Readit News logoReadit News
l0t0b0r0s commented on Zelensky leaves White House after angry meeting   bbc.com/news/live/c625ex2... · Posted by u/yakkomajuri
rsyring · 6 months ago
There are plenty of us who are awake. But lots of the voting public wanted this man in office. And they are getting what they wanted, apparently, b/c he was clear about who he is and what he was going to do.

We'll have at least two years of this. One can hope 2026 will see a massive tide turn in congress and the Senate and maybe Trump will be impeached. But, it doesn't seem likely, and even if it happened, they can't impeach his entire administration so not sure how much can really change until 2028.

l0t0b0r0s · 6 months ago
> b/c he was clear about who he is and what he was going to do.

This was a much needed change; because it was insane having a dementia patient as a president. I dont mean that hyperbolically; the democratic party was ready to have him serve another 4 years when he couldnt hold his train of thought on the debate stage. The democratic party needs to explain why his mental condition was swept under the rug at the expense of the American people.

l0t0b0r0s commented on Zelensky leaves White House after angry meeting   bbc.com/news/live/c625ex2... · Posted by u/yakkomajuri
steve_adams_86 · 6 months ago
> (let's call it 22.47%... aka the percentage that voted for Kamala) know exactly what's going on

I thought like this but I've come to realize that a lot of Harris voters were suffering from illusions about the likely efficacy of the government she would form. Regardless of her own competence, the democratic party has serious issues, and not many Harris supporters were being honest (if they were aware) about this until well after they lost the election.

I think it's dangerous to think her voters know what's really going on. The issues are genuinely country-wide and not specific only to republicans.

More level-headed republicans are right about a lot of problems in the USA. They want government efficiency for good reasons. Is DOGE the right solution? Absolutely not, it's insane. But these people are happy to see certain initiatives because they're overdue, and they're not wrong about that. Free speech for example; that has become a bit more dodgy over the years. The western world is beginning to press on freedom of speech in subtle ways (especially in the UK), and a lot of republicans care (they should!) but virtually no democrats I know care.

I know the current administration (or X.com) is implementing the worst versions of these things, I don't support it at all, but my point is: there is good sense on both sides, yet also total nonsense on both sides.

That's my take from here in Canada, at least.

l0t0b0r0s · 6 months ago
I would opine that the people who wanted to elect a courtesan do not, infact, know exactly whats going on.
l0t0b0r0s commented on Zelensky leaves White House after angry meeting   bbc.com/news/live/c625ex2... · Posted by u/yakkomajuri
ohthehugemanate · 6 months ago
There is more than one way to stop being the leading economic and military stabilizing force in the world. The "table flip" doctrine is not generally considered to be among the top candidates for "responsible and stable" transfer of power.
l0t0b0r0s · 6 months ago
>There is more than one way to stop being the leading economic and military stabilizing force in the world.

haha. Oh really? Because historically its always been violence.

l0t0b0r0s commented on Suckless.org: software that sucks less   suckless.org/... · Posted by u/flykespice
abc123abc123 · 6 months ago
Nope. They are adults. If you have a problem, talk to the guy, if that doesn't work, block or leave.

I'm so sick and tired of the woke victimism ideology, but fortunately it is crashing and burning and we'll be right back to meritocracy and focus on technology. No code of conduct is the best code of conduct! =)

l0t0b0r0s · 6 months ago
Yeah I'm real tired of that ideology as well. Political correctness needs to die; sooner rather than later.
l0t0b0r0s commented on What's happening inside the NIH and NSF   science.org/content/blog-... · Posted by u/rrock
nmz · 6 months ago
> Doesnt matter how huge, its a waste of money doing DEI programs in Burma.

That's opinion.

> plenty of safe nuke plants running and they are building more for datacenters

Yeah, and they were doing it safely.

> not really a problem of government spending unless you are saying they should pay more? not sure what youre getting at

You do, you're just ignoring it on purpose.

> Yes it can I mean afterall we had no income tax during the industrial revolution

And now you do, because it was necessary, back when it was implemented... this is just ignoring economic history.

Also, Industrial revolution!? the 1800s!? huh!?

Of course there was small government back then, the government only worked for landowners, not blacks or even women. Just white land owners. There wasn't even plumbing back then on most of america, barely any public utility, hell there wasn't even electricity, there was literally nothing to do apart from not dying of cholera.

plus the slaves/women did everything for free and if they died you just replaced them.

