Readit News logoReadit News
iscoelho commented on Green card interviews end in handcuffs for spouses of U.S. citizens   nytimes.com/2025/11/26/us... · Posted by u/nxobject
aikinai · 22 days ago
Yes, exactly. Your legal options are to either remain separated for one or two years while you wait, or the American can immigrate to the spouse’s country and wait there (since almost every other country is easier to immigrate to).

It's an inhumane system, but as someone heavily impacted by US immigration policy, I'd much prefer they enforce the laws evenly and then fix them where they're broken rather than disadvantaging everyone going through the legal process while those that cheat get to jump ahead.

iscoelho · 22 days ago
> I'd much prefer they enforce the laws evenly and then fix them where they're broken rather than disadvantaging everyone going through the legal process while those that cheat get to jump ahead.

That is incredibly optimistic to believe that any legislation reforming immigration will be passed in the next decade.

There is a reason ICE was neutralized until now. Life is short. We don't have time for congress to play politics while Americans and their spouses suffer. Let people live their lives.

iscoelho commented on Green card interviews end in handcuffs for spouses of U.S. citizens   nytimes.com/2025/11/26/us... · Posted by u/nxobject
foogazi · 22 days ago
> It's a catch-22

What do immigration attorneys recommend in this scenario?

I don’t get the catch-22, time’s up & you leave

Happens to H1Bs all the time

iscoelho · 22 days ago
Your immigration attorney will advise that you overstay. If you do not, your application will be abandoned.
iscoelho commented on Gov. Abbott's office redacts pages of emails about Elon Musk   kut.org/politics/2025-11-... · Posted by u/pavel_lishin
edoceo · a month ago
Can't demonstrate quid-pro-quo of the details are redacted.
iscoelho · a month ago
Negotiating is difficult if you show your hand. It is arguably beneficial to both the state and Elon that the e-mails stay redacted. I agree it is unfortunate though.
iscoelho commented on Gov. Abbott's office redacts pages of emails about Elon Musk   kut.org/politics/2025-11-... · Posted by u/pavel_lishin
jeffbee · a month ago
> a large employer ... with legal hurdles ... in email exchanges with senior politicians.

This is how corruption is defined.

iscoelho · a month ago
If the result of the negotiations are in good faith and beneficial for his constituents, then it is not corruption. Of course, that's open to interpretation.

Corruption is usually when there is personal benefit to the politician themselves.

iscoelho commented on FFmpeg to Google: Fund us or stop sending bugs   thenewstack.io/ffmpeg-to-... · Posted by u/CrankyBear
strictnein · a month ago
No one is saying #1. No one is arguing against #2. #3 is something all companies with significant reliance on OSS projects should help do.

The only thing that defies logic is how poorly your strawman is constructed.

iscoelho · a month ago
It appears we are not reading the same thread.
iscoelho commented on FFmpeg to Google: Fund us or stop sending bugs   thenewstack.io/ffmpeg-to-... · Posted by u/CrankyBear
Espressosaurus · a month ago
DNG isn't exactly rarely used, it's Adobe's open raw format and lots of image processing programs read and write it.

It's not a codec made for one game back in 1994, it's still in very active use today if you're using such a rare and uncommon program as Photoshop.

iscoelho · a month ago
I agree it is a widely used format, however, it is rarely used on iOS devices.
iscoelho commented on FFmpeg to Google: Fund us or stop sending bugs   thenewstack.io/ffmpeg-to-... · Posted by u/CrankyBear
fulafel · a month ago
There's no exploit on the bug report at least, unless you consider the crash reproducer one.
iscoelho · a month ago
UAF bugs lead to RCE exploit chains.
iscoelho commented on FFmpeg to Google: Fund us or stop sending bugs   thenewstack.io/ffmpeg-to-... · Posted by u/CrankyBear
xethos · a month ago
From TFA:

> The latest episode was sparked after a Google AI agent found an especially obscure bug in FFmpeg. How obscure? This “medium impact issue in ffmpeg,” which the FFmpeg developers did patch, is “an issue with decoding LucasArts Smush codec, specifically the first 10-20 frames of Rebel Assault 2, a game from 1995.”

This doesn't feel like a medium-severity bug, and I think "Perhaps reconsider the severity" is a polite reading. I get that it's a bug either way, but this leaves me with a vague feeling of the ffmpeg maintainer's time being abused.

iscoelho · a month ago
The vulnerability in question is being severely underestimated. There are many other comments in this thread going into detail. UAF = RCE.
iscoelho commented on FFmpeg to Google: Fund us or stop sending bugs   thenewstack.io/ffmpeg-to-... · Posted by u/CrankyBear
bigstrat2003 · a month ago
Sure, it's a valid bug report. But I don't understand why there has been so much drama over this when all the ffmpeg folks have to do is say "sorry, this isn't a priority for us so we'll get to it as soon as we can" and put the issue in the backlog as a low priority. If Google wants the issue fixed faster, they can submit a fix. If they don't care enough to do that, they can wait. No big deal either way. Instead, ffmpeg is getting into a public tiff with them over what seems to be a very easily handled issue.
iscoelho · a month ago
FFMPEG is upset because Google made the exploit public. They preferred that it remained a zero-day until they decided it was a priority.

I don't understand how anyone believes that behavior is acceptable.

iscoelho commented on FFmpeg to Google: Fund us or stop sending bugs   thenewstack.io/ffmpeg-to-... · Posted by u/CrankyBear
SR2Z · a month ago
So you don't have a line, you just want to move the goalposts and keep moving them?
iscoelho · a month ago
It is my understanding that the commenters in FFMPEG's favor believe that Google is doing a disservice by finding these security vulnerabilities, as they require volunteer burden to patch, and that they should either:

1) allow the vulnerabilities to remain undiscovered & unpatched zero-days (stop submitting "slop" CVEs.)

2) supply the patches (which i'm sure the goalpost will move to the maintainers being upset that they have to merge them.)

3) fund the project (including the maintainers who clearly misunderstand the severity of the vulnerabilities and describe them as "slop") (no thank you.)

This entire thread defies logic.

u/iscoelho

KarmaCake day585January 18, 2017View Original