I'd love to give KOReader a try -- does anyone know if it can be used with library books, via overdrive or another integration? A quick search indicates KOReader doesn't work with DRM books, but I'm curious if someone has a solution.
I'd love to give KOReader a try -- does anyone know if it can be used with library books, via overdrive or another integration? A quick search indicates KOReader doesn't work with DRM books, but I'm curious if someone has a solution.
We are nowhere near generally intelligent software systems.
There could def be bugs I missed tho.
https://chat.openai.com/share/ef77507e-cb75-4112-97f1-a16cfc...
First run: 1. First, take the rabbit across the river and leave it on the other side. - https://imgur.com/a/ZwoBTah
Second run: 1. Take the rabbit across the river. - https://imgur.com/a/Faq95U5
Third run: 1. First, take the puma across the river and leave it on the other side. - https://imgur.com/a/eIUeHM3
> Note the rabbit doesn't eat carrots. Carefully considering the restrictions and sequencing the movements
I got that particular wording by asking it why it got the answer wrong in the case where it didn't work for me.
Interestingly, this underscores one of the points of the articles: giving the LLMs time to think, which is what this additional prompting seems to do.
First run: 1. First, take the rabbit across the river and leave it on the other side. - https://imgur.com/a/ZwoBTah
Second run: 1. Take the rabbit across the river. - https://imgur.com/a/Faq95U5
Third run: 1. First, take the puma across the river and leave it on the other side. - https://imgur.com/a/eIUeHM3
Over the last few months, I've seen dozens of people try hundreds of variations of that cabbage/goat/lion riddle and it failed all of them. I just tried it on GPT4 and it looks like it finally got "fixed" - it no longer ignores explicit instructions not to leave the lion and cabbage together.
However, it doesn't actually fix any reasoning ability in ChatGPT (It has none!). Changing cabbage/goat/lion to carrot/rabbit/puma respectively, for example:
> Suppose I have a carrot, a rabbit and a puma, and I need to get them across a river. I have a boat that can only carry myself and a single other item. I am not allowed to leave the carrot and puma alone together, and I am not allowed to leave the puma and rabbit alone together. How can I safely get all three across?
GPT4's response starts with "First, take the rabbit across the river and leave it on the other side.", ignoring the explicit instructions not to leave the puma and carrot alone together (the exact same failure mode as the previous variant).
Now that I've posted it, it will get fixed eventually - the cabbage/goat/lion fix took months. When it does I'll use "cheese/mouse/elephant" or something.
> 1, First, take the puma across the river and leave it on the other side.
Regarding type-checking, common lisp is expressive enough to support an ML dialect (see coalton), and is easily extended across paradigms [2]
I will be very happy if someone can list down the most important features that are lacking in Nyxt.
With AI tools, though, I can "read" Borges in his native language: with my phone + OCR + translate I have an English language companion. Or, using the voice interface I can try narrating the Spanish text and ask clarifying questions whenever I'm confused.
An author like Borges makes it well worth the extra effort. And, his puzzles often involve language, so the extra layer of mental translation can mirror the work itself, e.g. in his poem La luna [1]. (though, I envy your native Spanish)
1. https://www.gaceta.unam.mx/la-luna-un-poema-de-borges/