You will struggle to raise funds if the companies you bet on perform poorly; the worse your track record the less chances of raising money and earn income from it.
I mean it probably depends on the LP and what is their vision. Not all apples are red, come in many varieties and some for cider others for pies. Am I wrong?
Open source LLMs exist and will get better. Is it just that all these companies will vie for a winner-take-all situation where the “best” model will garner the subscription? Doesn’t OpenAI make some substantial part of the revenue for all the AI space? I just don’t see it. But I don’t have VC levels of cash to bet on a 10x or 100x return so what do I know?
To be able to achieve that is entirely dependent on two things:
1) deploying capital in the current fund on 'sexy' ideas so they can tell LPs they are doing their job
2) paper markups, which they will get, since Ilya will most definitely be able to raise another round or two at a higher valuation. even if it eventually goes bust or gets sold at cost.
With 1) and 2), they can go back to their existing fund LPs and raise more money for their next fund and milk more fees. Getting exits and carry is just the cherry on top for these megafund VCs.
New timeline means 16 to 17 years between planning and operation, thus 16-17 years of CO2 and pollution before a single kWh
https://www.wabe.org/new-delay-for-georgia-nuclear-reactors-...
we are running out of time! the transition to WWS is faster and cheaper.
see: https://web.stanford.edu/group/efmh/jacobson/Articles/I/WWS-...