Readit News logoReadit News
grakasja commented on How Kim Jong Il Kidnapped a Director, Made a Cult Hit Godzilla Knockoff (2015)   vanityfair.com/hollywood/... · Posted by u/bschne
rat87 · 4 months ago
This seems incredibly unlikely https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abduction_of_Shin_Sang-ok_an...

> To defend themselves should they ever escape North Korea, Choi and Shin decided to sneak in a tape recorder to their conversations with Kim Jong Il so they would have proof that they did not willingly leave the South. In one conversation recorded on October 19, 1983, Kim spoke openly about his plot to kidnap Shin and Choi to upgrade North Korea's film industry. He told Shin and Choi that it would be best if they spoke to the press saying that they came to North Korea voluntarily.[3] Shin and Choi attended a press conference on April 12, 1984, in Belgrade, Yugoslavia where they said they were in North Korea by their own choosing.

grakasja · 4 months ago
Their re-defection in Vienna seems extremely unlikely. The tape doesn't actually say that they were kidnapped from Hong Kong, that's the summary of a Wikipedia editor. Shin later said that if he had been blocked from making films in the 60s he would have gone to the North voluntarily. We only have his version of the story after he left NK, and the NK government version which are both going to be biased. The truth could be somewhere in the middle e.g. he was lured for a visit or talks and then kept against his will when he changed his mind.
grakasja commented on How Kim Jong Il Kidnapped a Director, Made a Cult Hit Godzilla Knockoff (2015)   vanityfair.com/hollywood/... · Posted by u/bschne
romanhn · 4 months ago
Really curious what modern North Korean cinema is like, especially compared to the slick South Korean productions. One of my favorite childhood movies growing up in late 80s Soviet Union was Hong Kil Dong, a campy North Korean martial arts movie, with a folk hero battling evil ninjas. Played across Eastern European movie theaters. Rewatching it as an adult, I was surprised how little propaganda there was in it. According to Wikipedia, the creators were inspired by Shin Sang Ok, the kidnapped director (other sources say he was directly involved - https://youtu.be/lroqzeyPVs0?si=A8yh0hNl0-d2QGgR).
grakasja · 4 months ago
"Who's that avenger with a flute? He's sticking up for poor people!"
grakasja commented on How Kim Jong Il Kidnapped a Director, Made a Cult Hit Godzilla Knockoff (2015)   vanityfair.com/hollywood/... · Posted by u/bschne
grakasja · 4 months ago
It's actually debated whether the director was "kidnapped". Lots of people in Korea believe he went willingly.

His left-wing films had been banned in the South, and Kim Jong-il offered him superstardom, big budgets and creative control. North Korea was not as bad back then, relatively speaking. Its economy still enjoyed support from both China and the USSR and it could trade with the entire Eastern bloc. South Korea was also a dictatorial military regime at the time (didn't get democracy until 1980s), and lots of South Koreans and Koreans in Japan actually moved to the North in the 60s and 70s. Shin was also generously allowed to "escape" with his family at a film festival after he and Kim ran into creative differences.

On another note Pulgasari is an interesting film because it contains a coded criticism of the Kim regime at the end.

Dead Comment

grakasja commented on Depictions of the Milky Way found in ancient Egyptian imagery   phys.org/news/2025-04-dep... · Posted by u/wglb
typeofhuman · 4 months ago
I can only imagine what the night sky looked like before electricity.

Maybe I'll have to go to Antarctica.

grakasja · 4 months ago
There are a few websites that suggest or map areas where you can get a good view e.g. https://www.darkskymap.com/nightSkyBrightness

Lots of good spots in the Western US if you're up for a long drive

grakasja commented on STASI's Zersetzung and Modern Psychological Warfare   mariobekes.com.au/from-be... · Posted by u/walterbell
moritzwarhier · 4 months ago
I was asking this in earnest and not to discredit anybody.

Like i said, I commented after reading the first couple of paragraphs, which to me sound like LLM-assisted fiction (it does not mean they are, I was hoping for someone to clear that up):

> During my recent journey to Berlin—a city where every street corner whispers secrets of a divided past—I uncovered the chilling reality of "Zersetzung." > This was not just another research assignment; it was an immersive exploration into the dark art of psychological warfare. > Amidst the solemn corridors of historic museums, I engaged with former STASI operatives and leading experts, drawing on my extensive background in human intelligence and interrogations. > Their firsthand accounts and my rigorous investigation reveal how East Germany's covert strategy was designed to systematically dismantle not only dissent but the very essence of a person's identity

No first-hand account is referenced in detail later, the article goes on in a weirdly encyclopedic style, given the introduction. It also jumps to equating the Stasi with modern types of discourse silencing.

Which might have merit! Just seemed weird given the beginning of the article.

Berlin doesn't seem to have any special relevance later in the article, but the author says that this is based on "firsthand accounts" and that their "rigorous investigation reveal how East Germany's covert strategy was designed".

I have previously read things and watched films about the Stasi (an important and interesting subject).

Bur I'm not an expert in this subject and also have no first- or second-hand experience as victim, with regimes like the DDR.

My gripe was nothing about the article's content, it just seemed as if there was no original research and the article might have been a summary of other sources.

In my opinion, while this should not be claimed lightly, it is absolutely OK to say that a piece of writing sounds like AI-generated content and ask about it.

I'm deeply sorry if this reads like I wanted to discredit an honest creator (why would I want that?)

Maybe I sound like an LLM too, sure? Or maybe the author used one to write just one or two paragraphs? I don't know!

> Join me as we delve deep into the meticulously orchestrated tactics of the Stasi—a narrative that is as compelling as it is disturbing, and one that continues to resonate in today’s era of digital manipulation.

Adjective-heavy fluff like this screams "ChatGPT"/LLM to me, and I don't see why I would not comment that when it exceeds my personal threshold for perceiving it this way.

I put in a "disclaimer" because I anticipated this coming across as rude.

Claiming that my question (or questioning any online text source) would be in line of some political "Zersetzung" strategy seems like an insult to actual victims of the Stasi to me. Of which I am not one, but my question was also not some political slander or attempt to silence the author.

Have a good day.

grakasja · 4 months ago
You were right, it does sound LLM assisted at least. It's well-written but superficial, lacking sources and examples, typical of an LLM summary. Not that it's wrong or that info about ongoing secret operations is publicly available anyway
grakasja commented on Economists don't know what's going on   economist.com/finance-and... · Posted by u/pseudolus
grakasja · 4 months ago
I don't think they ever did.

Dead Comment

grakasja commented on Whistleblower: Doge came in, data went out, and Russians started to login   threadreaderapp.com/threa... · Posted by u/HatchedLake721
grakasja · 4 months ago
Isn't an out-of-country rule relatively trivial to get around using a domestic proxy?

u/grakasja

KarmaCake day26March 26, 2025View Original