> this was true when we hired people based on merit and not immutable characteristics.

Pretty sure you're still hiring doctors and people with degrees, just now you have to hire a black one sometimes. what's so bad about a 1% in diversity hires?

(also trans people have mutable charactistics, ha)

l0t0b0r0s · 6 months ago
>That's opinion.

That's opinion

>Yeah, and they were doing it safely.

That's opinion.

>And now you do, because it was necessary, back when it was implemented... this is just ignoring economic history.

You mean the centuries of history with public works projects that didnt require taxes?

>Also, Industrial revolution!? the 1800s!? huh!?

I obviously mean at the turn of the 20th century with the huge leaps in applied sciences and engineering giving us planes trains and automobiles. All done without taxes before 1913. You know, the greatest period of advancement in modern history?

>what's so bad about a 1% in diversity hires?

What's so good about it exactly? It does a disservice to everyone including the diversity hire.

>(also trans people have mutable charactistics, ha)

body dysmorphia is mental illness as evidenced by the ~40% suicide rate. Hows that for an opinion (Fact)?

l0t0b0r0s commented on Ugandan runner Jacob Kiplimo completes first ever sub-57 minute half marathon   cnn.com/2025/02/16/sport/... · Posted by u/mooreds
dan-robertson · 6 months ago
Heritability means that parents having a trait explains, in a statistical sense, some amount of how much a randomly chosen person has a trait. So some of heritability is genetics and some is the shared environment.

For example, someone is quite likely to speak the same first language as their parents, and for this reason, the statistics for heritability come up with a high number for how heritable a trait first language is. But this isn’t because of some English-speaking gene, it’s because lots of environmental conditions are common between parents and children.

The intuitive reason that the number of fingers on your hand is not heritable is because lots of the variation comes from injuries which are not explained very much by whether one’s parents lost fingers from injury. Genetic causes for an unusual number of fingers are much less common than accidents and so can’t cause much of the variation that is observed across a population.

Because it is quite reasonable to get a high heritability number for something that is not genetically determined (and a low number for something that is), one cannot really argue anything about genetic determinism from heritability numbers.

l0t0b0r0s · 6 months ago
>some of heritability is genetics and some is the shared environment.

This is not the definition of heritability you are mincing words.

Heres the definition of heritability:

(HAYR-ih-tuh-BIH-lih-tee) The proportion of variation in a population trait that can be attributed to inherited GENETIC factors.

>For example, someone is quite likely to speak the same first language as their parents, and for this reason, the statistics for heritability come up with a high number for how heritable a trait first language is.

you are conflating inheritability with heritability.

The reason we are able to have crops that yield more is because we genetically modified them to do so; not because we grew wild corn in the perfect environment.

l0t0b0r0s commented on Ugandan runner Jacob Kiplimo completes first ever sub-57 minute half marathon   cnn.com/2025/02/16/sport/... · Posted by u/mooreds
sethev · 6 months ago
You cited this reference up thread: "The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age". It should give you pause for your definition of heritability that this paper is saying it changes with age. As you point out a couple of comments later, genes don't change with age.

If you're going to cite heritability numbers, you have to use the technical definition of heritability (which is what these papers are using).

> Is this not what heritability means?

No, not at all.

l0t0b0r0s · 6 months ago
Heres the definition of heritability:

(HAYR-ih-tuh-BIH-lih-tee) The proportion of variation in a population trait that can be attributed to inherited genetic factors.

The study title is saying that heritability INCREASES with age: as you age your IQ is more closely correlated to the IQ of your parents from whom you inherited your genes from.

>As you point out a couple of comments later, genes don't change with age.

Your genes dont change but the correlation between you and your parents IQ does.

l0t0b0r0s commented on Carbon capture more costly than switching to renewables, researchers find   techxplore.com/news/2025-... · Posted by u/Brajeshwar
marssaxman · 6 months ago
You are mistaken; I never said any such thing.

Someone quoted a figure for electric car maintenance, as a downside to the technology. I remarked that this actually sounded pretty good, relative to my experience with ICE cars. Someone else observed that I could choose to buy cars with a lower maintenance cost. I agreed that this was true but explained why I prefer to do things the way I do. Then you came along with a chip on your shoulder and started griping, for reasons known only to yourself.

l0t0b0r0s · 6 months ago
>Someone quoted a figure for electric car maintenance, as a downside to the technology.

