Readit News logoReadit News
haizhung commented on Discord will require a face scan or ID for full access next month   theverge.com/tech/875309/... · Posted by u/x01
medbar · a day ago
What’s with this recent push for ID verification from every site and service?
haizhung · a day ago
Cowering to autocrats all over the world.
haizhung commented on Agent Skills   agentskills.io/home... · Posted by u/mooreds
sagarpatil · 7 days ago
So the only difference between slash custom command and agent skills is that they can be invoked only when needed instead of stuffing the whole markdown file? I’m trying to understand how is this different from what we already have in markdown files.
haizhung · 7 days ago
Correct. It helps by not distracting your LLM with a prompt that is, in X% of the cases, irrelevant to the task at hand.

However, when you DO need to do something special (like create a new endpoint), the LLM knows where to get more info on this.

Kinda like a library of „how to“ books.

haizhung commented on Repatriate the gold': German economists advise withdrawal from US vaults   theguardian.com/world/202... · Posted by u/vinni2
haizhung · 17 days ago
Why not just … sell the gold? What good is gold to a society anyway, regardless of where it is placed?

Instead of drawing the anger of the US, just .. slowly over time, sell all the gold off, and move the money back. And use it to build infrastructure or something. Much better than gold.

haizhung commented on I'm addicted to being useful   seangoedecke.com/addicted... · Posted by u/swah
haizhung · 22 days ago
Just a word of warning to not take this to the max. Do not define your personal self worth over how useful (you think) you are.

There’s a famous billionaire founder in Germany that attempted suicide just recently, because … he didn’t feel useful anymore.

https://7news.com.au/news/ex-boss-of-major-textile-brand-tri...

haizhung commented on On Being a Human Being in the Time of Collapse (2022) [pdf]   web.cs.ucdavis.edu/~rogaw... · Posted by u/barishnamazov
DoctorOetker · 25 days ago
do you have some sources or references for

1) the 50% net wealth tax vis-a-vis 1948 currency reform?

2) which 2 richest families in Germany hold more wealth than the bottom 50% combined?

3) most wealth distribution plots I have seen show a significant negative start (people in debt) then a large number of people with effectively 0 net wealth (what is earned is spent) and then a rise towards the haves. From such plots for different nations I am not surprised that the lower 2 digit percentages effectively have net 0 (with those in debt balancing those having a mediocre surplus), so it would seem trivial for this factoid to be true in many nations (with a slight change of the 50% number or a slight change of the exact number of richest families)

The perspective you give is certainly remarkable in the sense that the Nazi rise was basically a counterreaction to the rising popularity of communist ideas, with the end result... a redistribution of wealth after all, not even a holocaust could stop the wealth redistribution.

haizhung · 23 days ago
1) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lastenausgleich#:~:text=The%20...

2) https://www.die-linke.de/fileadmin/user_upload/20230530-PK-A...

3) theoretically people could own via the state: if the state has resources (eg. hospital buildings, schools) that benefits all people ~uniformly. However, due to privatization more and more government wealth is also sold off.

Wealth redistribution is the only way the living standards of ordinary families will improve. I’m just hoping we can skip the war part, this time. I think its possible.

haizhung commented on Eight European countries face 10% tariff for opposing US control of Greenland   apnews.com/article/denmar... · Posted by u/2OEH8eoCRo0
jijijijij · 25 days ago
The president who is willing to fix this will have to bend the knee. The US behavior is straight insulting and caused major economic damage. If your drunk uncle pointed a gun to your head, a simple "Sorry!" won't do.

Quite frankly, considering the wide diplomatic damage and collapsing influence, paired with its deep social, cultural and economic internal issues... I can totally see the US failing. They depend so much on power projection and economic influence, I don't see how they could possibly manage on their own. What will happen to the dollar if the US isn't guaranteeing stability anymore? The debt will explode and former allies may call on their stake. Due to the AI bubble, the American economy is worse than it looks. It may all come down together.

Is California going to hold the bag for Florida? What's being American other than an international embarrassment and a bully, at this point? How strong is the shared identity when it comes to it? With ICE and all, can they get over the differences in "opinion" about who's deserving human rights and who doesn't?

haizhung · 24 days ago
> The president who is willing to fix this will have to bend the knee.

A similar instance of this is happening currently in the talks between EU/UK — The EU is demanding a „Farage“ clause. They want a guarantee that the damages are paid for in case Farage becomes prime minister and will roll back all treaties and trade deals and what not.

