This is generally how land values work...
This is generally how land values work...
This in contrast to privately-held companies, which can and do have many owners, but whose owners are acquired through partnership, investment, key employees within the company, and M&A - but not through the sale of securities.
It's not like we pay the police $2,000 for each arrest, or pay the prison $500/night per inmate.
Does anyone know if these numbers were taken by adding up the costs of running a prison and police department and dividing by the number of arrests and inmates?
If so, it's a little disingenuous to make this argument.
Also, these cases are not about a 1:1 relationship of harm to society vs. cost of justice. If you let the crimes go, you'll have more people doing it because "everybody does it".
60 days in jail does seem pretty excessive though. If imagine tons of young kids or people in a rush would make a silly mistake.
Not in a direct sense - but civil asset forfeiture and arrest/citation quotas do incentivize individual officers to take actions that benefit their department's budget and their annual review, respectively.
> It's not like we [...] pay the prison $500/night per inmate
In the case of private prisons (which house 8% of the US prison population[0]), a per-prisoner stipend is the most popular[1] business model.
The government quite literally pays the prison company a fixed dollar amount per inmate-night, which the company then turns a profit on.
[0]: https://reason.org/wp-content/uploads/files/comparing_correc...
[1]: https://www.investopedia.com/articles/investing/062215/busin...
Facebook announced this before the Muller report was released.
The Facebook security post was updated April 18, 2019 at 7AM PT [1].
The Muller report was released "Thursday morning, shortly after 11 am [EDT]" [2]
[1] https://newsroom.fb.com/news/2019/03/keeping-passwords-secur...
[2] https://www.vox.com/2019/4/18/18411966/mueller-report-releas...
Disclosure: I work for a big tech company but not Facebook. All opinions are my own.
[0]: https://deadline.com/2019/04/redacted-robert-mueller-report-...
[1]: https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/muell...
[2]: https://www.cnbc.com/2019/04/15/mueller-report-expected-to-b...
If a company achieved AI that can identify effective alternatives, why wouldn't they just acquire the patents for all of those alternatives and prop up all the prices?
*At least my impression of Google and their structure/incentive system that pushes different groups to pursue the same thing and not succeed at any. Messaging is at the forefront in my mind.
Google is infamous for this sequence of events, time and time again:
1. We made this great new thing that's gonna change the way you verb! Hope you enjoy it!
2. (1-5 years of product stagnation)
3. Hey, thanks for the all the good times. We're closing the thing at the end of the year.
Amazon (for all their warts) is much more adept at keeping customer experience in their crosshairs.
Looks like[0] the real value of your average acre of US farmland is about 3x what it was fifty years ago. There's more data available if you want to drill down into cropland vs pastureland, and specific regions (e.g., Corn Belt vs the Southeast).
[0]: https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/farm-economy/land-use-land-v...