Is there equvalent to SvelteKit for Solidjs?

Interestingly, the SEC and Gary did not publish any tweet or press release..

Will keep happening because peer review itself, ironically, has no real feedback mechanism.

It's not about the publishing itself, it is all about the review.

Anyone with an internet connection can write a "paper" and publish it, but that doesn't mean it is useful to the scientific community. Peer review allows the community to filter out quack papers, research which is inherently flawed, or research which has been done before.

This leaves the journals filled with novel research meeting a minimum quality standard, allowing other scientists to build upon them. If you can't get your research published it ostensibly isn't worth anything, so a lot of institutions use the number of papers published and the citations they get as a measurement of a researcher's output. There is nothing wrong with this process.

However, the issue is that journals have been captured by rent-seeking publishers who charge exorbitant fees. This is made even worse because some journals have historically been more strict than others, so getting a paper published in a strict one leads to a higher valuation - and of course the publishers charge higher fees for the more prestigious journals.

Changing this entire model is difficult. Publishing in one of those journals is literally how your worth is valued. Breaking this circle can be done, but it won't be easy.

What's the business model to work within open source crypto as a full time job?

I would consider myself pretty close to an expert with JavaScript. I've been using it for 5 years professionally, currently use ES2020. Fairly familiar with Node 12, V8, etc. But I'm always worried about those situations where you dont know what you dont know. This might sound strange, but would anyone recommend any reading material or blogs for someone at my level?

Just an arXiv with peer-review is not enough. There is a lot of room for innovation and improvement. There was quite an interesting discussion[1] about creating something in between Overleaf[2], ArXiv[3], Git, and Wikipedia, moreover with the ability to do a peer-to-peer review, discussion, and social networking. Check out the last[4] article in that series. There are a few implementations, albeit not covering all features, like Authorea[5] and MIT's PubPub[6] (it is the open source[7]). See also GitXiv[8]. See also the Publishing Reform[9] project. Moreover, there is quite an interesting initiative from DARPA, to create the scientific social network of a kind - Polyplexus[10].

[1] http://blog.jessriedel.com/2015/04/16/beyond-papers-gitwikxi...

[2] https://www.overleaf.com/

[3] https://arxiv.org/

[4] http://blog.jessriedel.com/2015/05/20/gitwikxiv-follow-up-a-...

[5] https://authorea.com/

[6] https://www.pubpub.org/

[7] https://github.com/pubpub

[8] https://medium.com/@samim/gitxiv-collaborative-open-computer...

[9] https://gitlab.com/publishing-reform/discussion

[10] https://polyplexus.com/