And Ukrainians want to (and wanted to) fight. It's not like US psyops campaigns made them. Since 2014 they spent a lot of resources on fortifications, training, arms manufacture, etc.
In the future as the workforce shrinks and liabilities increase I imagine deficit spending will regularly exceed tax revenues.
Only because enough people believe that's true, and then only because there are aircraft carriers that convince people in other countries that it's in their best interest to use them.
Dollars are not worth anything.
Yes the govt has created a moral hazard where they can always just create more money to solve a problem, but inserting a ponzi scheme does not fix that
What do I get out of it?
Or are you claiming that the US has been in the situation of "risky economic situation (economic depression, loss of jobs etc)" for the past 15 years?
Slow-moving train wrecks are still train wrecks.
> When disagreeing, please reply to the argument instead of calling names.
Infrastructure is one of the most expensive things people interact with on a regular basis. Choices in how we build infrastructure redirects society's resources on a massive scale. So yes, I do think it's plausible that huge investments in water-resistant infrastructure and wasteful attempts to build Dubai-style island suburbs will redirect resources away from more important issues, like the pressing need in the US to fix existing bridges and roads, build 1.5 million more houses, earthquake-proof the infrastructure in the pacific northwest, and figure out how to get 4800 GW more on the electrical grid cleanly.
But back to the story at hand: a few motivated people can shore up Old Town Road. All they need is an economic reason to do it.
Identify people you trust on a subject, filter their claims through your own ideas about what is reasonable, and hope for the best.
You might still get it wrong. Such is life.