The hotel I booked online became a homeless shelter and no one told me   nytimes.com/2022/10/25/tr... · Posted by u/lxm
imgabe · 3 years ago
I've completely sworn off third-party booking services. They never know what's going on and when anything goes wrong they just tell you they can't help you. Then the place tells you that they can't help you because you didn't book through them and they just point fingers at each other.

Better to book directly from whatever hotel / airline / whatever you want to use. Whatever savings you might get is not worth it and a lot of times hotels appreciate direct bookings and they're cheaper anyway.

laundermaf · 3 years ago
For flights yes, for hotels I suppose it varies on location.

In South East Asia hotels are cheaper on Agoda and even contacting the hosts directly wouldn't get you a better price most of the time. It's a waste of time to try so I stopped doing that.

laundermaf commented on The hotel I booked online became a homeless shelter and no one told me   nytimes.com/2022/10/25/tr... · Posted by u/lxm
MrJohz · 3 years ago
I'm currently on a holiday in Greece that we booked ourselves after talking to a travel agent. Her main contribution was suggesting an island to stay on, but all her other suggestions ended up being worse than the options we found for ourselves. For example, we wanted a quick cheap stay in Athens so we could see the sights, so she found us some hotels that were somewhat outside the city centre - I'm sure they were okay, but what we actually wanted (and ended up booking ourselves) was a holiday flat in the city centre with a perfect view of the Acropolis, the flexibility we needed to sort ourselves out for breakfast and lunch, and a much cheaper price point.

Likewise, we wanted to stay in a resort for a few days afterwards and relax, so she sent us some ideas, but they were so lacklustre that we almost gave up on the idea of that part of our holiday altogether. Then we found something ourselves that was much nicer, and have been enjoying lovely beaches and incredible food for the last few days.

Even her flights were weird choices that involved a lot of waiting around at airports and would have brought us back a day earlier - booking them ourselves got us cheaper and more convenient options.

I always assumed that a travel agent would be more convenient than looking for something yourself, but I was amazed at how poor our experience was using one. Less choice and flexibility, and as you say, less self-service, and for us self-service gave us exactly what we wanted.

laundermaf · 3 years ago
It's also possible that they suggested worse options just to get a bigger fee without looking more expensive than what you could find with a single search.

I think the best "cheap" travel agents nowadays would just do the job of searching for you for an explicit fee, and then just send you the links. This is generally useful when you have specific requests and not much time to find them.

laundermaf commented on macOS Ventura is now available   apple.com/newsroom/2022/1... · Posted by u/anuragsoni
BurningFrog · 3 years ago
Stopped reading at

> With Continuity Camera, Mac users can leverage the powerful camera system on iPhone to unleash a groundbreaking webcam experience

I don't have the energy to parse a lot of text like this...

laundermaf · 3 years ago
Hasn't 2000s+ Apple always talked that way in their marketing copy?
laundermaf commented on Curl doesn't add libproxy due to its quality issues   daniel.haxx.se/blog/2022/... · Posted by u/fagnerbrack
lightswitch05 · 3 years ago
I’ve written a library with zero production dependencies. Of course I have Jest as a development dependency which pulls in all sorts of stuff. It would be difficult to make a zero-dependency library. As for not having production libraries, this was my experience:

1. Using the https module directly was more work than I expected, especially with error handling. This made me really look forward to the new Fetch API coming out.

2. No CLI parser. Its not like parsing args is a LOT of work - but its also something that is already solved and having to write support for that directly was a bummer

3. No logging library. This one was pretty easy. Create a little class with logging levels. Again this is something that is very common that would have been nice to use a package for.

laundermaf · 3 years ago
What you describe is exactly why people use dependencies. You just decided to trade your time for the noble act of having “no production dependencies”, while one of the 275 modules installed by Jest (real number) stole your production secrets anyway.

As for point 2, Node 18.1 I think just introduced a native argument parser.

laundermaf commented on Show HN: Contact Form Delivery   sendfly.io... · Posted by u/stanmancan
laundermaf · 3 years ago
One of many, existed since at least 2013. The most popular one went bust since it was free and many more were born, bought and died since.

It’s good to keep seeing alternatives though since the lifespan of such services isn’t very long.

I myself ended up making my own version on AWS Lambda and SES and that worked well for 7 years without a change. This pattern is so common I think an example lives on AWS’ own help site.

laundermaf commented on State of CSS   web.dev/state-of-css-2022... · Posted by u/taubek
encryptluks2 · 3 years ago
Can't believe paged media isn't really supported yet. Trying to do anything like line numbers for legal documents or page numbers is an absolute nightmare.
laundermaf · 3 years ago
Page media has been supported for decades. Line numbers aren’t strictly related to page media. It’s hard to complain about the lack of in-depth support for a media that isn’t meant to display “the web”.

I do agree that it could be better. They have been adding print-related features though, at least I remember some in CSS3. CSS Colors Level 4 includes cmyk functions.

laundermaf commented on State of CSS   web.dev/state-of-css-2022... · Posted by u/taubek
dmitriid · 3 years ago
Make no mistake: dialog element is there only because browsers (and Chrome, first and formost) want to remove alert/prompt.

dialog was so problematic that the same people that are now promoting it were in favor of removing it entirely. Literally none of the issues were solved, but now it's a great new element that we all should use.

laundermaf · 3 years ago
Dialog is fine, but what I’m most excited is the upcoming Popup API. The finest part is that “the most recent popup gets the top-most layer”. You never have to fight z-index again because popups now live in a compositing layer outside the document itself (even though they’re still part of it), akin to position:fixed but without the conflicts.
laundermaf commented on State of CSS   web.dev/state-of-css-2022... · Posted by u/taubek
Semaphor · 3 years ago
Actual nesting is on the way [0], but for now you can already use :is() [1] in many cases.

[0]: https://blog.openreplay.com/modern-css-selectors/

[1]: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/:is

laundermaf · 3 years ago
:is() exclusively reduces nesting if your nest produces a single rule, which is the least common situation and is generally dealt with by just duplicating the selector rather than nesting.

u/laundermaf

KarmaCake day198August 25, 2022View Original