Dead Comment
A Fantastic show for tech optimists, imagining a world where Russians were the first to land on the moon. This spurred increased investment by the US, continuing the space race, avoided the cold war, adoption of EVs in the 80s, massive action on climate change, and many other fun things. I wishfully think of "what could have been", and a world that seems attainable.
One of the recurring plot points is Executive action taken by astronauts in space, wars avoided and caused by their decisions, brave rescues and other heroics. In one of the episodes a characters takes such an action.
In L.A., a new vision of incarceration proves rehabilitation works - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38844740
The Myth of Meritocracy Runs Deep in American History - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38844240
Psychopathic men have more children, study finds - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38824962
Brexit has failed for UK, say clear majority of Britons – poll - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38817190
Losing weight without any stress - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38815866
Florida health care can now be denied based on moral, ethical, religious beliefs - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35941427
I'm not mentioning these to start arguments about whether or not they are on-topic for HN—some are, some not—but rather to give the flavor of what the user flags look like.
We sometimes turn off flags, and I've done so several times on this topic and posted quite a bit about why. However, HN is not a current affairs site, and it is a site that gets damaged when threads turn into flamewars. So we have to be careful about which threads to turn off flags on, and I don't think an outright advocacy piece is the best choice for that. It's all relative; there's no way to avoid flamewars on a topic like this; but some go to the inner circles of hell faster than others.
Most wars are fought over borders. Land ownership is 0 sum game. Especially land blessed with natural resources. (Middle East is great example of oil wars)
In the 90s imperialism was popular - if you had the manpower and weapons, you’d take land from the weak.
Russia is playing land grab card against Ukraine.
Hamas is playing the land grab card against Israel. Although Israel being backed by US will inflict a lot more damage.
Africa is full of border conflicts for centuries. We don’t hear much about it since it’s a poor continent.
The US has the world’s largest military and a big part of what they do is to ensure their allies have their borders intact (NATO, Australia, Japan, S Korea etc).
So sinking some ships is likely gonna be met with some bombs on their military production facilities where missiles are made (if they figure it out).
For the world’s largest military, US holds much restraint not invading other countries borders, and helping democratic countries keep their borders intact.
If US unleashed colonialism card, we could be much larger than British empire. However the bitter lesson is that conquering is easy, maintaining power is way harder.
Seems China is holding restraint invading Taiwan until they see a clear win with a blitz, or another peaceful avenue.
What do you mean by that? Comparing Russia with Hamas seems like a massive distortion of reality, not sure you meant to do that.
Israel is occupying internationally recognized Palestinian lands of West Bank and a blockade on Gaza. Just yesterday the Israeli foreign minister suggested sending Israeli settlers into Gaza illegally and drive Palestinians out for good. Hamas is a terrorist organization, who kills civilians, but let's not pretend that the IDF is any better.
And the US is a colonial power of the 20th and 21st century. It just hasn't done it the same way as the Europeans of 17,18th,19th century, mostly because there are different tools available now: culture export, dependence on oil, dollar as reserve currency, global free trade, and the rise of corporations.
Noan Chomsky says the issue of Palestine is resistance against colonialism. [1] [2]
[1] https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=lUQ_0MubbcM&pp=QAFIAQ%3D%3D
[2] https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2023-12-02/israel-gaza...
I raised my eyebrow at "everyone takes" standard deduction. How is that possible with home prices and interest rates? Even a modest 300-400k house at 5-6% interest, property taxes, local sales tax deductions and minimum charity would exceed the standard deduction. Where I live good luck finding anything more than a condo for less than a million.
Turns out 90% take standard deduction. This is another way to track the extreme "wealth" gap emerging. Only the wealthy itemize.