Which, to be fair, makes total sense.

haizhung commented on On Being a Human Being in the Time of Collapse (2022) [pdf]   web.cs.ucdavis.edu/~rogaw... · Posted by u/barishnamazov
cycomanic · a month ago
This is one thing that I don't understand, take for example Germany, the population barely grew over the last 20 years [1], at the same time there has been a building boom that building costs have risen dramatically (more than doubled between 2010 and 2024). Compare that to the 60s and 70s where population was rising much faster in combination with the rebuilding effort. So is the growth of housing stock lower than the population growth? If yes how come that this was not the case when population growth was significantly faster (even 30 years ago). I don't recall there being more building going on when I was young than now, in fact if anything my impression is it's the other way around.

[1] https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/germany-popul...

haizhung · a month ago
This apparent conundrum breaks away if you consider who holds the wealth now vs. in the 60s. In the 60s-70s, there was a wealth tax in Germany. Shortly after WW2, a law was drafted to redistribute wealth: All individuals and companies whose assets remained largely intact were required to pay 50% of their net wealth (as assessed on the day of the 1948 currency reform).

This means that the working class had immense wealth and so simple jobs could support a family on a single income, buy a house, etc.

Compare that to today — the two richest families in Germany hold more wealth than the bottom 50% COMBINED.

It is no wonder that normal families cannot afford to buy property anymore; and are forced to rent. This further exacerbates the wealth gap.

Another nice statistic is the productivity VS wage VS pensions curve: https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!KDug!,f_auto,q_auto:...

(Black line - GDP, blue line - avg comp; red line - avg pension)

In short - the productivity increased; but ordinary people are being squeezed out of the gains regardless. No wonder that everyone turns sour at some point.

haizhung commented on Imagine 130M Washing Machines   scottsumner.substack.com/... · Posted by u/RickJWagner
Workaccount2 · a month ago
The easiest surefire way to lift the bottom of the economy right now is to go on a mass home building spree.

If people had their rents cut in half, it would solve most other money problems they complain about (shy of those who will just inflate their lives into being money constrained again).

Of course this will come mostly at the expense of regular middle-class homeowners, who will see the enormous paper gains of their properties in the last 5-10 years be decimated. Red or Blue, I don't care who, hates losing money and will emphatically vote against this happening.

haizhung · a month ago
No. Mass building (while not touching inequality) will NOT solve the issue.

It’s easy to see why: there already IS enough housing around for everybody. If there wasn’t, you would see a massive amount of homeless people. And even in the US where that might be the case - the amount of empty real estate is larger than the amount of homeless people. You could easily house them if you wanted. It’s a question of distribution.

The other reason to see why this doesn’t work is: there is no country that managed to do it. Miraculously, the housing crisis has hit all (western) countries on the planet. All of them try to build their way out of it, no one succeeds. Why?

If you just mass build, the new units will be bought immediately by the rich, and the working people will have no housing still.

haizhung commented on Lessons from 14 years at Google   addyosmani.com/blog/21-le... · Posted by u/cdrnsf
xboxnolifes · a month ago
How can inflation adjusted income be up and there still be an affordability crisis?
haizhung · a month ago
Housing is not part of the inflation calculation. There IS a housing inflation crisis.
haizhung commented on Lottocracy: Democracy Without Elections   lottocracy.org... · Posted by u/egghack
phtrivier · a month ago
The "let's pick people at random to discuss hairy topics" has been done at least three times in France in the form of "Convention Citoyenne".

In each case, people came up with relatively "popular" solutions (one of them is still in progress)

In each case, the elected officials all but ignored the output, on the ground that the body had not been elected, was manipulated by experts, had no responsibility and accountability, etc...

Anyone who solves this will indeed have found an improvement over elective democracy.

In the case of the US, a lower hanging fruit would be getting out of "elections that can easily be bought by corporations with litteral money".

haizhung · a month ago
Yep, people in this thread are claiming that this doesn’t work.

In fact, it does work, and it is already implemented! Here in Germany we also have the concept of „Bürgerräte“, and we have similar problems as in France (no political power to implement their solutions).

However, one takeaway was that people vastly underestimated how carefully the participants would try to understand the topic at hand. People that would usually just regurgitate angry propaganda were forced to form their own opinion and they did!

IMHO it’s this is a great tool for democracy that is yet underused.

u/haizhung

KarmaCake day338September 29, 2021View Original