Realistically, Apple will eat much of the cost, but increase prices by 10-15%. Most other retailers are thinking the same.

This was noted in the Reuters article [0] this macrumors article stole content from:

> the company will have a tough time passing on more than 5% to 10% of the cost to consumers.

> "We expect Apple to hold off on any major increases on phones until this fall when its iPhone 17 is set to launch, as it is typically how it handles planned price hikes."

[0] - https://www.reuters.com/technology/will-trump-tariffs-make-a...

All the unis are infected with former corpo programmers who push their preferred employer stacks. Students get free credits to use on Azure. Some of them become gov employees or consultants. You end up with all sides agreeing Microsoft Azure is the most trustworthy solution.

Everything gov in my country seems to be built with asp.net to point where its often requirement in the contract.

Lets start with erasing all the proprietary tech taught at universities. Microsoft can do their education. Universities dont have to do it for them for free.

> Although about 3 million computers get sold every year in China, people don’t pay for the software. Someday they will, though. And as long as they’re going to steal it, we want them to steal ours. They’ll get sort of addicted, and then we’ll somehow figure out how to collect sometime in the next decade.

[1] https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2006-apr-09-fi-micro...