I never considered that possibility.
I guess my other question is word processing programs usually have a target format of paper ... is that how you're still using it?
Deleted Comment
I never considered that possibility.
I guess my other question is word processing programs usually have a target format of paper ... is that how you're still using it?
SELECT * FROM X, into a C# list, Filter it with LINQ, and then use C# to do calculations
"Why not EF?" "Someone told me it was slower"
I've also seen "Ask ChatGPT if you're doing X right?", and basically signing off whatever it recommends without checking
At this point I'm pretty confident I could trojan horse whatever decision I want from certain people by sending enough screenshots of ChatGPT agreeing with me
All of this stuff needs to be stored on the server anyway… otherwise how will you get it back on the page when I switch computers or pull it up on my phone.
Some will manually push a History entry, but not all
Does this mean that other languages might offer better information density per token? And does this mean that we could invent a language that’s more efficient for these purposes, and something humans (perhaps only those who want a job as a prompt engineer) could be taught?
Kevin speak good? https://youtu.be/_K-L9uhsBLM?si=t3zuEAmspuvmefwz
English (And any of the dominant languages that you could use in it's place) work significantly better than other languages purely by having significantly larger bodies of work for the LLM to work from
There must be something strange going on (most likely training on each others' wrong outputs, but I dunno)