The $15 adapter is most likely of similar quality as the DAC and other audio components in the phone, so I don’t see the point. (Also, most people I know with $1000 headphones use an external audiophile-grade DAC anyway.)
They might, but why should they have to? That tiny ESS DAC in LG phones is measurably better than a lot of external "audiophile-grade" DACs. It doesn't compromise the design or the water resistance of the phone either and probably doesn't add much cost relative to other components.
This is basically an arrogant move that can't really be technically justified.
E.g. By arguing that better external options exist - better external cameras also exist, should we get rid of the camera too?
I'm confused. If you've got an encrypted drive the encryption keys are usually stored in a TPM module right? How does accessing RAM allow access to the keys in a hardware TPM?
This is basically an arrogant move that can't really be technically justified. E.g. By arguing that better external options exist - better external cameras also exist, should we get rid of the camera too?