Readit News logoReadit News
geepytee commented on PCB Edge USB C Connector Library   github.com/AnasMalas/pcb-... · Posted by u/walterbell
geepytee · 5 months ago
Very clever packaging of a connector
geepytee commented on Launch YC: Optifye.ai – AI performance monitoring for factory workers   ycombinator.com/launches/... · Posted by u/walterbell
infrawhispers · a year ago
Why not frame things from the perspective of rewarding good performance? I am sure this will get bought by companies looking to squeeze their workers…and I will not be surprised if this leads to worse outcomes for staff and employers in the medium to long term.

The launch video was disgraceful.

geepytee · a year ago
>Why not frame things from the perspective of rewarding good performance?

This guy knows marketing. Agreed it would not have been as controversial

geepytee commented on GPT-4o with scheduled tasks (jawbone) is available in beta   chatgpt.com/?model=gpt-4o... · Posted by u/TheJCDenton
geepytee · a year ago
Imagine being an engineer on the Siri team, must be so demoralizing.
geepytee commented on Blackcandy: Self hosted music streaming server   github.com/blackcandy-org... · Posted by u/nateb2022
geepytee · a year ago
Never crossed my mind to self host my own music streaming server, great idea!
geepytee commented on Satellite powered estimation of global solar potential   research.google/blog/sate... · Posted by u/jonbaer
jjcm · a year ago
> 10.7k TWh globally

Agree I hate this, but at the same time I don't know if I would have groked it correctly on first read if it had listed "10.7Pwh globally". We simply aren't exposed to numbers at that scale on a regular basis.

Not sure what the correct solution is here.

geepytee · a year ago
The correct solution is 10.7Pwh. We are often exposed to 'Peta' when dealing with data.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metric_prefix

geepytee commented on Protecting undersea internet cables is a tech nightmare   spectrum.ieee.org/underse... · Posted by u/pseudolus
mrandish · a year ago
Agreed, but at the same time it would also be worthwhile to look at ways to increase our detection and policing of shipping around these cables. I'm no expert but I imagine there are ways to speed up naval reaction times, tighten penalties for ships going dark (transponder off) and set new policy norms enabling rapid investigation.

Basically things that make it harder for bad actors to maintain plausible deniability. So far, a lot of this has been done with relatively low cost and low risk for the perpetrators. The fact this Chinese ship was chased down and stopped before getting too far away was actually pretty lucky. If we formalize new systems and policies to ensure the instant a cable is cut there are navy ships converging on suspect ships - that will shift the cost calculus of the bad guys. If every cable attack requires a special submarine deploying a demolition team underwater near the target, it gets a lot more expensive and if caught there's little deniability.

If these kinds of attacks continue then I expect we'll see some extra-judicial direct action consequences imposed. Like a ship that gets away later having a mysterious accident causing it to slowly sink in deep water (thank goodness another passing ship was nearby to rescue the crew!). While I don't like it, when bad actors figure out a way to repeatedly avoid consequences, sometimes a little rule bending is needed.

geepytee · a year ago
On the transponders off point, I imagine soon we will have enough satellites such that we can map every object on the surface of the earth (specially something as large as a boat).

Could even see it through clouds using radar.

geepytee commented on Starlink Direct to Cell   starlink.com/business/dir... · Posted by u/tosh
geepytee · a year ago
Meh lines the pockets of Tim Cook. Hard pass.
geepytee commented on Starlink Direct to Cell   starlink.com/business/dir... · Posted by u/tosh
bilsbie · a year ago
Surf cam would be amazing too. Just tie a solar, starlink cam to a pier and check in.
geepytee · a year ago
I see a lot of surf cams online, are those usually custom hardware?
geepytee commented on Starlink Direct to Cell   starlink.com/business/dir... · Posted by u/tosh
cprayingmantis · a year ago
If anyone from Starlink or SpaceX is reading these comments here’s what you want to do: Sell your own branded trail cam with solar charging and LTE from orbit. You can charge $25-$40 a month for unlimited pictures sent from the cam. This would open up hunters, nature enthusiasts, and researchers to be able to place their hardware anywhere in the field without worrying about connectivity. Here in SWVA we have deep hollows that can’t get LTE without dense tower coverage that we don’t have the population to justify, but you can grab a satellite connection.

After writing this out I’m beginning to doubt the market would be big enough but I know at least 20 people with 2 or more LTE cams for deer season.

geepytee · a year ago
Interesting idea. I can build this and open source it. I imagine there is equivalent hardware over LTE already?

u/geepytee

KarmaCake day128December 24, 2022View Original