1) get the best quality, ultra high headroom, system money can rent
2) get a high quality monitoring system for the DJs
3) find a venue as remote as I can
4) go turn down the master volume on the main desk every now and then :)
Designing a controller for his machines and as much as I would love to put the thing as OH, I don’t even think of it.
His company:
I wondered what geometry kernel it was going to use! Interesting to me how few of these there are. Some of the solid modeling stuff is nearly 40 years old (parasolid) this must be hard.
That being said, for CAD (personal usage) I switched from Fusion 360 to Freecad 1.0 with almost no project and the latter is an order of magnitude faster.
I consider it one of mankind’s greatest achievement.
`pixi` basically covers `conda` while using the same solver as `uv` and is written in Rust like `uv`.
Now is it a good idea to have python's package management tool handle non-python packages? I think that's debateable. I personally am in favor of a world where `uv` is simply the final python package management solution.
Wrote an article on it here: https://dublog.net/blog/so-many-python-package-managers/
It’s fast, takes yml files as an input (which is super convenient) and super intuitive
Quite surprised it isn’t more popular
On the other hand electronics CAD had been run mainly on Solaris decades ago, but for the last 20 years Linux has been the most likely host, including for the most expensive commercial professional solutions.
I have never heard of anyone using macOS for any kind of electronics design.