It is a downside compared to ICE maintenance which is significantly lower.

>Life is full of trade-offs: if I did that, I'd have to carry a loan

to which I replied there are plenty of cars sub 10K which you wouldnt need a loan for and that you could easily maintain for less than 1000/year

>I remarked that this actually sounded pretty good, relative to my experience with ICE cars

When I broke down the cost of the maintenance items YOU listed as over 1000/year over 10 years I said that those items you listed dont need maintenance every year, and the cost of replacing them is far less than 1000 dollars a year. To which you replied that I was nitpicking

> Then you came along with a chip on your shoulder and started griping, for reasons known only to yourself.

Im not griping I am just telling you that you are wrong when you say that 13k/10 years is cheaper than the maintenance items you listed. Just like the other guy said.

Then again you own a jeep and you know what they say about jeep: Just Empty Every Pocket :P

l0t0b0r0s commented on What's happening inside the NIH and NSF   science.org/content/blog-... · Posted by u/rrock
nmz · 6 months ago
> Its not our Job to aid the world. Foreign aid is a huge money laundering scam by and large. We have major problems here on our own shores.

Not that huge, not a scam either given America is so deeply hated on most of the world, America decided to fight and kill everyone who even thought about "communism" whatever that meant, USAID is its foreign marketing team. Seems like it doesn't want to market itself. that's fine, You also quoted medicare and snap there, I hope you're not one of those that think having well fed people and farmers is not part of a governments job.

> Good. Maybe we can actually build some more nuclear plants instead of having to fight green energy bureaucracy.

If you can't build a nuclear power plant safely, maybe you shouldn't build it at all. Also some firings were people who handle the nuclear weapons.

> Circumstantial timing. The FAA has been having close calls before it was gutted. The government can do more with less. The plane crashes will stop when we return to meritocracy.

It's so great that you mention doing more with less and a meritocracy in this instance given that, the washout rate for being an air traffic controller is incredibly high and there is a deficit of air traffic controllers.

https://www.cnn.com/audio/podcasts/one-thing/episodes/8b310a...

> The government can do more with less.

Can it though?

https://www.gq.com/story/no-irs-audits-for-the-rich

> The cuts are depleting the staff members who help ensure that taxpayers pay what they owe. As of [2017], the IRS had 9,510 auditors. That’s down a third from 2010. The last time the IRS had fewer than 10,000 revenue agents was 1953, when the economy was a seventh of its current size. And the IRS is still shrinking. Almost a third of its remaining employees will be eligible to retire in the next year, and with morale plummeting, many of them will.

> The plane crashes will stop when we return to meritocracy.

Return to when? When was this true?

l0t0b0r0s · 6 months ago
>Not that huge

Doesnt matter how huge, its a waste of money doing DEI programs in Burma.

>If you can't build a nuclear power plant safely

plenty of safe nuke plants running and they are building more for datacenters

>washout rate for being an air traffic controller is incredibly high

not really a problem of government spending unless you are saying they should pay more? not sure what youre getting at

>Can it though?

Yes it can I mean afterall we had no income tax during the industrial revolution

>Return to when? When was this true?

this was true when we hired people based on merit and not immutable characteristics.

l0t0b0r0s commented on Ugandan runner Jacob Kiplimo completes first ever sub-57 minute half marathon   cnn.com/2025/02/16/sport/... · Posted by u/mooreds
tptacek · 6 months ago
No, it very obviously is not. This isn't something we need to argue; you can simply go look it up. The number of fingers on your hands: not very heritable. Whether you wear lipstick: very heritable.

You can set your watch to people on message boards making arguments about the genetic determination of intelligence that rely almost entirely on heritability statistics. It seems pretty clearly to be a cargo culting phenomenon; how else could you have very specific heritability numbers without even knowing what the term means? I'm curious where you got it from.

l0t0b0r0s · 6 months ago
Polydactyly is a condition in which a baby is born with one or more extra fingers. It is a common condition that often runs in families.

Is this not what heritability means?

u/l0t0b0r0s

KarmaCake day2March 29, 2017View Original